Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traditional1

Horse pucky. It’s easy to restrict “approved” ammunition to frangible only, where it would not pierce the pressure vessel or have any other consequences with other than soft targets. Besides, catastrophic decompression is not possible with a single bullet hole or two in a fuselage.

Just the common knowledge that other pax may be armed would be enough to insure that any further hijacking attempts would be a thing of the past.

Add in real profiling, and we could eliminate the TSA completely.


11 posted on 10/08/2011 8:43:17 AM PDT by Tigerized
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Tigerized

Hijacking is so yesterdecade.

The sealed cockpit door required today during flight makes it virtually impossible for a hijacker to capture control of a plane.

The more likely terrorist situation aboard a plane today is to bomb it, taking the entire craft down. Which is why the teeny tiny toothpaste tubes that are all that are permitted for carryons today, in hopes that would be an insufficient quantity of explosive to down the flight if it proves to be explosive.


15 posted on 10/08/2011 8:59:10 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson