Allred will NEVER let the accuser go off script. No questions for her, just reading prepared statements.
She worked for the NRA Educational Foundation (or, "NRAEF") which is a separate organization from the NRA itself, presumably for tax purposes. From the website, it looks like the NRAEF is based in Chicago, whereas the NRA is based in DC.
Another question would be why he took her to the NRA to show her around if she had already worked there before?
****************************************
She didn’t work at NRA headquarters in DC.
She worked National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation
http://www.nraef.org/
175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1500, Chicago, IL 60604-2814. 1.800.765.2122, or in Chicagoland 312.715.1010
She knew of Cain through NRA events.
*snip*
Bialek, a Republican, said she had met the charismatic Cain at several restaurant association events.
She said Cain was charming and attentive to both her and her boyfriend at these events, so when she was fired from her job, her boyfriend suggested Bialek reach out to Cain.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/herman-cain-sexual-harassment-accuser-sharon-bialek-breaks-silence-gloria-allred-press-conference-article-1.973669
Levin cuts right through all the chit. That’s why he’s The Great One.
How did Cain know what hotel/motel she was staying at and how could he upgrade her room without permission from the person, her boyfriend according to her, who booked it? No hotel/motel would go along with that. According to her he didn’t even know why she was there until they were at the restaurant.
Between Mark Levin taking apart the story (he says this is why you get details, to take the story apart) and Bill Kurtis taking apart the history (of Sharon Gypsy-Tramp-and-Thief) Herman Cain benefits from Death Star blowback once more.
You guys do realize that this is going to keep coming till they sink Cain. Even if they all get debunked the energy the media will use (with tacit support from others in the GOP) to keep the stories about Cain to three things:
1) Cain responded to an earlier allegation.
2) Cain is ignoring an earlier allegetaion.
3) Wow! Here is yet another allegation! That makes seventeen for Cain! Roundtable for half an hour with four talking heads about how he is sunk!
People in Iowa will turn on him after a certain point. The only chance Cain has is to somehow get some hard evidence linking a rival campaign or the DNC to a pay-out or a total fabrication of one or more of the stories. If he can do that he’ll be bullet proof, otherwise I’m afraid it will be time to pick a new anti-Romney.
The problem for Democrats is that not even one of these women can be a plant, or Cain is inoculated on this issue. Thanks, Gloria!
Also, this trick should only work once. Team Obama already had an operative violate a court order to leak Ryan’s divorce records the last time he had a conservative challenger (Senate race).
If Mark can’t get his own questions answered, perhaps he can get mine answered!
She lives in Chicago and out of work. Her boyfriend’s parents live in NJ and he comes up w/the idea for her to ask Cain about a job.
She calls him and tells him she was let go and he said he didn’t know that. Why did she feel the NEED to take a trip to DC to ask him about seeking work for her? Why didn’t she ask him on the phone?
And since she wasn’t working - they arrange a trip to her boyfriends parents - from Chicago to NJ - and she takes a bus to DC. And her boyfriend pays for her room. All this money and time spent (being out of work) for something that could have been taken care of when she got him on the phone?
It’s no wonder Cain may have asked ‘what are you here for’? WTF? Her boyfriend says Cain was impressed w/her - so he’ll pay for her to go to DC for a cup of coffee w/him to see if he can help you? Right. The boyfriend knew what he was pushing for - climb the ladder however you can. I wonder if that boyfriend is the one with the paternity suite - her son is 13 years old.
Anyway - why did she feel the NEED to go to DC for a cup of coffee to ask him about a job? What was she looking for that she couldn’t get with a phone call asking the same thing?
And did you notice she didn't say “stop” at first, she said “I have a boyfriend”. So by her own words if she didn't have a boyfriend....
And Allred looked pissed when she says “but I have a boyfriend”, because that was off script.
Herman Cain said on Jimmy Kimmel he immediately called his wife after the press conference as he was in CA for a speech and she said “I now they're lying, we've been married 42 years and you're not like that.” Which makes me think she knows the guy isn't into public displays of sex in a car.
Bttt
When a CBS reporter defends Cain, you know this entire story is complete BS.
Last week the left’s smear machine spent their time with the Podesta associated lawyer trying to make a big issue out of the alleged “harrassment” claims that we heard about.
I imagine they did all they could to try and coerce the people that made those claims to come out. For whatever reason that only those persons know, they decided not to.
Could be they were asked to embellish and make those allegations more salacious than they were. Remember at first we heard that the complaint against Cain was not overtly sexual in nature.
By the end of the week those complaints were spun as being somewhat sexual.
So, last week didn’t work at taking Cain down. We saw the weekend dem hack machine discuss how there were really no faces ar actual claims to get people to believe it.
so........
They call Gloria and the Chi-town dem hacks to come up with a name and face. Hence Bialek. Only thing I could believe with Bialek is that she didn’t seek out Gloria Allred all at once because she cares about sexual assault. The woman is shady and needs money. Gloria and the dems sought her out and they knew she would do anything for the bucks.
I wouild wager to say they have had plans in advance on all of the potentials. That is why the dems were so upset when our field took so long to set.
This particlar story I don’t believe at all. It was too convenient.
I also believe this woman would not go to a Tea Party and throw her arms around a man who sexually assaulted her. If this happened I would believe it was done to try and get some DNA to plant in order to give some credence to this false claim. After all, who knows how long they have had plans to take down candidates in the hopper?
“To Kill a Mockingbird” bump