Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Miracle' tornado survivor denied workers' comp
AP via Yahoo ^ | October 23rd 2011 | Jim Salter

Posted on 10/23/2011 1:40:53 PM PDT by Cardhu

JOPLIN, Mo. (AP) — By all accounts, Mark Lindquist is a hero, an underpaid social worker who nearly gave his life trying to save three developmentally disabled adults from the Joplin tornado. Both houses of the Missouri legislature honored Lindquist, the Senate resolution calling him "a true hero and inspiration to others."

But heroism doesn't pay the bills. The tornado's 200 mph winds tossed Lindquist nearly a block, broke every rib, obliterated his shoulder, knocked out most of his teeth and put him in a coma for about two months.

Lindquist, 51, ran up medical expenses that exceed $2.5 million, and the bills keep coming. He requires 11 daily prescriptions and will need more surgery.

But he has no medical insurance. Lindquist couldn't afford it on a job paying barely above minimum wage. He assumed workers' compensation would cover his bills, but his claim was denied "based on the fact that there was no greater risk than the general public at the time you were involved in the Joplin tornado," according to a letter to Lindquist from Accident Fund Insurance Company of America, his company's workers' comp provider.

That reasoning has angered Lindquist's family, employer, even lawmakers.

"I think they need to take another look at the circumstances and revisit the claim," state Rep. Bill Lant, R-Joplin, said. "What he did went beyond heroics."

Lindquist watched the skies darken on the evening of May 22 while on his way to the group home occupied by Mark Farmer, Rick Fox and Tripp Miller, three middle-aged men with Down syndrome. Soon after he arrived, a tornado siren began to blare.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: joplin; lindquist; medicalcomplex; organizedcrime; socialism; taxhikes; tornado
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
"Lindquist's employer, Community Support Services, had recently put workers through a tornado drill, so Lindquist and co-worker Ryan Tackett knew what to do. Because there was no basement or shelter and the residents moved too slowly to relocate, Lindquist and Tackett placed mattresses over the men for protection, then climbed atop the mattresses for added weight."
1 posted on 10/23/2011 1:41:00 PM PDT by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

They’ll change their minds. He will end up getting his med bills paid. Good hearted people around this country will see to that.


2 posted on 10/23/2011 1:51:47 PM PDT by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

His “accident” was not caused by any action of his employer. Case Closed!


3 posted on 10/23/2011 1:52:12 PM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Disgraceful


4 posted on 10/23/2011 1:53:34 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

No good deed goes unpunished.


5 posted on 10/23/2011 1:54:46 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

In Missouri, they’ll have to pay. The company I worked for previously had an employee hit by a car in the parking lot. He’s on the premises, on the clock. Pay up.
What company insures the shelter?


6 posted on 10/23/2011 1:54:56 PM PDT by steve8714 (Where there were two, now there's only me. When will I laugh again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH

People have all kinds of comp claims paid that have nothing to do with any action of their employer. If you are performing your job and it results in you being injured, that’s a comp claim.


7 posted on 10/23/2011 1:57:13 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DH

WC insurance is not for the actions of an employer but to cover risks of the job. A tornado is an act of God, however his job was to supervise these kids, leaving them would have been dereliction. He was doing his job. Pay up.


8 posted on 10/23/2011 1:57:36 PM PDT by steve8714 (Where there were two, now there's only me. When will I laugh again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DH

Appeal. there are at least 2 levels left.


9 posted on 10/23/2011 1:58:49 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

You said it before I could!!


10 posted on 10/23/2011 1:59:47 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

It’s insurance company bullsh*t like this that gives progressives the high road. Every company that insures with them should mail their intention to cancel notices tomorrow. I’m sure there will be plenty of companies looking to pick up the business.


11 posted on 10/23/2011 2:00:55 PM PDT by LRoggy (Peter's Son's Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH

I agree with you on this one. He certainly should have his expenses covered by someone (including the people whose lives he saved, if possible), but it seems that this is clearly not a legitimate Workers Compensation Insurance claim based on what is being reported.


12 posted on 10/23/2011 2:03:34 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

>>>I agree with you on this one. He certainly should have his expenses covered by someone (including the people whose lives he saved, if possible)

The article states the people saved were 3 downs syndrome middle aged men. You’ll see Chrissy Mathews vote Republican for president before the 3 saved people can “pay up” as you would have them...


13 posted on 10/23/2011 2:09:52 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Hope & Change - I'm out of hope, and change is all I have left every week | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Mark Lindquist, of Joplin, Mo., and his sister, Linda Baldwin, walk together on Oct. 3, prior to Lindquist's release from the Missouri Rehabilitation Center in Mount Vernon, Mo. Lindquist suffered serious injuries during the May 22, 2011, tornado that destroyed a significant portion of Joplin.


14 posted on 10/23/2011 2:24:13 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa; Alberta's Child

The three men with Down’s Syndrome were killed by the tornado. Lindquist was injured trying to protect them. He’s still a hero, by any measure.


15 posted on 10/23/2011 2:26:09 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

But— if you have Adult/Baby Syndrome, you can get SSI...


16 posted on 10/23/2011 2:28:14 PM PDT by Engedi (Hec)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DH

Incidents don’t need to be caused by employer to be covered. Each state/company providing coverage has a little different laws/rules covering worker’s comp. but in most cases the employee only needs to be on the clock to be covered. May be some exclusion about act of God/nature but not sure about that angle. If that is the case you would think that is what his denial would have said.


17 posted on 10/23/2011 2:30:42 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

So, this boils down to a few basic facts.

1. He opted for a career as a Social Worker (and if he didn’t know that Social Work isn’t a high paying field - he should give his diploma back - it ain’t no big secret).

2. He used his degree to take a job that pays slightly above minimum wage, and MADE THE CONSCIOUS CHOICE NOT TO ELECT TO TAKE MEDICAL INSURANCE.

3. Now that he’s hurt; he expects everyone else to take the hit - because he made a stupid decision to pass on getting medical insurance.

4. Can I stop paying $785/month for my family’s medical insurance program; and then demand that workman’s comp pay any bills if I get hurt?


18 posted on 10/23/2011 2:40:09 PM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
It happened while he was performing his job instead of saving himself. It was on the job, therefore covered.

vaudine

19 posted on 10/23/2011 2:59:35 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve8714; All
In Missouri, they’ll have to pay. The company I worked for previously had an employee hit by a car in the parking lot. He’s on the premises, on the clock. Pay up.

In Texas, Worker's Comp is subject to strict limits per incident and per employee. The total amount of insured loss here used to be around $250,000 per claim per individual. According to the article, a quarter of a million would only make a down payment on the Mr. Lindquist's loss. That leaves Chapter 7 as his only viable alternative.

My guess is the carrier has properly refused to pay because other claims have exceeded policy limits. I would also guess that Lindquist's lawyers are challenging the insurance company because he is still accumulating charges and wants full discharge (which won't happen runs up costs "knowing" they cannot be settled except by bankruptcy).

Ultimately, the legal process will run its course, the medical providers will be stuck with the charges; they will raise their rates and/or receive public funds as compensation. The net result is that the taxpaying public will pay -- as always.

Meanwhile, this article is almost certainly nothing more than legal posturing (i.e. propaganda) repeated by opportunistic politicians and newswriters too stupid to know otherwise.

20 posted on 10/23/2011 3:06:03 PM PDT by Zakeet (If it ain't broke, the Wee Wee will fix it until it is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson