Deceptive NY Times headline on Solyndra ping to Today show list.
Just...wow. The NYT manages to spin even this for their guy.
Whoever thought up that headline must have gotten a raise. Well, an extra donut this morning, at least.
It wasn’t US, it was THEM. And I think they knew d@mn well the company was going broke and laundered another chunk of loot through it.
More spin in the headline— the warning signs weren’t “missed”; they were IGNORED.
I’ll pass on this criticism by Newsbusters. The article provides a lot of detail, timelines and NAMES. It is very clear early in the article that the Bush administration did it’s homework...and the 0bama admin., including PELOSI and JARRETT have very dirty hands in all of this. It’s a good article, shocked that it’s coming from the NYT.
Corrected would read:
Corrupt White House Ignored Warning Signs On Solyndra
-or-
Criminal President Ignored Warning Signs On Solyndra
Bush Administration Caused Solyndra Failure!!!!
Standard MSM modus operandi. When Republicans have screwed the pooch, it’s always “THEY, THEY, THEY!” When Dems get caught in a scandal, or if people are general upset with a Democratic-led country (such as the state we’re in now), the MSM will generalize: “people are upset with the general direction of the country...” Or, “The poll numbers of Congress are really low,” or “both parties have a share of the blame.”
Also missing from the coverage is an emphasis that a good chunk of this “jobs” loan went to pay a European firm to automate production! I guess we were creating Dutch jobs that month.
“U.S.’ Missed Warning Signs On Solyndra”
Typical MSM weasel words of apology for the Democrat Crime syndicate...
As soon as I read it the “US” sticks out like a sore thumb. We KNOW who IGNORED the warning signs and such a headline is more evidence of blatant bias by the NYT to coverup for President ZERO.
Editors create headlines, writers write the piece. Editorial staff at the NYT will stop at NOTHING to protect OTrauma.
Can’t resist:
“What you mean US, paleface?”