Skip to comments.
Lawyer: Cain May Have Violated Confidentiality of Harassment Settlement
NPR ^
| November 1, 2011
| Liz Halloran
Posted on 11/01/2011 11:53:01 AM PDT by maggief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: GreenAccord
"I can tell you also that I don't represent people who are trying to shake down employers." So HE'S the ONE attorney that won't, eh?
21
posted on
11/01/2011 12:01:34 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: maggief
“I’ve known her for a long time, and she’s happily married,” Bennett said, adding: “I can tell you also that I don’t represent people who are trying to shake down employers.” .............................................................=Typical Plaintiff Lawyer speak.
22
posted on
11/01/2011 12:01:45 PM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
(CAIN 2012, AMERICA ,LETS GET BACK TO "BUSINESS"! ( w/ Alan West as SOD too))
To: maggief
So how does this lawyer know that Cain was talking about an incident that he has knowledge of?
ML/NJ
23
posted on
11/01/2011 12:01:55 PM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: maggief
--Lawyer: Cain May Have Violated Confidentiality of Harassment Settlement--
I think what he means to say is that Lawyer: Cain May, or may not Have Violated Confidentiality of Harassment Settlement
24
posted on
11/01/2011 12:02:16 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: chrisser
Nope, not too soon.
The left is absolutely terrified of the prospect of Cain being 0bama’s opponent.
90% of their campaign goes down the tubes right there.
25
posted on
11/01/2011 12:03:16 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: maggief
Without having the agreement in hand, Bennett says he doesn't know what it specifically says about Cain's obligations under the non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses.Another example of the unsubstantiated speculation that passes for journalism these days.
26
posted on
11/01/2011 12:03:16 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yan
To: Why So Serious
A few weeks ago my wife said, “Man, MSNBC really hates Cain, he must be pretty good.”
27
posted on
11/01/2011 12:03:58 PM PDT
by
Drill Thrawl
(The patient is too far gone to save.)
To: Why So Serious
IOW, judge a man by the enemies he makes. :-D
28
posted on
11/01/2011 12:04:47 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: MNJohnnie
Betchas some of the checks had “Politico” on the memo line.
To: maggief
by washington, does the writer mean DC or the state?
30
posted on
11/01/2011 12:06:54 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: basil
HE didn’t fire her. The restaurant association let her go with severance pay.
If Cain didn’t sign anything, then he’s under no obligation to maintain confidentiality, but the other person still is.
31
posted on
11/01/2011 12:07:13 PM PDT
by
Marie
(Cain 9s Have Teeth)
To: maggief
Bennett said, adding: "I can tell you also that I don't represent people who are trying to shake down employers."
I don't know if he has any legal basis considering the female's name is still confidential. BUT, watch her name to be mysteriously leaked in the near future.......
I saw this coming, Cain was caught in a two way trap, damned if he does, damned if he doesn't......
To: TSgt
Weasel attorney or is that redundant? 98% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
TS
33
posted on
11/01/2011 12:07:47 PM PDT
by
The Shrew
(www.wintersoldier.com; www.tstrs.com; The Truth Shall Set You Free!)
To: chrisser
Now its starting to sound like a Dem leak ...Romney was, is, and always will be a dem.
34
posted on
11/01/2011 12:08:11 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yan
To: maggief; Grampa Dave
It wasn't a formal "settlement" but rather a simple "agreement." That is NOT a distinction without a difference!!!
Any competent lowyer should know and understand that!!!
35
posted on
11/01/2011 12:08:35 PM PDT
by
SierraWasp
(I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
To: maggief
It is "inconceivable," Bennett told NPR, that his client was motivated by money, [translation]: 'I'm not saying it isn't true - but its "inconceivable" (so don't you dare conceive of it...)'...
...or by a romantic interest in Cain.
[translation]: 'But I'll keep tossing those sexual innuendos out there, even though this doesn't have anything to do with sex...'
"I've known her for a long time, and she's happily married," Bennett said,
Fine, and I like pie...
... adding: "I can tell you also that I don't represent people who are trying to shake down employers."
[translation]: 'I could tell you that ... but it would be lying... And we lawyers never lie...'
36
posted on
11/01/2011 12:08:47 PM PDT
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: maggief
Don’t make me write Cain another campaign check.
37
posted on
11/01/2011 12:09:02 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: maggief
You can always tell when a lawyer is lying. It happens as soon as he starts talking.
38
posted on
11/01/2011 12:09:43 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow demorats.)
To: maggief
The RinoCrats are gettin’ desperate...reachin’ for technicalities...
39
posted on
11/01/2011 12:10:01 PM PDT
by
mo
To: maggief
Bennett said his client, a graduate of an Ivy League university, worked in professional positions in government for many years... "Well, there's a *****in' surprise...."
40
posted on
11/01/2011 12:11:42 PM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson