Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
The sad part; this stuff has zero to do with how someone can govern.

We are electing slick debaters. Almost like auditions to be actors.

12 posted on 11/09/2011 9:00:41 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HereInTheHeartland
The sad part; this stuff has zero to do with how someone can govern.

We are electing slick debaters. Almost like auditions to be actors.


Welcome to the last 150 years of politics. Have they become more important over the last 60 years of television, sure, but you want somebody who can communicate, and who can go in front of a hostile crowd and articulate what they believe in and why they believe in it.

People complain about these debates, but I love them, because it's providing a good opportunity for some candidates to sharpen their communication skills and whoever gets this nomination needs to be ready to mix it up with Nobama and the MSM.

My only problem is that after tonight, I can see more and more moderators shying away from engaging Gingrich or Paul.
46 posted on 11/09/2011 10:27:31 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

“The sad part; this stuff has zero to do with how someone can govern.”

Absolutely. If I wanted performance art I’d buy tickets to see the Ice Capades. What do people expect of their nominee, a whole lot of image and a little bit of substance? Are we really that shallow? I’m not just talking about Perry either.

An onstage gaffe or awkward moment may cause some of the audience to wince, cringe or feel uncomfortable but since when has the public developed this preference to have a used car salesman give them the business?


58 posted on 11/10/2011 2:40:42 AM PST by equaviator ( "There's a (datum) plane on the horizon coming in...see it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: HereInTheHeartland

We are electing slick debaters. Almost like auditions to be actors.

Whose is the we you speak of. I had no say in how the process goes and you didn’t either. The Republican nominees EASILY could have gotten together and decided to not do any debates. They made the decision together to have 100 debates or whatever the number is. This is ALL in their hands not the voters. The voters are just watching what THEY themselves decided. If not for the debates, Perry probably would be the nominee, but HE MADE THE DECISION ALONG WITH THE OTHERS TO DO THESE DEBATES!!!! I don’t feel sorry for any of them and don’t take responsibility in their decisions either.


62 posted on 11/10/2011 6:25:07 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson