Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6

“They” know such things only if they check for them and write it down.


39 posted on 10/05/2011 6:35:37 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Condom trace evidence is well known in law enforcement. It would be standard procedure to check for the various types of trace evidence that a condom always leaves.

Besides, there’s all sorts of other DNA transfers that can occur during a sexual assault, and the likelyhood of these transfers is much greater with a gang.

Had she been assaulted using condoms, the police would be able to tell and prove it.

They would possibly even be able to prove the brand of condom.

In the LAX case, the accuser changed her story to add condoms when the DNA evidence didn’t show up, but that story didn’t work, either.

Use of a condom is obvious during a sexual assault exam and tests.


43 posted on 10/05/2011 6:47:40 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson