IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.
IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************
Posted on 11/05/2011 8:50:22 AM PDT by casinva
Heads up all ye who want change from another Obama term in 2012. There’s only one man for that job: Rick Perry. Voters said so in Wisconsin.
Perry topped Obama 46% to 42% in a Rasmussen poll. Should Obama run against Mitt Romney, Obama would win 45% to 41%. Should Obama run against Herman Cain, Obama would win 47% to 41%. The poll makes a case for Perry if Americans really want to see Obama out.
The Rasmussen poll surveyed 500 Wisconsin voters by phone, not a sampling of voters nationwide. But the trendline is up for Perry and a bellwether as the GOP candidate who can ‘take it away’ next November.
The rest of the GOP field is losing its glitter. Meanwhile, Perry continues his ascent toward the top; this, amid purported poor performances at debate. What’s going on with that?
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Ping please.
who paid for this “research”?
Even the scum on the bottom of our polling barrel now beat Obama.
IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.
IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************
Beg to differ. Perry will get slaughtered by Obama in the debates.
Hmmmmmm.......... that sounds very suspect to me. If that poll is accurate, I’m thinking that “liberal” Wisconsin wants Perry to be the GOP nominee. “Please, please don’t throw me in the brier patch.”
Even the second biggest liberal after Romney running for President can beat Obama.
Oh, so I’m just supposed to ignore the dirtbag Perry’s attempted lynching of Mr. Cain? Not, not and not.
I’ll give Perry the benefit of the doubt for the upcoming debate. Perry will be better Nov 9 than he has been all previous. His interviews have been particularly strong lately. He has a tendency to get better and stronger as his campaigns ramp up. I’ve seen it four times here in Texas.
Actually he probably wouldn’t. The reason Perry didn’t do well in the debates so far is 9 people on stage, 30 seconds to answer, and as the only one who actually has policy positions it’s pretty hard to answer in 30 second sound bites.
Good sentiment, but I would re-phrase it a little: “God, please grace us with the wisdom and the courage to fix this.”
Perry is on the comeback. It will drive his detractors and FR crazy!
Perry is sawing the legs out from under the zero admin as we speak. Why people don’t recognize his intent and ongoing mission to rollback and undo zero is beyond me.
My rephrase suggestion would be “God, let Your will be done”.
No. The reason Perry did poorly in the debates is because he is a moron with no substance and is on the wrong side of many issues.
Wow, is that creepy or what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.