Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Bathhouse Setting Study HIV (25-33% of Gay and Bisexual Men in NYC estimated to be HIV Positive)
NYU 2011 Research Report ^ | 10/13/2011 | Demetre Daskalakis, MD

Posted on 10/13/2011 7:23:34 AM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash

Page 19 - In a bathouse in New York City, Demetre Daskalakis, MD hopes to solve the mysteries of long-term resistance to HIV infection. In this unusual setting he established an HIV testing site in 2007.

(Excerpt) Read more at communications.med.nyu.edu ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: aids; hivaids; homopsychoagenda; homosexualagenda; stds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Clintons Are White Trash

Sorry, it’s on page 19 of the linked publication.


21 posted on 10/13/2011 7:59:00 AM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash (Lynn Stewart, Helen Thomas, Rosie ODonnell, Maureen Dowd, Medea Benjamin - The Axis of Ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

We aren’t condemning homosexual behavior because of political correctness.

People don’t believe male homosexual behavior can be hazardous to the health. They think that since we have safe sex campaigns and bowls of condoms in gay bars, that the problem is solved.

And they see the gay character on TV shows are always the wisest and happiest people, so they have certain images of gays in their minds, and can’t believe what the health statistics shows.


22 posted on 10/13/2011 8:05:06 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Do the most basic of research into the amount of head/neck/throat and anal cancers in gay men vs the general population. AIDS is always the focus, but there are plenty of other diseases the gay population walks around with.
23 posted on 10/13/2011 8:08:33 AM PDT by bella1 (As it was in the days of Lot....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

[ Being gay isn’t the problem, being a slut is the problem. ]

NAILED IT (in a platonic way of course)


24 posted on 10/13/2011 8:10:49 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

Oh, barry?...


25 posted on 10/13/2011 8:12:32 AM PDT by onedoug (lf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That would be due to the combination of the typical frequency of the typically high-risk behavior throughout the population, thus adding further higher levels of infection for spreading through that means. It is the frequency of that particular behavior that makes that specific population at high risk generally.


26 posted on 10/13/2011 8:21:20 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

A couple, heterosexual or homosexual, who have never had sex with anyone else have zero chance of contracting AIDS or HIV, regardless of what sexual activities they engage in.

My comment with regard to highly promiscuous heterosexual anal sex was a hypothetical, of course, as I am unaware of any human group that engages in such, outside of the porn industry, anyway.

But if they did, the health effects would be much the same as for homosexuals, who DO engage in such behavior, and which is the reason for their high risk status.

“Experts even recommend that homosexual couples in long-term, “monogamous” relationships STILL wear “protection” to prevent possible infection.”

Well of course they do! For one thing, it is well-known that “long-term” and “monogamous” have very different meanings for many homosexuals than to the general population. For the other reason, the infective status of either partner prior to the start of the relationship is a very real risk.

When it comes to potential infection, with AIDS or any other STD, you essentially have sex with everybody your partner has ever had sex with. If that number is one, as in a truly monogamous rather than serially polygamous relationship, the risk is zero. The risk factor increases dramatically with each additional contact either partner has ever had.

Long-term monogamous relationships do absolutely nothing to protect one if one’s partner comes into the relationship infected due to prior activities.


27 posted on 10/13/2011 8:44:11 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bella1
AIDS is always the focus, but there are plenty of other diseases the gay population walks around with.

VERY true.

In fact, I have a personal theory that true "San Francisco bathhouse" behavior never existed for long in previous human history. Rapid spread of infectious disease would quickly wipe out any group that engaged in it.

Only in the late 20th century did it become feasible, as antibiotics and other treatments kept the participants alive and fornicating despite their contracting multiple diseases.

Ironically, this advance in itself allowed for the rapid spread of AIDS, as the behavior that allowed for the rapid spread was only possible (for more than a brief period) due to medical technology.

28 posted on 10/13/2011 8:49:18 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

Let them donate blood! Let them join the Army!

/S


29 posted on 10/13/2011 9:00:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
Why aren’t we condemning homosexual activity as forcefully as we do with smoking? Huh?

Because gay activists will do their best to ruin the lives of anybody who opposes their agenda. Look at what happened to people who contributed money to anti-gay-marriage initiatives when their names were outed.

30 posted on 10/13/2011 9:37:03 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (When you've only heard lies your entire life, the truth sounds insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Being gay is being a slut. It’s inherent in the lifestyle. The gay lifestyle is doing anything, anywhere, anytime one wants. It’s hedonism. There is no such thing as monogamy as its defined with gays. The lifestyle is inherently opposed to monogamy.


31 posted on 10/13/2011 9:41:22 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash; manc; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

32 posted on 10/13/2011 9:45:37 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
It's not gay sex. It's promiscuous anal sex.

Correct. Which is also why HIV is such a big problem in the heterosexual population in Africa. There is rampant promiscuity and anal sex is used as a form of birth control there.

33 posted on 10/13/2011 9:49:12 AM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Interesting, thank you

You know have you ever thought how long cancer has been around?
I bet nearly all of us know someone who has died or had cancer and yet there is still not many ways to treat it.

How long was HIV and AIDS around, how long did it take for a tablet and a near cure to be made?


34 posted on 10/13/2011 9:52:25 AM PDT by manc (Beware pro OWS trolls who promote the protests on here,then send freep mail. Marriage= 1man+1 woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

Another reason to reject NObamacare.

The cost of treating this disease is astromical & it is entirely self destructive.


35 posted on 10/13/2011 10:14:57 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

Not to mention some other somewhat bizarre het sexual practices I won’t go into detail on.

BTW, it is utterly politically incorrect to suggest there might be anything about African sexual practices that contribute to its high rate of infection.

Also, I have become highly skeptical of the infection rates mentioned for Africa. If the numbers were anywhere near as high as some of the claims, some of these countries should be dropping in population, and I don’t believe they are.


36 posted on 10/13/2011 10:22:03 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I always remember the theatre critic, John Simon, running out of a gay-friendly show in the 1980s, yelling: “The theatre will never get back to normal until they all die of AIDS!”


37 posted on 10/13/2011 11:29:00 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Let's have a Cain Mutiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: manc

A worthwhile scientific experiment would be to take blood samples from gays and blood samples from heterosexuals and then compare them for sexually transmitted diseases of every kind. What are some of the diseases that they carry? Isn’t hepatitis commonly found in gays?


38 posted on 10/13/2011 4:54:21 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Don’t know about Hepatitis, however wiener is almost always found in homos.


39 posted on 10/13/2011 4:58:17 PM PDT by 11Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

Notice how the percentage of men who have sex with men and women who have sex with men are nearly identical. Guess that means that women who have HIV are most likely getting it from men who have sex with other men. Could that go back to what goes on in the prison world?


40 posted on 10/13/2011 5:01:01 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson