Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beelzebubba

I have to go with post#40 on this, in terms of “it makes a lot of sense”.

But Cain better have some hard evidence, or he’s in big trouble... bigger than the original “lady trouble”.


64 posted on 11/02/2011 1:33:48 PM PDT by samtheman (Newt, can you refute... global warming? You really have to do that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman

What kind of hard evidence can you have in a ‘she-said, he-said’?


117 posted on 11/02/2011 1:57:15 PM PDT by Spirit of Liberty (http://www.honorflight.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman

I agree, Cain better be 100% sure he’s right.

If he is, then it’s a good strategy. Go after your accuser and get it over as quickly as possible.

It’s now clear that the leaker’s strategy was to drip this story out over time to keep it alive. An anonymous source Sunday, another source Tuesday, not another anonymous source with something else. This could go on forever, drip drip, drip drip.

I don’t see both Perry’s and Cain’s campaign surviving this now. It’s one or the other.


222 posted on 11/02/2011 2:38:30 PM PDT by Brookhaven (Just say #So? to the mainstream media smears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson