Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyer Says $12M Verdict Reasonable (against Progressive Insurance)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | Sat, Oct 29, 2011 | Jeff Proctor

Posted on 10/29/2011 7:03:01 PM PDT by CedarDave

A Bernalillo County jury’s $12 million judgment this week against Progressive Insurance Co. was “very reasonable,” according to attorneys representing the family who sued.

Lawyer Janet Santillanes said that among the evidence jurors heard during the six-day trial was that Progressive altered its computer records 11 days after a Nov. 4, 2002, accident to make it appear the Vigil family did not have coverage at the time of the single-vehicle crash that was at the center of the case.

The company contended the policy lapsed about 90 minutes before the crash that killed one man and hospitalized five other passengers. Jurors also heard that Colleen Vigil called Progressive twice — two weeks before the crash and the day before — and was assured her policy was valid, with no payment due until Nov. 15, Santillanes said in a telephone interview with the Journal on Thursday.

She said Progressive’s policy is to record all conversations with policyholders, but the recordings of Colleen Vigil’s calls either were lost or never made.

A Bernalillo County District Court jury granted the Vigil family $11.7 million in punitive damages designed to punish Progressive for bad faith, and a few hundred thousand more in compensatory damages and for pain and suffering.

“The jury also heard evidence that Progressive’s profits are $3.8 million a day and (the company) had 11,700,000 policies in effect in 2010,” Santillanes said. “So the amount of damages to a multi-billion dollar corporation for a case that took nine years was very reasonable.”

(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: insurance; progressive; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: max americana

How could they be “cheap”

They seem to spend more on adverts than anybody....


21 posted on 10/29/2011 7:29:29 PM PDT by nascarnation (DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I hope the fine print on my various insurance policies does not give the insurance company a way to avoid paying. Food for thought.


22 posted on 10/29/2011 7:30:03 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I would never have bought their insurance anyway - their commercials creep me out,


23 posted on 10/29/2011 7:31:16 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Go Steelers (what's the baseball team called again?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

Progressive admitted they record all calls, but ‘lost’ the recording of the plaintiff’s calls.


24 posted on 10/29/2011 7:31:18 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

Technically you are correct, but if the Presiding Judge found MERIT in The EVIDENCE ( allowed), as did the JURY presumably, the Judge should have IMMEDIATELY ORDERED A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION at the Moment the Evidence was introduced. The Judge should be removed from the Bench. THEY BELONG IN PRISON.


25 posted on 10/29/2011 7:32:50 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster
Who calls their insurance company twice in two weeks to find out if their insurance is still in effect? Sounds as if they hadn't paid the premium.

I did. I prepaid cash for 6 months. And then got a notice from the underwriter's computer geeks that had me living in a place I haven't lived in 12 years, jacking up the premium by $56.

So on the pumpkin day, I called for the 3rd time to make sure they had gotten the certified proof that not only do I live where I live but have for years.

It's called follow-up.

Caveat Emptor.

/johnny

26 posted on 10/29/2011 7:39:11 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

From my own experience with this company - GOOD!


27 posted on 10/29/2011 7:39:22 PM PDT by AZhardliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

some insurance companies are more decent than others.

The day the Clutter family was murdered in Kansas, Herb Clutter had taken out a large life insurance policy on himself.

The entire family was murdered that night. Clutter’s check had not been deposited and for what ever legal reason, the insurance company had no legal responsibility to pay the claim.

The company, New York Life, went ahead and paid anyway, maybe partly for good publicity and maybe partly because they thought it was the right thing to do.


28 posted on 10/29/2011 7:42:27 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Flo's not surprised. Image and video hosting by TinyPic
29 posted on 10/29/2011 7:43:52 PM PDT by peggybac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Progressive was duckspeak for communists in the early days.

So Roosevelt and the Bullmoose Party were communists?

30 posted on 10/29/2011 7:43:56 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

It doesn’t matter if the check had been deposited.

It only only had to be given to the agent or broker, or put in the mail.


31 posted on 10/29/2011 7:44:51 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
"Isn’t this in the same area where that woman won the McDonald’s coffee spill suit?"

It was in New Mexico.

It's really a shame when folks try to trivialize that case.

32 posted on 10/29/2011 7:50:04 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

No, just incredibly misguided. TR was a big gov statist.


33 posted on 10/29/2011 7:52:42 PM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: max americana

I know members of the family. I should amend that to *knew*. We no longer speak.

They are not just Dem supporters. They are die hard anti-American far left radical Marxists.

They may be aware of how bad things are, though. One of the nephews is moving half his antique car collection to a safe location out of his present notoriously unsafe urban area of residence.


34 posted on 10/29/2011 7:53:18 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

What kind of idiot puts a styrofoam cup of hot coffee between their legs in a car?


35 posted on 10/29/2011 7:53:21 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I am not sure what the technical reason was but the book, “In Cold Blood” made it clear that the insurance company had no legal obligation to pay the claim.

Like you, I would have thought as soon as the agent accepted the check, they would have been covered.


36 posted on 10/29/2011 7:55:58 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AZhardliner

Agreed. Progressive is one of the most scummy companies on the planet. I had a accident that was clearly their customers fault with gross negligence by said customer that was reinforced by a police report. Progressive tried to pin the fault on me and make my insurer pay. I spent several fuming days on the phone with adjusters from both companies fighting that one. They are the epitome of sleaze.


37 posted on 10/29/2011 7:56:51 PM PDT by CarryaBigStick (My office is an Air Tractor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
One of my grand son's friends bought car insurance and got a dated receipt, he asked when his insurance was in effect and was told, "as soon as you pay". That night at 12:37 A.M., he totaled a $25,000 car. The insurer tried to get out of paying but he and his father went to court, with the receipt in hand and the company was ordered to pay up and pay attorney fees.
38 posted on 10/29/2011 8:06:16 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country but Herman Cain loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I don’t know. Maybe an idiot in a car without cup-holders.

Where the 3rd degree burns occur is not the issue. It’s that they happen at all.


39 posted on 10/29/2011 8:07:06 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Lawyer Janet Santillanes said that among the evidence jurors heard during the six-day trial was that Progressive altered its computer records...

Yet these same insurance companies go after those that commit fraud against them. Most go to jail.

Will ANYBODY from this pathetic excuse of an insurance company go to jail? Doubtful.

They should have been awarded triple the amount they were awarded. BANKRUPT THE BASTARDS I SAY!

40 posted on 10/29/2011 8:09:39 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson