It’s a classic false allegation and subsequent shakedown, is what it is.
Did you see this? He did nothing wrong. Amazing how people want to trash him for nothing. And the MSM was silent about 0bastard’s faggotry!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2800526/posts
Cain Details Gesture That Led To Sex Accusation
The Washington Examiner ^ | October 31, 2011 | Byron York Chief Political Correspondent
Posted on Monday, October 31, 2011 3:00:45 PM by Southnsoul
Cain spoke in response to detailed questioning from Fox News’ Greta van Susteren, who led Cain through the facts of the case in an extended interview. That interview was taped to be shown on Fox Monday night.
Cain told van Susteren that he remembered one woman who was a writer in the Association’s communications department. “I can’t even remember her name, but I do remember the formal allegation she made in terms of sexual harassment,” Cain said. “I turned it over to my general counsel and one of the ladies that worked for me, the woman in charge of human resources. They did investigate…and it was found to be baseless.”
Van Susteren asked Cain how often he saw the woman. “I might see her in the office because her office was on the same floor as my office,” Cain said. Van Susteren asked whether the woman traveled with Cain, who spent a lot of time on the road speaking to restaurant associations around the country. “No, never,” Cain said.
Van Susteren asked what Cain did that led to the accusation. There were reportedly more than one accusations in the complaint, but Cain said he recalled just one incident. “She was in my office one day, and I made a gesture saying — and I was standing close to her — and I made a gesture saying you are the same height as my wife. And I brought my hand up to my chin saying, ‘My wife comes up to my chin.’” At that point, Cain gestured with his flattened palm near his chin. “And that was put in there [the complaint] as something that made her uncomfortable,” Cain said, “something that was in the sexual harassment charge.”
(Excerpt) Read more at campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com ...
That’s obviously the most innocuous of the claims in the complaint, explained without any of the nuance or context by which, I would presume, the woman detailed it.
I don’t know. He could be innocent, he could be guilty, it could be a borderline case. But it’s two women, not one, and none of us knows the circumstances.
To say that when it’s multiple women and you haven’t heard—and can’t hear—their side of the story is ridiculous.
That’s what James Carville tried to get us to say when it was multiple claims against Bill Clinton.
He could be innocent or guilty, but we don’t know.