It's really too small to read Interesting as I have it in print & it has always read just fine. One could say that that entire bogus UNPUBLISHED essay was written specifically for the one that proffered it for congressional review. The same as Obama uing Tribe to write the dissertation for S.Res.511 in which Tribe interjects Obama at the end as if to sanitize Obama’ eligibility by using quotes from dissenting Supreme Court opinions as well as English law that the founders clearly had rejected. Like Christianity who only reads the back of the book, politically bias people and their posse of detractors only read the front of St George Tucker's Blackstone & disregard the back wherein Tucker tears apart Blackstone & English law and then corrects it with the proper use of natural law used by the founders. Thus the problem Mark has, he obviously was taught during the liberal parts of his legal education to quote only the front of the book when personal politics are involved, Constitution be damned!
Are you telling me that "June 14, 1967 Congressional Record - House, pages 15975 through 15880" is a lie, and didn't happen?
Are you really tedlling me that ... on Page 15880 of the
scrib.com site, the middle column, second paragraph, which says ...(quoted below) ...is a LIE?
To summarize;a natural-born citizen of the United States, as that term is used in the Constitution of the United States,means a citizen born within the territorial limits of the United States and subject to the laws of the United States at the time of such birth.
This does not Include children born within the territorial limits of the United States to alien parents who, although present with the consent of the United States, enjoy diplomatic immunity from the laws of the United States,
and, as a consequence are not subject to the laws of the United States.
Nor would this include children born within the territorial limits of the United States to alien enemy parents in time of War
as a part of a hostile military force, and, as a consequence not present with the consent of the United States,
and not subject to the laws of the United States.
But, this does Include children born to alien parents who are present within the territorial limits of the United States
“In amity” t.e. with the consent of the United States, and subject to its laws at the time of birth.
U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark 169 US 649, Luria v. U.S., 231 US 9, Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162.