Posted on 10/05/2011 1:03:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
“You really are contemptible. “
Answer the question. Are you a paid operative for the GOP or Romney campaign?
LINKS! Facts! Or doesn't that matter to our side?
Um, Texas businesses bid higher than Texas environmentalists. Sold to the men in the smoke-filled rooms!
School of IRRATIONAL Thought. (Fixed ya monica for ya)
That makes two of you in the first few links that either will NOT or will CONSIDER not voting if it's Romney.
Romney is far from my choice also - but he's not a communist, not a mooseslime and not not committed to, or controlled by, people committed to destroying our country.
So you guys would rather give your vote to 'bumbles than vote for 'not your choice.'
Puts me in mind of the saying "With friends like you, who needs enemies?" or is it "Grow up?"
I see, you just want to hear me deny it.
I don’t work for Perry or any political party or PAC or anything.
You couldn't by a clue if it was paid for and put in your hand (which I just did with that link). The people who live and work in Texas know we need more infrastructure to move goods and people. Don't comment if you don't know what you're talking about.
“Um, Texas businesses bid higher than Texas environmentalists. Sold to the men in the smoke-filled rooms!”
huh? who cares about a bunch of tree huggers?
Finished it for ya ;o)
I’ve qualified a few times on this thread that she has to run a good campaign to win. But she is the best natural politician our side has had in a generation and IMO the only one other than Romney capable of getting the nomination.
Close observers could have forecasted (and did forecast) a Romney v. Palin battle three years ago. That’s why Romney’s paid hacks didn’t even wait until McCain lost in ‘08 to go after Palin.
That’s fine. I wasn’t being specific as to who I think anybody should support.
Ha ha—so true!
Cool. Have a great day!!!!!
Thank you!
So glad we have a chance to dumb Ricardo and Romney!!!! This is fantastic news!!!!
That’s not my point. I was disputing CW’s idea that Perry’s not siding with those tree huggers was evidence that he somehow wasn’t an often-enough GOP Establishment player.
Of course, being anti-environmentalist in Texas is no evidence of being outside the GOP Establishment at all!
Don’t forget the denial of his past. Also Perry and Romney are ahead because of women vote and support for a person’s looks.
Palin isn’t running, at this point, so my point was you gotta pick who you think are the next two best candidates.
If Palin does decide to run, you can always pick her and drop the lesser of your previous candidates.
Another case of having more money than good sense.
Otherwise, I'm not familiar with the source site. If this info is reputable, the RNC is cruising for another fight this election season.
Glad to hear that. Now explain why you continue to ignore legitimate FACTS about Perry ...say for example his ‘LIE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE’ that Gore was no radical eco when he supported him, when one Google search showed Gore on PBS NOVA years before that raving like an Earth First level lunatic?
That’s ONE. Now tell me why CONSERVATIVES should back a man willing to LIE to his potential voters when the truth is so easily discovered? That’s not ‘hate’, that’s a legit question about the trustworthiness of a candidate.
I await your answer to that SPECIFIC question. Then we’ll get to the many others you refuse to address.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.