"What is Next for Same-Sex Marriage Advocates?"Take a guess.
Abolishing the age of consent has been on their list for a very long time.
After 1973, prolifers warned about euthanasia and suicide as a sacrament, and we were told we were crazy- it would NEVER go there. Where are we now? Same sex? Even as the APA is looking to end child molestation as an “illness”?
There is NO END to the perversion once you open that door.
Crematories gets my vote
When incest and polygamy become legal I intend to marry everyone in my family. The tax advantages will be huge!
To the headline: polygamy, after that the age of consent being lowered.
"What is Next for Same-Sex Marriage Advocates?"Take a guess.
Sexual depravity is disordered and knows no limit or boundary. It will continue out of check until "heterosexuality" will be considered hate speech. Wait a minute...it already is. "Heterosexism" is now a charge, a condemnation.
Wrath is coming.
Let’s not forget, gays, that your own president is against you on this. Start acting up at his events!!!!!
He forgot to mention the big one the prog pervs are after -- pedophilia. They want NO age prohibitions.
In the town of Soquel, near Santa Cruz, CA, there is a Home Depot. In it, there are two bathrooms, one for "Men" and the other for "Family." The message is certainly not subtle.
I bet it is punishing faiths that refuse to buy into the statist and homoxexualist take on marriage long before polygamy and incest are seriously persued.
Loss of tax exempt status, refusial to issue marriage licenses to those who won’t play ball with the state’s take on marriage, opening up civil lawsuits to those who cry discrimination.
They already have many convinced that marriage comes from the state, probably about 40% think that “gay marriage” is a civil rights issue, polygamy and incest are really far away, probably around the 1970 levels for “gay marriage.”
Freegards
Whatever serves to further wreck the country....
For some reason this phrase made me snort into my coffee. :)
What is next? The goal of course is a Sup Court imposition of gay marriage on the entire nation. They may be somewhat reluctant to push this all the way to the Sup Court now with traitor Ted Olson’s case because of the fear that Anthony Kennedy will have a good day and rule against them. But who knows how Kennedy will come down on this? And even if Kennedy were to rule correctly that there is no Constitutional right to have the state recognize same sex unions, then it wouldn’t be all that long until they try again with another Sup Court. And if Obama is reelected, then he’ll probably get to replace Kennedy and/or Scalia, and maybe Breyer as well. And even if Obama is defeated, then there is no guarantee a Republican president will choose wisely in replacing those guys based on history.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Kennedy tried to impose a ‘compromise’ by voting to impose recognition of same-sex unions, but giving us rubes the option of what we call it; gay marriage, or civil unions, or domestic partnerships, or whatever. This would please noone but ‘moderate’ Republicans, and again a later Sup Court would probably change it so that it must be ‘marriage.’
It’s sad but true, but really the most conservatives can hope for now is a lasting Sup Court decision that says if the State recognizes traditional marriage, there is nothing in the Constitution that compels it to do the same for same sex unions. This would likely mean that Kennedy gets it right sometime in the next few years whenever the issue finally gets there, and then the election of a Republican president and Senate next year and the replacement of good and bad judges now with new conservative judges.
This would mean that the matter rightly stays with the states where it belongs. In those states where the people have got to vote, it means traditional marriage will continue to be the only recognized union. Despite changing polling data, there is almost no chance the people will actually vote down state marriage amendments they passed in the last 10 years or so. At least, I don’t think it will happen anytime soon.
My guess is that if it comes to be that the Sup Court will not impose gay marriage, then the Left will try economic coercion. I could easily see them pressuring Google, Ford, GM, et al not to open new facilities in states that ‘hate.’
But if the Left prevails in the Sup Court then it is over. We’ve failed miserably in doing away with Roe, and it would be no different with a Roe-like decision on gay marriage. With changing views, I don’t think a federal Amendment could pass that defines marriage traditionally. I use to think that at a minimum an Amendment could pass that stops short of banning gay marriage, and instead explicitly empowers the states to handle the matter and strips the courts, but now I doubt that would pass either.
Here is something which confuses me. We are hearing a lot about the Mormons and their polygamy in conjunction with the homosexual movement. But are not Mormons vehemently opposed to homosexuality? Mormons, even though I disagree with their religion, are some of the most socially upright people I have ever met. They are law-abiding, patriotic, traditionally moral people. The only exception is the question of polygamy. Yet, I do not see how the Mormons will benefit from the whole marriage equality business, since they are opposed as a religious body to all forms of sexual perversion and inchastity.
I think that the homosexuals are using the Mormons' view of polygamy as a tool in this debate and nothing else. As soon as polygamy gets past you can bet that the homosexuals will turn viciously on the Mormons. A socially moral upright group like the Mormons is already likely to be accused of hate speech. Any Mormons out there in freepland who would like to weigh in on this thought? I am really curious. (Also, I know not all Mormons support polygamy, so I would really enjoy seeing a Mormon's view on this question.)
Pedophilia, Bestiality, Mutilation, and every type of sexual perversion.
The ink wasn't dry on the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell, before the "advocates" started pushing for the military to allow "transgendered" sickos (read: men who have a fetish to dress up in women's underwear and dykes who want to dress up like men) to be fully "accepted."
When sin in not only tolerated, but applauded, evil escalates exponentially.
http://www.amazon.com/Sex-Evolution-Behavior-Martin-Daly/dp/0871507676
A: ZERO.
Heterosexual parents - fathers and mothers - should prepare their children to beware of unmarried pregnancies lest their offspring are adopted into a same sex household.
That has to be the most terrifying thought for a grandparent.
However, the cost of sperm & egg donations and rental wombs for IVF will see a huge increase in demand. Diabolical.
