Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sierra Club: Perry’s Energy Plan: Wheeze Baby Wheeze [American families have enough to worry about]
ENews (electronic news) ^ | October

Posted on 10/15/2011 1:28:17 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Pittsburgh--(ENEWSPF)--October 14, 2011. Today, Texas Governor and Republican presidential hopeful Rick Perry unveiled his energy plan for America. The plan, if implemented, will poison our air and water with toxic pollutants like soot, smog, arsenic, cadmium, dioxin, lead, and formaldehyde. It would also undercut safeguards from mercury, which is a neurotoxin and is known to harm developing fetuses.

“Rick Perry’s energy plan reads like a roadmap for making America’s kids sick,” said Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune. “Under this plan, we can expect to see much higher rates of asthma among children, and risk to pregnant women from mercury exposure. Republicans like Perry are putting polluters’ profits first and our kids’ health last. The Republican mantra should be ‘wheeze, baby, wheeze.”

Perry’s plan calls for scaling back basic EPA safeguards that protect our clean air and water. It would simultaneously expand development of dirty energy like coal, oil, and natural gas amounting to a one-two punch to Americans’ health.

“American families have enough to worry about,” Brune said. “They don’t need to spend more time taking their kids to the doctor or more money on hospital bills. The only people who stand to profit from this plan are overpaid oil, coal and natural gas CEOs.”

“Dismantling the EPA and assuming that states are properly watching over natural gas drilling is dangerous and puts the health of our families and communities at risk.”

Perry’s plan would also undercut the expansion of jobs in industries like solar—the fastest-growing industry in the energy sector.

“There’s a solution to the current epidemic of pollution-related illness that will also create good, lasting local jobs, and secure America’s energy independence,” said Brune. “It’s clean energy. America’s clean energy industry is strong and thriving, even in this down economy. Rick Perry’s plan would stifle that growth and return our country to a dirty, antiquated energy system. Under his plan, we’ll see asthma rates among American kids soar, while countries like China surpass us in reaping the benefits from clean energy like solar and wind."

In fact, America is predicted to become the world’s leader in solar energy by 2014, and in 2010, the U.S. was a net exporter of solar by $2 billion. Solar energy creates seven times more jobs than coal, nuclear and natural gas.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: green; naturalresources; perry2012; solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I’ve posted this way for over 10 years.

Poppycock. I've been here longer than that and this is far more prevalent and extensive.

You can go jump in a lake — you self-appointed hall monitor.

This kind of advocacy loading up the sidebar has transformed you from an occasional poster into a shrieking harpie.

21 posted on 10/15/2011 8:51:37 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who belong in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
you self-appointed hall monitor.

It's no surprise that you wouldn't recognize self-government when you saw it. Hence, it fits that you would support an empty-suit statist like Perry.

22 posted on 10/15/2011 8:54:26 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who belong in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc; Cincinatus' Wife; shield; casinva

woops! That should have read; “grubbing for roots and berries”.

Anyway, the Sierra Club can kiss my grit.


23 posted on 10/15/2011 8:56:38 AM PDT by smoothsailing (DEFEND OUR MARINES - http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Do you send love notes like this to other posters or do you just monitor me?


24 posted on 10/15/2011 8:58:44 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

You must not be trilled with Perry’s energy plan to people back to work.

I’d forgotten, you’re that tree-hugger with your own book.


25 posted on 10/15/2011 9:02:08 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

26 posted on 10/15/2011 9:03:55 AM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

If these Capitalism-destroying, Commie lovers hate Perry’s plan, I love it.


27 posted on 10/15/2011 9:05:51 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
We've now made it to Step 4:
  1. Post an MSM story favorable to said candidate or unfavorable in a manner supposedly attractive to conservatives.
  2. Immediately put up a blizzard of preconstructed posts containing related links, talking points, and excerpts about all sorts of candidate related schtuffe. These posts are to be of sufficient length that they encompass as much as most people would ever want to read. The purpose is not to get them to read it but to use up space so that by the time anyone with a contrary opinion might post, it is too far down the page for most people to bother. This technique turns a discussion forum into an advertising page. 
  3. Offer warning posts to one's cohorts that the (insert candidate initial here) "bots" or some other epithet will soon be there. Gasp! 
  4. If someone does show up and post the obvious, stand ready with one of two responses: either a canned set of factoids similar to item 2, or outright insults, obliquely condescending slaps, and other niceties. You and shield are real pros with these CW. 
  5. If said "opponent" provides significant fact or content, ignore it completely. Instead ping said cohorts, especially those with lists of backers. 
  6. By this time, the thread is populated either with only diehards or somebody with a point to make for future reference (as I did here). Little did they know that I was also doing this to expose the pattern with this post. The thread descends into what might otherwise appear to be a flame war.
  7. Repeat the process with similar postings with which to fill up the sidebar or make good an escape should they take too much of a beating on facts.

28 posted on 10/15/2011 9:08:19 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who belong in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

You put way to much thought into this. I worry about your sanity more than your motives for making up lists about posters. Your periodic call for others to be banned from FR is paranoia.

But if you need someone to talk to and keep you company, just keep posting and bumping the thread and someone else will eventually come along to comment about your efforts.


29 posted on 10/15/2011 9:15:23 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
If these Capitalism-destroying, Commie lovers hate Perry’s plan, I love it.

BUMP!

30 posted on 10/15/2011 9:17:54 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: shield

I LIKE!

A LOT!

Someone needs to tell him (or Anita) to get out word about Texas’ “Baker’s Law.”

That really strikes a chord with a lot of people.


31 posted on 10/15/2011 9:25:37 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

So who do you think is better than Perry? Make your case. I’m Perry until someone better comes along.


32 posted on 10/15/2011 9:30:53 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; shield

Are you referring to this Texas Baker’s Law?

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/82R/billtext/pdf/SB00081F.pdf#navpanes=0

SB 81 by Senator Jane Nelson

House Sponsor: Representative Lois Kolkhorst

Signed into law by Governor Rick Perry on 6/17/2011.

Summary of sections 5 and 6 of the bill, which pertain to Cottage Food Operations.


33 posted on 10/15/2011 9:55:01 AM PDT by casinva (The stock in McDonalds has just gone down because Obama has been serving so many whoppers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

smoothsailing,

It’s not so bad eating roots and berries.

Here is a recipe for one of the EPA’s most popular recipes, Root Soup with a Texas Jalapeno flair in honor of Texas Governor Rick Perry.

Root Soup

5 Large Plum Tomatoes
1 Large Red Pepper
1/2 Medium Beet
1/4 C Pine Nuts
1/2 Small Jalapeno Chili Pepper (to taste)
1 clove of garlic
1/4C Chives
1T Horseradish

Put all except chives into a high powered blender and blend until smooth and creamy - sprinkle with chopped chives. Nice cold or warm. Nice topped with a small dollop of fermented cashew nut cheese.

Plus... A nice precursor to the Rick Perry TexMex Root Soup is the Roasted Root Vegetable & Wheat Berry Salad here:
http://www.davidlebovitz.com/2010/01/roasted-root-vegetable-wheat-ber/


34 posted on 10/15/2011 10:04:37 AM PDT by casinva (The stock in McDonalds has just gone down because Obama has been serving so many whoppers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: casinva
Here is a recipe for one of the EPA’s most popular recipes, Root Soup with a Texas Jalapeno flair in honor of Texas Governor Rick Perry.

Oh sure, now I know you're pulling my leg! LOL!

35 posted on 10/15/2011 10:15:37 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
So who do you think is better than Perry?

Better qualified: Newt, Santorum, Johnson, and Huntsman.

More intelligent: To the above add Romney, Bachmann and Cain.

More conservative: all of the above except Rommey, Johnson, and Huntsman. Newt is close to a tie.

That leaves Santorum, Bachmann, and Cain as probably better choices to be President. Politically, the first two have flamed. That leaves Cain. Am I happy about 9-9-9? No, but a NRST won't pass the Congress anyway. Perry is sinking while Cain is ascendant and polls better against both Romney and Zero. Not a bad indicator at this point.

36 posted on 10/15/2011 9:32:28 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who belong in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I completely agree with you analysis of the candidates.

I receive emails from the Sierra club because I attended a meeting opposing the coal terminal in my county in WA state. I now have a new opinion of the Sierra club, from those emails. Most of the members of the Sierra Club seem to be well-intentioned dupes that just aren’t that smart.

One of issues that was covered in the last email notice was mercury in tuna. They warned that coal burning power plants could be polluting your tunafish sandwich with mercury because the coal burning power plants were polluting lakes streams.


37 posted on 10/15/2011 9:41:51 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Most of the members of the Sierra Club seem to be well-intentioned dupes that just aren’t that smart.

The lawyers who run it are another matter.

They warned that coal burning power plants could be polluting your tunafish sandwich with mercury because the coal burning power plants were polluting lakes streams.

Burning coal does introduce a lot of mercury, but a forest or brush fire in a cinnabar formation produces a lot more. The amount released from coal plants compared to background sources is not that big a deal and it could be a lot less if there was an economic reason to invest in new plants. With the threat of the Sierra Club around, regulatory risk becomes a big part of that decision.

38 posted on 10/15/2011 9:45:46 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who belong in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I completely agree with you analysis of the candidates.

You'll note that I didn't list Romney as "better qualified." There is a reason. Anybody who institutes an effectively socialized market in healthcare is too crooked to consider as "qualified" to be President. Anyone who engages in situational policy preferences without a serious explanation for the change is too dishonest to consider (Perry falls under that category too). Romney fails both.

39 posted on 10/15/2011 9:58:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who belong in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson