Posted on 09/22/2011 7:34:55 AM PDT by IbJensen
The face of kiddie porn
SUTHERLIN, Ore. -- Sutherlin police have arrested an Oakland man on child porn charges, after they say he left the electronic device at the Shell station in Sutherlin.
Officers arrested Jason Daniel Goodman, 33, after what they say was a six month investigation.
An employee of the Shell station found the device back around October of last year. They kept the item at the station waiting for someone to claim it.
In February of this year, the employee asked if he could take the iPod home since nobody claimed it. Police say he went home and charged it up, and that's when he found the porn.
He immediately turned it in to police. Sutherlin police turned it into the Oregon State Police Crime Lab. Officers say the lab was able to pinpoint who had the device when it was dropped.
According to police, over 1,400 pornographic images included some with children as young as 6-years-old.
Officers obtained a search warrant for Goodman's home, where they seized a laptop, flash drives and modems, which are being sent to the crime lab for analysis.
Goodman was arrested immediately following an interview on Tuesday at the Sutherlin Police Department. He was charged with ecouraging child sex abuse and possession of child porn.
Goodman is being held in the Douglas County Jail on $200,000 bail.
That’s a sick bunch of triplets.
I’m almost surprised that the police didn’t arrest the bloke who turned it in (or the gas station owner who retained it hoping for the owner to turn up), after all they were “in possession of child pornography”.
(Analogous stupidity in the interpretation of laws banning possession of prohibited items has occurred in other English-speaking countries: an SAS veteran was arrested and convicted in the UK for “possession of a prohibitted firearm” for turning in a gun he’d found, I think it was a sawed-off shotgun, to the local constabulary.)
I read that ridiculous action by the worthless UK coppers.
hiccup
He looks like Michael Moore
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Yes, a great resemblance there.
But - He is a lot cleaner looking - at least on the surface, and doesn’t appear as unkempt as MM -
But I guess the suspect can’t afford to look as scruffy as MM.
I never understood child pornography. In my day, pornography was a woman in a bikini selling tools.
No kidding. That is the same thing I thought when I saw his picture.
ping me if someone posts them here
Yes or Family Guy’s Peter Griffin
fruit of the poisonous tree. You can’t use suppressed evidence to find new evidence. it has to come from an independent track.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.