Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barbour: Initiative 31 bad for business
The Memphis Commercial Appeal ^ | 11/5/11 | Henry Baily

Posted on 11/05/2011 12:22:30 PM PDT by Sybeck1

Barbour: Initiative 31 bad for business 'It'll cost us a whole lot of jobs,' governor warns

Firing back at critics of using eminent domain as a tool for economic development, Gov. Haley Barbour says DeSoto County voters armed with facts shouldn't be afraid to shoot down Initiative 31 on the Tuesday ballot.

They should be afraid of the economic impact if the proposal passes: "It'll cost us a whole lot of jobs. It would be felt in DeSoto County and all across the state," he said.

"People shouldn't be misled into thinking this will protect their property from eminent domain," said Barbour, noting lengthy exceptions including roads, bridges, drainage, schools and hospitals. "If people read the list, they'd understand why 99 percent of land ever taken by eminent domain before still can be taken under the initiative."

Also, the governor said, "in the rare instances where eminent domain has been used for economic development projects, it has been for major job creation."

He noted the huge Ingalls Shipbuilding operation in Pascagoula, the nearby Stennis Space Center, the Nissan plant in Canton and Toyota's new site in Blue Springs.

He added that the option is used sparingly and that in DeSoto County, "not one acre of land" has been taken by eminent domain for economic development.

Barbour's comments follow Monday's DeSoto County stop by representatives of the Mississippi Farm Bureau, including president Randy Knight, on a statewide tour calling for support of the constitutional measure to ban the eminent domain-economic development option.

Barbour pointed out that Knight had written in a recent guest column for the Clarion-Ledger newspaper in Jackson that while the option might be a problem later, "it isn't a problem in this state now."

"We don't need to be changing the state Constitution to fix something that's not a problem," Barbour said.

Mississippi is one of seven states holding the option.

What the initiative would "fix" into the state Constitution would be elimination of a tool that has benefited thousands of working Mississippians, and adding a disadvantage, he said. For big developments, Mississippi competes primarily with Alabama, Tennessee and Arkansas, which use eminent domain as the Magnolia State does.

"We wouldn't have the Toyota plant if it wasn't for eminent domain," Barbour said.

In his column, Knight added: "Tough economic times force officials to make difficult decisions. The chance to increase tax revenue at the expense of someone's private property rights might be too hard to resist."

Barbour responds: "We already have a set of rules for protecting private property that is among the strictest in the U.S."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: barbour; eminentdomain; ms

1 posted on 11/05/2011 12:22:32 PM PDT by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WKB; DrewsMum; Tupelo; mstar; jdirt; Vietnam Vet From New Mexico; wardaddy; KLT; montesquiue; ...

Initiative 31 ping


2 posted on 11/05/2011 12:24:02 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (Mitt Romney, a piss poor choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Sit down and shut up fat boy.


3 posted on 11/05/2011 12:26:59 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
Also, the governor said, "in the rare instances where eminent domain has been used for economic development projects, it has been for major job creation."

That anyone who claims an (R) behind his name would say this is baffling.

4 posted on 11/05/2011 12:31:14 PM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
Denying the government a license to steal would be bad for business?

Depends upon whose business you are concerned about.

If you are concerned about the business of the government/corporate-complex, you are absolutely correct. Allowing the government/corporate-complex to steal from non-members of the government/corporate-complex gives the government/corporate-complex a distinct, insurmountable advantage.

Putting them all in prison would negate that advantage.

5 posted on 11/05/2011 1:31:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.<sup>®</sup>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Click The Pic To Support FR

"Posterity, you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it."
John Adams

6 posted on 11/05/2011 1:51:36 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
"People shouldn't be misled into thinking this will protect their property from eminent domain," said Barbour, noting lengthy exceptions including roads, bridges, drainage, schools and hospitals. "

One by one, Republicans whom I have long admired show their contempt for us.

Yes, Haley, we know that eminent domain will still exist for public works. We just don't want our land taken by the government to give to another guy who's promised to name a building after you.

And, yes, Haley, 99% of the reasons government can take your property will still exist, but 90% of the actual takings will stop. He thinks we're dopes.

7 posted on 11/05/2011 2:54:43 PM PDT by BfloGuy (Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
FU Haley... I have lived under the threat from Eminent Domain for 6 years because of your sorry fat ass... screw you... we will pass it and we will override your veto this time... you pos corporatist... Haley is exactly the kind of republican that causes many independents to hate the party... anything for a corporation huh Haley? I have nothing against corporations... but Haley puts them above property rights for Americans. FU Haley and in case I did not make myself clear... FU Haley!

LLS

8 posted on 11/05/2011 4:15:41 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("Americans are hungry to feel once again a sense of mission and greatness." Ronaldo Magnus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson