Posted on 10/23/2011 11:48:16 PM PDT by jackal7163
Never thought I'd feel sorry for the bastard, but sodomizing a 69 year old man prior to execution is something only arabs can do...
Love your tagline and fully agree with it, however, as much as it pains me to say this, the mooselimbs are of my species, which makes me utterly ashamed.
It doesn’t bode well for the future of the country. Obama’s type of guys.
>> Take a quick look at how Europeans have tortured and killed political opponents down through history <<
Amen to that. Col. Qaddafi probably suffered a lot less than he would, had he been drawn-and-quartered or burned at the stake — forms of execution that were common in Europe until just a few hundred years ago.
The fact that the rebels did this says more about them than it does Gaddafi. Yes, he was a despicable dictator, but it’s one thing to take justice into your own hands and murder him after capture, it’s another to do something so wicked to him before killing him.
In the mid 80s, before the Lockerbie bombing, we had a Maltese immigrant working food services. He had an autographed photo of Ghaddafi on his dormitory wall.
He said Ghaddafi was a frequent visitor to the island and gave them money for schools and hospitals.
The leadership questioned him, but he wasn't breaking any rules.
Yep...and Hitler was kind to dogs...
amen
Can you imagine the cacophany from the Left if Bush was still in office?
One tyrant replaces the other.
I've lived in those areas, too. Those who act this way are crazier than **** house rats. If you are so well travelled, you know that this culture is the result of the worship of a pagan moon god.
A person who is repulsed by this behavior is not "poly-annish," nor are they for rejecting the "honor-killing" of daughters.
More than not, this was also the way that justice was dispensed in the old west before civility came across the plains.
Are you suggesting the homosexual butt-rape of prisoners was prevalent in the old west? I hope you have a source to back that up!
Unless I missed something, sodomization includes all kinds of other acts outside those of homosexuality. It is also referred to by use of other objects such as broom handles. If he were actually sexually sodomized, then no, but there have been all sorts of human degradation by acts as bad as or worse than sodomization with an inanimate object all through history as the ultimate act of personal degradation up to and after the violent death of a tyrant.
I really do believe that real torture should be considered to be a crime against humanity; however, we've so weakened the definition of what real torture is that we've ranked water-boarding up there with the despicable acts used by these psychotics. Putting water-boarding into the same category demeans the definition of what torture really is.
Real torture should be limited to those actions that result in long lasting physical damage to an individual. Acts that do not physically disfigure a person, break any of his/her bones, pull out fingernails or toenails, or create any kind of permanent physical marks should not be considered to be torture. Scaring someone enough so that he/she is willing to give up their secrets should not be considered to be torture. Psychological means should be permitted.
If a mad dog bites you, to the point of you needing a time on the hospital, putting it down is quite reasonable. Kicking it, then putting it down, is something a sociopath would do. Just saying.
mankind is not degenerating. This was always the way among Moslems...
Yes it is, and I can prove it to you in terms of music alone, none of it being muslim either.
Lemme know if you want me to prove it to you, and I’ll send you links to two pieces of music that illustrate just how far we have fallen.
I know, you’ll give me Mozart and Lady Gaga. However, that is a different matter. You specifically commented on this dastardly act — which was done by Moslems on a Moslem. As the west loses its Christianity it will go the same way, yes...
I remember the old Cartoon—Superchicken— “He knew the job was dangerous when he took it.” Same old story they have been telling for thousands of years. Now we call them “Presidents for life” in the past they were called “Kings”. same thing. I can only hope the next leader (Tyrant) is better and will give a little back to his people. They will not be Iranian Stooges because the people there have little love for Persians. They will fall under the influence of France and Germany all for cheap oil. Gaddafi got what he gave—Now a new day is coming to that land—lets hope its better (but I would not bet the farm on it).
There’s been one or more articles on FR today and yesterday - Libya’s going Islamist, Tunisia just did. The entire Middle east/North Africa is all going into radical Muslim governance/hell.
Thanks, 0*uckhead!!
The problem with moslem on moslem act, for me at least, is that I suspect our president was involved in this, however, I have no proof of that.
While I love Mozart and despise “Lady” Gaga, those were not the examples I had in mind, rather Conway Twitty’s “Lay you Down” and “F*ck the Pain Away” by something that calls itself Peaches.
I do invite you to view both of these songs on youtube, I don’t want to link the second one here, because it is foul and without merit, and I don’t want to get in trouble.
But the difference between these two pieces of music is a rather stark illustration of just how far down the rabbit hole we have gone in this country alone.
We are not going backwards, we are simply going down.
Does this mean that you actually expect other-than-primitive "thinking" from Islamorons?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.