Posted on 09/17/2011 12:39:14 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
From Lifesite.net:
As of May 11, 2007, the 1,637 adverse vaccination reactions reported to the FDA via the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) included 371 serious reactions. Of the 42 women who received the vaccine while pregnant, 18 experienced side effects ranging from spontaneous abortion to fetal abnormalities. Side effects published by Merck & Co. warn the public about potential pain, fever, nausea, dizziness and itching after receiving the vaccine. Indeed, 77% of the adverse reactions reported are typical side effects to vaccinations. But other more serious side effects reported include paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and seizures.
Judicial Watch informed LifeSiteNews.com that a subsequent request for information on adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine, covering the period from May 2007 to September 2007, found that an additional 1800 adverse reactions have been reported, including more deaths. Exactly how many more deaths will be released in the coming days, Judicial Watch’s Dee Grothe informed LifeSiteNews.com.
“Opting-Out” of HPV Vaccine WILL NOT WORK for Many in Texas
The mere fact that Lord Perry created this gauntlet for parents to have to run, in my opinion is nothing less than political harassment. As if parents didn't have enough to worry about, all of a sudden they had to devote hours and days of their time, jumping through hoops, calling, writing letters, pouring over pages and pages of legalese. Perry and his toadies make it sound as if all parents had to do was fill out a simple form, check a box, and that's it. They're lying.
My question is, why would anyone give this or most other vaccines to pregnant women? The informed consents on all vaccines spell out whether they can be given to pregnant women or not. Some are fairly safe to give and others say not to give to certain classes of individuals including pregnant women. I want to see specifically the the adverse reaction stats and not something posted here without location of the data. I will reserve judgement until I read the stats myself. Individuals who are not medical personnel, often misinterpet the information.
The problem is that this article is 4 years old and is itself talking about things that happened in the past. From that, it’s clear that these pregnant women were part of a clinical study to determine which groups the vaccine whould work for. Clearly that’s partly why the vaccine is directed to girls instead of pregnant women. So, this whole 4 year old article (which promised more details in the coming days) is moot since it has no relationship to how the drug is actually used. I wonder what ever happened to those additional details from 4 years ago. And reslly who cares? The CDC has real up-to-date statistics on the drug.
“In the 32 reports confirmed, there was no unusual pattern or clustering to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine and some reports indicated a cause of death unrelated to vaccination.”
Michele Bachmann really started one hell of a shitstorm, eh?
“And yet there are no class action lawsuits, no lawyers on TV with grieving parents, no TV ads saying “if you were given the HPV vaccine, call the law firm of Will, Chethem, and Howe; we’ll represent you.” In fact, there is nothing out there.”
Maybe THAT has to due with the little piece of paper the parents have to sign before it is administered and perhaps the underpining politics/agenda.
VAERS is based on time proximity, not medical analysis. It includes all adverse events that occur within the specified time period after receiving a vaccine.
To show how that is insufficient on it’s own to make a judgment, I’ll use hypothetical numbers.
Imagine you have 100 people eligible for a vaccine. 50 of them take the vaccine, and 3 die. SO it sounds really bad.
But, what if I told you that on average, in the target population, 2 people die each day. So, in a population of 50, you’d expect 1 death a day. So if you randomly chose a day, you’d expect that within 2 days, 2 people would be dead.
But in your study, you found 3 people died after the “random day” in which you took the vaccine. so we are 1 higher than average.
Well, in fact, if you go back to real-life, and you look at the death rate for the target population of Gardasil, and look at the actual number of deaths, you find that there is no statistical increase.
And in 29 cases of death that were actually studied to see the medical reason for death, NONE were found to be related to the vaccine.
Exactly, Skanky-Girl Vaccine. Who knows what else it will cause 29 years hence in these girls.
Some of them to be alive who otherwise wouldn’t be?
Are you saying if someone gets the vaccine, steps out of their doctor’s office and gets creamed by a bus walking home, it’s being counted as vaccine related? That’s...nuts.
It is still an issue and it will always be an issue.
Why? Because it reveals a serious flaw in Perry's philosophical make up.
Look, much as I liked both Presidents Bush personally, I don't want to be disappointed, yet again, by a candidate who claims to be a conservative but doesn't have the gut-level instincts of a genuine conservative.
A genuine conservative like Ronald Reagan would never have mandated this kind of vaccine in the first place, much less done it by executive order.
Forced vaccines almost killed my baby sister. NO ONE should be forced to have something injected into them.
I don’t like this vaccine, but at the very least, they need to give women, who are sexually active, a pregnancy test before getting the vaccine.
The same case could be made for mandating an AIDS vaccine.
When an AIDS vaccine becomes available, and the Leftist medical/educrat establishment tries to ram it down parents' throats, are you going to defend politicians who try to mandate the vaccination of little children against AIDS?
Straight on. My baby sister was severely injured by this type of mandate in the 1950’s... despite her injuries NO ONE... NO ONE has EVER stepped forward to offer her any reparation for her injuries and the city of Riverside, CA... buried it. Nice for them that we were a working class family they could ignore. If this had happened to her today she would own them.
Yes she did... and it is completely legitimate.
It all gets buried by the city, county, state. If you are injured the records will simply not exist that they had ever inoculated you. Personal experience... yeah.. and this goes way back. My baby sis has health issues because of this kind of crap.
Including the "retardation" comment, and her refusal to apologize or at least walk it back?
Sorry... I have a horse in this race... family injured by this kind of crap. Funny how it all gets buried, they count on the fact that those injured are weak little people so they can bury their dirt. My sister still has damaged eyes and scars from government mandated vaccines. You and others want to deny this crap, too bad you don’t have to live it. You JUST might change your point of view. Oh, and don’t even think you can sue the government if you are injured, they have legislated protection for themselves against that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.