So, they have dug all weekend, come up with the right price, and now they find a woman who says he did something while she went to him for help on another matter. Apparently she filed no claim back then.
It will be a big “he said she said,” with a “notable” attorney (known for going after similar stories) to help this woman through it.
Sickening, disgusting, and damnable lies, IMHO.
He’s been running for President for a year. It’s been many years since this occurred. And yet now is the time they decide to make their allegations, and in this case, they’ve found some woman willing (I presume for the right price) to step forward.
Never a word about the homosexual man Obama had an affair with and Rev Wright had murdered. Or Aruba Tommy and Jesse Jackson? Never a word.
Gloria Allred - has turned being a publicity whore into a science!
...you got that right....except that they have been "shopping" for the right price since the first allegations a couple of weeks ago. I guess this woman has been assured that nobody is going to be able to question her to any great extent.
If Cain can file a suit and make this "lady" have to testify under oath, then we could see how far the allegations go....
Morally Cain seems to be better or equal to every candidate with the possible exception of Perry.
I hope the allegations aren't true. But it's slim pickens out there.
You get enough “he said she said” stuff and he is sunk.
The media double standard is one thing.
But the comprehensive hypocrisy of the Democrats is another. They, including Joel P. Bennett (a Clinton pal) and Gloria Alred (a NAG gal), have no problem with a notorious rapist in the White House. Not only in the White House, but pursuing his sexual crimes and misadventures in the Oval Office, while on the phone with a congressman about a war that was ongoing.
The Libs argued without shame that none of the this conduct had ANY negative impact on the President, the presidency or the nation. It was “private.” It did not affect the president’s character or fitness for office.
Even lying about it under oath was not a problem for Libs — because it was “only sex” — real, honest-to-goodness SEX acts — and “only sex” was, basically, meaningless, both morally, ethically and legally.
All of a sudden these same people show up to flack for the idea that making a woman uncomfortable makes a man unfit for the presidency.
I’m not suggesting I’m willing to have the Clinton “standard” apply to our nominee. But the logical non sequitur here is massive.
Reason no one “remembered” about those “sexual advances” until now is no one thought Cain would get this far.
I don’t care how many women come forward...he’d got my vote. I think those accusing Cain are as reliable as that scabby creature that’s claiming Justin Bieber is her baby-daddy. (Last photo I saw of JB’s accuser..she had a nasty canket sore on her upper lip...YUCK!)