Provide even a single shred of evidence to back up your accusations.You keep demanding this of people who are NOT saying they believe the original allegations were true or justified.
What some of us ARE saying is that Cain handled this very badly.
How can you not understand the difference.
1. The original charges are bogus and unsubstantiated and completely without merit. --- I agree.
2. The original charges resulted in legal settlements that (though sealed) are a matter of public record and Cain should have been ready for them to come out and been better prepared to deal with them. --- You don't seem to be able to understand this 2nd point. It's not that you disagree with it, you just don't get it. You keep saying "prove it", even though I agree with #1.
So you agree Cain has been maliciously and unfairly attacked with bogus claims, yet all you can muster is “he should have handled it better”? Good don’t vote for him. Maybe we’ll get lucky and get a scumbag candidate who is good at covering up real crimes.