Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Members to Super Committee: GO BIG (40 RINOS join 60 RATS)
U.S. House Representative Mark Simpson (R-ID) ^ | 11/2/11 | Mark Simpson (R-ID)

Posted on 11/03/2011 6:17:17 AM PDT by harpu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: harpu

It should be automatically assumed that any congressperson recommending “revenue” increases as part of a deficit reduction package has NO intention of cutting spending.


21 posted on 11/03/2011 7:05:23 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

“Everything is on the table” = raise taxes and cut defense. Claim billions in “savings” in welfare/foodstamps by reducing fraud and upgrading computerized systems.


22 posted on 11/03/2011 7:15:47 AM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Et tu Ron Paul?


23 posted on 11/03/2011 7:26:03 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Any year in which there is a budget deficit, all of the members of the current House and Senate may not run for reelection.

Problem 1: The House runs every two years. One third of the Senate runs every two years. So none of them are running for reelection every other year.

Problem 2: The period of when Congress runs for election is fixed by a little thing called the United States Constitution.

Problem 3: Silly, impossible, make-believe fixes are soooo much easier than real, hard choices.

24 posted on 11/03/2011 7:34:00 AM PDT by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Is the super committee like the czars? Even though they are elected; how come they are seem like they are representing the government rather than the people? Is this some new type of government and what is it modeled after?


25 posted on 11/03/2011 7:39:23 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Turner has turned on us! Into a big Weiner!


26 posted on 11/03/2011 7:42:34 AM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: harpu

axxholes! Reducing the deficit by raising taxes is no answer at all. Just more of the same old crap.


27 posted on 11/03/2011 7:56:29 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
"A Democrat on cable news this morning, was very excited about the willingness of the Republicans to raise revenue. Said it was a big break through."

He's going to get served when the Tea Party Caucus joins hands with the Progressives to block this dopey bill.

28 posted on 11/03/2011 8:35:11 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
"The biggest concern is that they do nothing and Defense gets whacked for another 600 Billion."

I agree, but if it comes to that at least Entitlements take an equal percentage hit. It may be that it takes this much constriction to force the States (namely, California) to reel in the freebies. Contraction is inevitable.

29 posted on 11/03/2011 8:39:53 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Members to Super Committee: GO GREECE
30 posted on 11/03/2011 8:48:03 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill
1) Did a quick scan and did not notice any conservative names that I recognized.

62. Paul, Ron (R-TX)

Ron Paul would probably like voters to think he's conservative. Now that he's stated that he won't run for re-election, I guess he's done pretending. If we could just get him off the GOP debate stage so that there's more time for serious candidates to speak, that would make me happy.

31 posted on 11/03/2011 8:48:27 AM PDT by lonevoice (The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers, impeach we much. We will much about that be committed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Gives ya a warm feeeling,, right in the old pocketbook.


32 posted on 11/03/2011 8:49:49 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
I don't think that's what he had in mind. What he was saying is that any representative who was in office during any given year is flagged as not being eligible for reelection. Even if we buy your premise, there would be huge pressures to balance the budget every two years at least.
33 posted on 11/03/2011 9:10:18 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Extra-Congressional legislation is illegal.


34 posted on 11/03/2011 9:31:08 AM PDT by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

No Washington was bought off, we need to sell it off..


35 posted on 11/03/2011 9:54:14 AM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Are you surprised?


36 posted on 11/03/2011 10:09:22 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Smokescreen for raising taxes and fair share mental mentality.

Scanning the list of Republican signees, I don't see many recognizably conservative names.

Which makes me suspicious.

Suggesting that this is a "moderate" initiative, a "bi-partisan" effort...to raise taxes.

37 posted on 11/03/2011 10:12:45 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
$4T of the right types of cuts will save the country.

This group of Congressmen -- RINO Republicans and "moderate" Democrats -- probably isn't thinking in terms of "spending cuts".

Instead, they're probably focussed on "tax increases".

38 posted on 11/03/2011 10:14:52 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: harpu
the congress is abdicating their responsibility by forming this committee, and all the people on this committee will be gaining bigger retaierment bucks because they are on this committee, congress needs to do their job and just say no! I bet that if they cut to deep they will be taken to the USSC just like the line item veto and overturned.
39 posted on 11/03/2011 1:53:35 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
congress is abdicating their responsibility

Yep, and all for political expediency. They can go home and tell their constituents "I didn't vote to raise taxes, cut spending, etc., it was the super-committee."
40 posted on 11/03/2011 1:56:04 PM PDT by DTxAg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson