Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Has Until Late December to Jump In, and Still Win
News Blaze ^ | 7/25/11 | Chuck Ness

Posted on 09/25/2011 7:52:21 PM PDT by Freepmanchew


As I watch the Republican presidential debates, I must admit that we have a great field of candidates running, and if the reports about New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie getting into the race are true, then things will only get more interesting. It is a great field of candidates because America is finally getting a chance to see how truly diverse the Republican party is. After all, take a look at the Democrat party. All you will find is a who's who of the anti-American, communist-reject society.

Although I must admit that there is one person missing from the debate stage, and her absence has left many wondering why. I do know that she is of the belief that times have changed, and that Obama and the Democrats are so toxic that she could enter the race as late as November, or even late December, and still be the one to beat. Recent polls taken of just the conservative base in the Republican party prove her right. She is still the one to beat, and that has the rest of the field a little uneasy, and you can bet that Sarah is on their minds.

When Rick Perry jumped in many were claiming it's all over, but since then he has slipped. Since she won the Iowa straw poll, Michele Bachmann has slipped a bit. Rick Perry even attempted to lock up the Christian right vote before he jumped in, but Sarah Palin is still the choice of over 80% of the Christian conservatives. And guess who will show up en masse if she enters the race? You got it, the conservative Christian base. That is why the country-club Republicans keep touting Romney, or begging

(Excerpt) Read more at newsblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; palin; primary; republican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last
To: Springfield Reformer
-- Illinois requires thousands of signatures, all have to be ready to turn in by end of November --

Not less than 3000 or more than 5000 signatures, in any are required at all. 10 ILCS Sec. 7-11.

Sec. 7-11. Any candidate for President of the United States may have his name printed upon the primary ballot of his political party by filing in the office of the State Board of Elections not more than 113 and not less than 106 days prior to the date of the general primary, in any year in which a Presidential election is to be held, a petition signed by not less than 3000 or more than 5000 primary electors, members of and affiliated with the party of which he is a candidate, and no candidate for President of the United States, who fails to comply with the provisions of this Article shall have his name printed upon any primary ballot: Provided, however, that if the rules or policies of a national political party conflict with such requirements for filing petitions for President of the United States in a presidential preference primary, the Chairman of the State central committee of such national political party shall notify the State Board of Elections in writing, citing by reference the rules or policies of the national political party in conflict, and in such case the Board shall direct such petitions to be filed not more than 69 and not less than 62 days prior to the date of the general primary, in any year in which a Presidential election is to be held. Provided, further, unless rules or policies of a national political party otherwise provide, the vote for President of the United States, as herein provided for, shall be for the sole purpose of securing an expression of the sentiment and will of the party voters with respect to candidates for nomination for said office, and the vote of the state at large shall be taken and considered as advisory to the delegates and alternates at large to the national conventions of respective political parties; and the vote of the respective congressional districts shall be taken and considered as advisory to the delegates and alternates of said congressional districts to the national conventions of the respective political parties.

101 posted on 09/25/2011 11:00:41 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Ain’t you heard all the wishin and hoping going on? They’ll just wish hard enough and the Primary filing deadlines will extend just for Sarah. RIGHT...

Damn if there isn’t more Hoping than at a nobama rally. Hope they change the filing deadline.....

I would vote for her in a minute, but she ain’t getting in.


102 posted on 09/25/2011 11:15:59 PM PDT by dusttoyou (paulnutz/bachnutz/palinwishers are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Bachmann and Santornum (that’s right) are focussed on Mutt’s VP slot.


103 posted on 09/25/2011 11:19:50 PM PDT by dusttoyou (paulnutz/bachnutz/palinwishers are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Do you think the dims can get the turnout they did last time? I don’t see the excitement there for Obama anymore even among his supporters.

I also wonder how many conservatives couldn’t hold their nose and vote for McCain and just stayed home.

I think the key is turnout for both dims and Rs. That has proven to be more important than polls and percentages based on prior elections.


104 posted on 09/25/2011 11:22:12 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293
If you’re serious about running for president, you’d better start fundraising now and make it clear that you’re in the race. You either are or you aren’t. If you’re neither, you’re a weak candidate to start with.

Well some have been fundraising for a very long time so I wouldn't say that's a criteria if or not one is in or out or when. Come to think of it Reagan wasn't in until Novemeber I believe..some don't enter until their war-chest is more than just a promise...a bird in hand is always a good thing.

And you forget perhaps...this election ahead is unlike any other...some will not weigh in until those clearly on stage now are spent.

So no...you just aren't right about this.

105 posted on 09/25/2011 11:31:03 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Riiight, like it wasn’t fair for the colonials to shoot from behind every rock, tree, and bush at those out in the open redcoats. Sometimes war isn’t fair. And if you think this isn’t war, you are not paying attention.


106 posted on 09/25/2011 11:32:09 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

And calling people stupid and idiot advances the debate how?

Cindie


107 posted on 09/25/2011 11:34:39 PM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: caww

Reagan was a serious contender four years before 1980. He had been “in the arena” since his famous speech for Goldwater and his two terms as governor. For all I know, his fundraising at this point in the campaign might have been deficient, but the cost of running for president back then was no doubt less than it is now.


108 posted on 09/25/2011 11:38:20 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

Did you miss her speech in Iowa? She spoke about the evils of crony capitalism (something ALL Americans realize needs to be crushed) and spoke of a practical 5 point plan for restoring the country. Even the NYT were impressed. Since her emails came out, the ones that were supposed to be the ultimate gotcha she hasn’t had to defend herself at all.

Cindie


109 posted on 09/25/2011 11:38:41 PM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
The question is, why should Sarah enter the race ahead of her own schedule?

Maybe she's just seeing how many of her supporters are in it for the long haul....she's testing more than just the candidates.....

No matter how anybody, anywhere, spins what's Palin doing or not doing...she'll do when and if at her own pleasure....amazing fortitude to remain undeclared with the heat from media and those here on FR.. and even among her supposed loyal supporters at one time.

One amazing crafty, tenacious and remarkable woman to have this nations attention, and the worlds for that matter, be it for her or against her.... as soon as she even peeps out of her domain all eyes and ears want to know what she is up to next...and next...and next......

110 posted on 09/25/2011 11:40:07 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Where you err, is in attaching any value to the current dog and pony shows that some are calling 'debates'.

I agree with you. The current format seems designed to prevent any real discussion of issues and its funny to see them scrambling whenever a debate actually threatens to break out.

Questions are asked usually from a Dem mindset, and usually only a couple of candidates are allowed to answer a given question before moving on to another question, to which again only a couple get to answer. And they get all of a minute to answer. Pitiful.

111 posted on 09/25/2011 11:41:59 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

We do live in a different time then Reagans...that’s for certain...and thus this election will indeed have it’s surprises....regardless I have no doubt should Palin run...which she’s been doing for years....money will not be an issue.


112 posted on 09/25/2011 11:44:17 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

Why must her not getting in yet be an excuse? All campaigns have strategies. This happens to be hers. And again, tone it down. There’s no reason you can’t respond like an adult. Though I honestly think you’re very young because I’m having trouble with your incoherence.

Cindie


113 posted on 09/25/2011 11:45:27 PM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz

Some strategies are better than others.


114 posted on 09/25/2011 11:49:38 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Is that what that PSA with Nancy Pelosi was all about? A free market solution?

I listened to some of his arguments at the time, so I remember what he was trying to do.

But sometimes he's too clever for his own good. His PSA with Pelosi will live in infamy. Likewise his support for Scozzofava falls into that category.

I like him but he's not infallible. When he does a pratfall its big.

115 posted on 09/25/2011 11:51:26 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz

Her emails were definitely a non-story. As for “crony capitalism”, I guess she reads National Review as WSJ as well. Whoop.


116 posted on 09/25/2011 11:53:07 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

It’s a heck of a lot more than that. If that’s what you think (it was one show in years of campaigning, television appearances, speeches (here & abroad), white papers (see facebook where they’re available for all the world to see), two books, television news pundit, etc. Look, there’s not a thing wrong with thinking she’s not the right person for the job that’s what primaries are for. But considering how important she was in getting so many conservatives elected around the country and as hard as she campaigned for other people, your comment is a little shallow.

Cindie


117 posted on 09/25/2011 11:54:07 PM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: marron
The current format seems designed to prevent any real discussion of issues and its funny to see them scrambling whenever a debate actually threatens to break out.

Questions are asked usually from a Dem mindset, and usually only a couple of candidates are allowed to answer a given question before moving on to another question

Which of course, bears no resemblance to an actual debate. What we're watching, can best be described as an MSM inquisition, or group interrogation of the GOP candidates. Like you said, the mods scramble immediately to squelch any actual debate between the candidates.

What they will allow, are sniping attacks between candidates, because (in my opinion) that furthers their agenda to knock all of the GOP candidates down to Obama's level.

I think Palin already knew what these 'debates' would really be about, and wisely steered clear of them. The only ones who are gaining any mileage out of them, are in the second tier.

Knock down the front runners, and elevate the back of the pack. I think the MSM's plan is coming together perfectly, don't you?

118 posted on 09/25/2011 11:55:46 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou
she ain’t getting in.

Drink!

119 posted on 09/26/2011 12:02:14 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
the mods scramble immediately to squelch any actual debate between the candidates.

It gives the sensation of a debate without any real debate taking place. Its rather equivalent to MSM's "news" coverage, in which they give the impression they are informing you without actually informing you. Rather like sugar cereal. On a good day.

120 posted on 09/26/2011 12:02:14 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson