Skip to comments.
Adobe shows off new 'undo photo blur' feature
http://www.physorg.com ^
| 13 OCT 2011
| Bob Yirka
Posted on 10/13/2011 11:59:03 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: TSgt
Or.....”Beauty may be only skin deep, but UGLY goes right down to the bone.”
21
posted on
10/13/2011 12:19:16 PM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: KarlInOhio
Already been done. A couple years back a guy posted video of himself raping children but with his face blurred out.
The cops “unblurred” it, arrested and convicted him.
To: TSgt
The Adobe PhotoshoppingBag feature might be of some use there.
23
posted on
10/13/2011 12:22:39 PM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: TSgt
24
posted on
10/13/2011 12:26:25 PM PDT
by
rdax
To: Paradox
My guess is that eventually this will become feature with a camera, just like so many others. One step in the right direction.
25
posted on
10/13/2011 12:26:51 PM PDT
by
flaglady47
(When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
To: Red Badger
My friends told me all about it.
26
posted on
10/13/2011 12:26:51 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
To: andy58-in-nh
27
posted on
10/13/2011 12:27:09 PM PDT
by
TSgt
(When in the Course of human events...)
To: Red Badger
They used this back in 1987 to try to identify “Yuri” in “No Way Out.”
28
posted on
10/13/2011 12:27:31 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Red Badger
This is because if the new feature is indeed added to Photoshop, it will still be out of most people’s grasp due to the high price of the product.
<><><><
Yea, high priced for a couple of weeks.
Anybody remember the price of the IBM PC when it first came out? You know, the 8088 chip with 4K of RAM and 2 floppy drives?
It will be in Gimp (the freeware equivalent of Photoshop) overnight.
29
posted on
10/13/2011 12:32:17 PM PDT
by
dmz
To: All
Would love to see the results when used on some of the vintage photographs I have in my collection.
30
posted on
10/13/2011 12:32:48 PM PDT
by
warsaw44
To: Red Badger
31
posted on
10/13/2011 12:35:49 PM PDT
by
Brandonmark
(2012: Our Hope IS Change!)
To: Red Badger
How many bits per pixel of dynamic range resolution were provided by the camera that took the flower picture?
32
posted on
10/13/2011 12:38:23 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: Red Badger
How many bits per pixel of dynamic range resolution were provided by the camera that took the flower picture?
33
posted on
10/13/2011 12:38:26 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: George from New England
Don’t believe it. Too easy to show these so called samples.
Looks more like the photo has gaussian blur applied then removed.
34
posted on
10/13/2011 12:38:43 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(ALCS/NLCS playoff thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2789907/posts)
To: Jonty30
You may need new set of ‘friends’.......
35
posted on
10/13/2011 12:39:31 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
To: Red Badger
So when released photos are blurred to hide the identity of a person, the facial features can be restored?
To: Red Badger
much more difficult to solve as it involves camera movement...
Three mutually perpendicular velocimeters/accelerometers integrated on a chip inside the camera storing medadata would make calculating the deconvolution kernal almost trivial.
37
posted on
10/13/2011 12:44:04 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
kernel, metadata. lunchtime.
38
posted on
10/13/2011 12:45:58 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
Three mutually perpendicular velocimeters/accelerometers integrated on a chip inside the camera storing medadata would make calculating the deconvolution kernal almost trivial. Well, of course, everybody knows that..........whatever it is..........
39
posted on
10/13/2011 12:48:52 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
To: Deaf Smith
Well no, that’s a different kind of blurring, more like pixellation.........
40
posted on
10/13/2011 12:50:05 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
