Forbes worked with Perry on the flat tax plan. Forbes is not involved with Cain’s 9-9-9 plan.
Forbes also endorsed Rick Perry.
Cain was talking about a Forbes Magazine article. An article which mostly reported what Cain said. And then he used that to suggest it was all Forbes Magazine’s fault that Cain falsely accused Anderson.
Thanks, I stand corrected. As the flat tax plans are similar in substance, I assumed they were the same.
Forbes is Perry’s guy, so this still doesn’t make sense to me since Steve is editor in chief of the Magazine.