Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/14/2011 4:19:56 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Certainly, it is not. We will fight it tooth, and nail, but ultimately there will be one. If there wasn’t to be one, then the Bible wouldn’t mention all of the beheaded Christians.

In any event, these collapses are exactly what the NWO wants, while there are black swans, and no one has complete control, there will be some control for several years. The NWO is a concept and goal that surpasses lifetimes, it’s something that has been pushed for, basically, forever. Its names have changed, and the players involved come and go, but the fight is omnipresent.


2 posted on 10/14/2011 4:25:37 AM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
“The hidden ultimate goal of economic union was political union — a United States of Europe as model and core of the 21st century world government.”

I think this was a mistake. What goes well for one goes well for all. But, what goes wrong for one (Example: Greece) goes wrong for all, as well.

Thatcher was right.

3 posted on 10/14/2011 4:27:46 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Socialism means slavery." Lord Acton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
New World Order becoming unravelled? Are you kidding? It’s just starting............... Daniel 7: 23Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. 24And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings....... That word ‘subdue’ doesn’t necessarily mean by military power – it could just as readily mean that they willing invite a leader to take them over. Likewise, that word ‘kings doesn’t mean in the classical sense – it could just mean ‘power’. I have always thought that the passages that refer to rise of the antichrist indicate that this leader waltzes in on a platform of peace/prosperity and countries will willingly agree to fold themselves under his wing because he will be viewed as a brilliant leader unlike anything they have ever seen before..... and they are hoodwinked into thinking that he will take all their problems away. Bible prophecy indicates that he initially takes over three countries..... and then builds from there.
5 posted on 10/14/2011 4:55:56 AM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They will keep it alive, at all costs, with lies.

Once we reach the Triple Witching Hour on sovereign default I expect the US, Euros, ChiComs and Saudis to come together in a secret meeting and all agree to one huge, bodacious, immense lie to keep things rolling along as they have been.


7 posted on 10/14/2011 6:03:12 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Europe is unravelling, but Europe may not be especially relevant to the new world order. The world today is divided into three camps: the lazy, the ambitious, and the incompetent. Europe and Japan have gotten lazy: old, comfortable, risk averse, reflexively protectionist, and collapsing demographically. In the ambitious camp are the rising powers that have figured out they don’t have to be poor, that market economies work. The incompetents are the basket cases.

Countries can move from one camp to another. BO is currently trying to move the U.S. from the ambitious camp to the lazy camp. If he succeeds, we — like Europe — will be incidental to building the new world order.

China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Taiwan, and other rising powers are going to drive global growth for the next couple of generations. We can be part of the growth caucus if we are willing to compete. Or we can choose to be an also ran, and settle in for a long decline.


12 posted on 10/14/2011 6:33:44 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
No -- although the definitions of "New World Order" are certainly debatable.

It might have been postponed, but I doubt that. I would rather expect a renewed vigor for it inevitable fulfillment.

Every "crisis" puts another brick in the wall.

13 posted on 10/14/2011 6:42:20 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Remember the tower of Babel..........


14 posted on 10/14/2011 6:48:39 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for the post Kaslin.

I don’t think Communism is dead.
It’s always been here only the
name changes.

As long as the education system
is run by “progressives” / Commies,
they will eventually out breed
conservatives.


19 posted on 10/14/2011 12:42:23 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson