Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cain chief-of-staff walks back Perry accusations
The Hill ^ | 11/3/2011 01:34 PM ET | Justin Sink

Posted on 11/03/2011 11:04:33 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last
To: katiedidit1
Wilson said for legal reasons, he can not discuss details of the incident.

WHAT legal reasons??? Without details, this is nothing more than just a teaser to keep the story going.

Just keep up the foodfight, Republican establishmentarians. You're probably well on your way to getting a conservative 3rd-party intervention in 2012.

61 posted on 11/03/2011 12:05:17 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Hurrah me boys, for FREEDOM! `Tis the risin` o` the moon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

All of these Cain “mistakes” in expressing himself is happening because he is not a politician. Most conservatives have said they don’t like politicians. This is what you get. You either want a politician who knows what and what not to say in public or you want an ordinary normal mistake prone human being.


62 posted on 11/03/2011 12:05:44 PM PDT by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Yesterday: ".....Since Politico released an attack story based on anonymous accusers, which was almost certainly provided to them by the Rick Perry campaign..."

Today: "Until we get all the facts..."

Block being a Blockhead??

63 posted on 11/03/2011 12:08:22 PM PDT by taraytarah ( Get acquainted with a Proven Leader. HermanCainExpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

I find it rather interesting that Bill Clinton was known to have more than likely raped at least one woman possibly two, beat the crap out of another in a parking lot, and accosted numerous others, but the press couldn’t have cared less.

Now unspecified rumors by unspecified people have caused Cain no limit of grief. And what’s more, the good folks at FRee Republic are now the best friends of the folks who are instigating this double standard.

Why yes, Cain has a real problem. LOL, perhaps it’s the Conservative movement that has a problem. No specific charges, no named accusers, all a vapor trail at this point, and some of our people are writing Cain off.

LOL, with FReepers like these, who needs D.U., MoveOn.Org, Huffington Post... et al.


64 posted on 11/03/2011 12:08:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obyema 2012 - he has addition deficit disorder... (not my line, but a great one to repeat))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Cain and his underlings are not handling this thing well. But more importantly, Cain was not aware that China has nukes.(And don’t think the libs won’t use this in any future political campaign ads). I would vote for Cain in heartbeat over Obama, but I’m becoming less and less impressed by the prospects of a President Cain.
I could care less about the so called "sexual harrassment but I AM concerned that Cain was so naive that he thought this would not come out and that he was so unprepared when it did. I am REALLY concerned about the China comment. How the hell could a man running for President not know that China is a nuclear power. Sorry, I'm done with this guy, can't we just draft Sarah at the Republican convention? 2012 is starting to look like that disaster that the Mayans predicted.
65 posted on 11/03/2011 12:12:18 PM PDT by conservaterian (Sarah/DeMint '12-XXX= Now what? Cain?XX Guess not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Marie

LOL...

He definitely needs to bring in more top level staff to handle situations like this and general media relations.

Block brought him this far but he needs help. The campaign has to expand and Block and Cain can still do the Strategy and overall Thrust of the Campaign...but he needs help on execution and implementation.

Hell I’d work for him for food as I’m semi-retired at 50.

I think he’ll be ok, but you only get so many mulligans.


66 posted on 11/03/2011 12:16:34 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Mr. Block sounds like he ‘aint too bright. Amateur hour.


67 posted on 11/03/2011 12:25:22 PM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

Agree


68 posted on 11/03/2011 12:27:44 PM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I can’t help but stand here on the sidelines chuckling to myself over all of this. Here we are with a gaggle of candidates that HAVEN’T been vetted, re-vetted, and vetted again like...


69 posted on 11/03/2011 12:29:56 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madinmadtown
“Do you know what I think is really dishonorable? That neither the Perry nor the Romney campaigns came out against the vagueness of the Politico charges against Cain. It is this type of “gotcha” journalism that keeps decent people out of politics. And neither the Romney camp nor the Perry camp has spoken out against sullying reputations nor the feeding frenzy of this type of story....

I agree, because Romney and Cain came out against the Perry place nword rock story didn't they?

Gee-sh, politics is nasty until we get a nominee, then everyone gets in line, including FReepers. Of course they enjoy their fellow Republicans getting beat up in the media. It seems FReepers have forgotten that we are fighting a bigger fight than amongst each other. But in the end all unite because Obama has to be defeated.

70 posted on 11/03/2011 12:33:13 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

This just seems to be Cain’s thing. Say something one day, take it back the next and then demand we all just move on. Good Grief.


71 posted on 11/03/2011 12:40:42 PM PDT by txroadkill (FreeRepublic.com- "A Wretched Hive of Scum and Villany" - Zotted Romney Troll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txroadkill
This just seems to be Cain’s thing. Say something one day, take it back the next and then demand we all just move on. Good Grief.
Not good.
Not good.
Not good.

This is exactly what I've been afraid of.

Is it possible?

Just as Perry can't change his dimwit conversational style, is it possible Cain just can't shake his foot-in-mouth disease?

Time to look more closely at Newt.

72 posted on 11/03/2011 12:44:39 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Cain was not aware that China has nukes.

As long as his Secretary of State knows that China has nukes, I don’t care. Cain never said he knew every knok and cranny of being a President. What he has is principles and morals and that to me is more important. He will have a very strong staff that will take care of the minute details. I don’t worry about Cain a single bit.


73 posted on 11/03/2011 12:45:03 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Signalman; wolficatZ
Cain was not aware that China has nukes,

Debunked lie. Some are repeating it as fact, because they can’t be bothered doing a few SECONDS of typing in a search engine.

“Herman Cain spent the Vietnam war evaluating the capabilities of the Chinese to deliver a nuclear weapon onto the heads of our forces in South Vietnam.

He examined the test launches of the Dongfeng 1 (SS-1) and plotted out the trajectories for a 500kg warheads.

When China started testing the Dongfeng 2 (CSS-1) Cain plotted out the trajectories and capabilities of it’s delivery of 15 kiloton nuclear weapons.

Both of these missiles were provided to the PRC by the Soviets, Cain analysed data from the Russian test launches and determined the risk to U.S. troops in SE Asia.

Cain also observed the development of China’s first domestically produced missile, Dongfeng 3 (CSS-2) and plotted out it’s use with China’s 15-20KT fissile devices as well as China’s new thermonuclear devices.

Finally, Cain was involved in the determination that China’s Dongfeng 4 (CSS-3) was capable of delivering both fissile and thermonuclear devices to both Moscow and Guam as well as cover the entire deployment of U.S. forces in SE Asia.

Cain is well aware of China’s nuclear missile capability, the only reasonable conclusion is that Cain was indeed referring to China’s attempts to develop and sail their first nuclear aircraft carrier and their attempts to develop more dangerous nuclear cruisers.”

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/01/cain-on-china-theyre-trying-to-develop-nuclear-capability/

74 posted on 11/03/2011 12:47:58 PM PDT by j_tull (I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Perry’s biggest problem is that he’s used to preaching to the choir. Texas has large numbers of smart conservatives, many of them Evangelicals, and I don’t think he realized that he couldn’t necessarily take this show on the road. I’m not sure he’ll be able to recover.

I used to think Cain’s major problem was foot-in-mouth, but now I’m thinking it’s a bad case of Clintonitis. That is, lying and hoping his personal charm will carry the day. Not good, and frankly, I wouldn’t vote for him. I would have originally, even though I didn’t like the cult of personality, but this episode has revealed that he’s simply not up to the job.

That said, I really don’t know who to look at. I like Gingrich more than rhe others, but remember that the GOP leadership abandoned him when the Dems attacked (it was the perfectly innocent book deal that they used to get him to step down). And I think the GOP leadership is committed to Romney.

Among the so-called “second tier,” there’s nobody I think would be able to improve significantly.


75 posted on 11/03/2011 1:11:47 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
saying that he would "accept" the claim by a former staffer

...now that the damage has been done.

Standard procedure: accusation on page A1, retraction on page C25.

76 posted on 11/03/2011 1:18:09 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Of the declared candidates: (1) Perry, (2) Cain. I'll happily vote for either if he's the nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
What disgusting people Cain and Block are. They make politics even dirtier then it is. DISGUSTING!

To throw out accusations like they have done and then think it is ok and no harm done they can go jump in the lake or worse as far as I care. I have ZERO respect for Cain and his campaign people, they are as sleazy as Romney ever was.

NO to Romney and NO to Cain! Never!

Give me Rick Perry or Sarah.

77 posted on 11/03/2011 1:18:12 PM PDT by Katarina (Rick Perry the Best man for President ! NEVER Romney! And no thank you Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Thumbs UP to you MizSterious...had the very same conversation with a few freepers. Getting hard to vet/discuss our candidates without vicious attacks. To think I was gung ho over this election but now I am just sick...


78 posted on 11/03/2011 1:21:30 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
I disagree.
One of the things that is most despicable about the Cain frenzy is the desire for the confidentiality agreements to be opened.
A dangerous precedent against the rule-of-law that we know the current White House occupier has taken electoral advantage of in the past. A request that the restaurant association pass on the confidentiality agreements undermines any legal agreement the association has made. It is dangerous territory.
Some people have long memories and they will sit out an election rather than vote for people who did not stand up and show some integrity.
Republicans are not the same robots that the Democrats are. Although Perry and Romney really are more Democrat-lite than Republican....but maybe that is what the Democrats have been counting on all along.
79 posted on 11/03/2011 1:27:57 PM PDT by madinmadtown (Marx, the patron saint of blame, envy and destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: j_tull

“Finally, Cain was involved in the determination that China’s Dongfeng 4 (CSS-3) was capable of delivering both fissile and thermonuclear devices to both Moscow and Guam as well as cover the entire deployment of U.S. forces in SE Asia...

...Cain is well aware of China’s nuclear missile capability, the only reasonable conclusion is that Cain was indeed referring to China’s attempts to develop and sail their first nuclear aircraft carrier and their attempts to develop more dangerous nuclear cruisers.”

Anybody who thinks Cain doesn’t know China has nukes is just a moron...no better than lil Joey Scarborough and Mika (my daddy is Zbig).

Being fairly well read on nuclear arms myself, I’d also posit that the Chinese are attempting to increase their accuracy and MIRV capability as well as longer range missiles. All of which could be included in Cain’s, “nuclear capability” remark.

Now the Palinization will begin...SNL will have a black comedian say “China doesn’t have nukes” and intellectual heavyweights like Mika, Capeheart, and EdShow will make it real on TV and print.

So, step up heavyweight Freepers emulate your daddy EdShow.


80 posted on 11/03/2011 1:29:24 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson