Posted on 11/09/2011 11:14:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The lynching of Herman Cain has reached heights comparable with the oak tree that liberals wish they could hang minority conservatives from.
In the great tradition of Clarence Thomas and Sarah Palin, the left has decided to add Herman Cain to the list of those who need to be set on fire and hung from a tree simply for existing and breathing while being a minority conservative.
Anonymous women have accused Herman Cain of bad behavior of an inappropriate sexual nature. Now a woman has finally decided to come forward. To make the situation even more highly charged and explosive, bottom feeder Gloria Allred is representing the newest woman pretending to be a victim.
Perhaps Anita Hill was not available.
I don’t care what this newest woman being coached by America’s worst man-hater not named Hillary Clinton has to say. She waited almost two decades until Mr. Cain was at his highest peak to date and then came forward for her fifteen minutes of fame.
As for those trying to destroy Mr. Cain, every single liberal critic should be taken into a room with nothing but white walls, a small television set, and a VCR with a videotape of Bill Clinton....
(Excerpt) Read more at communities.washingtontimes.com ...
Agreed.
Anyone who sincerely wants to know why, and who did not see the Lincoln-Douglas style debate last Saturday, should give it a look.
A formidable team.
Herman Cain has stated on a number of occasions that 2 complaints were filed against him for sexual harassment while he was chairman of NRAss.
At the Steve King do tonight the three fellows from respectively Rick Perry, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum were rather lonely-looking.The biggest reaction was the call to rip out Obamacare and Dodd-Frank and a host of abominations foisted upon us by Obama, Reid and Pelosi.
All Obama can do is read his teleprompter; all Axelrod can do is holler for more bimbos in the boiler.
At some point Scotty has to complain, "Captain, I canna hold her together much longer. . . ."
Yes, indeed! Two, respectful, knowledgeable gentlemen
Hmmm... I’ve only heard him mention the one.
The debate can be viewed in CSPAN’S Library.
I hpe that’s all it was. The NRAss has released the 2 complaintants from confidentialitu agreements. Publish the info and get it out of the way.
Mr Cain has spoken about it numerous times. That IS what started this whole brouhaha
Okay thanks. I’ll look again.
If anyone has a link or reference I’d appreciate it. I don’t recall him mentioning 2 at his press conference yesterday, and I’ve asked others and so far nobody has come up with anything.
Check this out:
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/16002149/investigator-herman-cain-innocent-of-sexual-advances
They would be if they could get elected.
Cain's "princess Pelosi" remark alone, amid sexual harassment allegations, will help destroy any ticket with him on it. Others, here, insist Newt has too much baggage.
At this rate, we should start preparing ourselves for four more years of "fundamental transformation."
Mr Cain has said 2. The 2nd is murky but may be what Rush spoke of in a fair amount of detail last Thurs., was written up in Redstate and Rightscoop and may be what Wilson or Anderson witnessed.
It`s interesting to see how the supposedly enlightened left seems to get such glee from attacking a black man. You`d think they were only against racism against liberal blacks...
I’m not going to give up that easily.
C’mon. Chin up.
P.S. Princess Pelosi is one of the most hated women in America.
And the first thing that comes to mind when someone says “Princess Pelosi” is that pic of her walking to the Capitol building carrying that huge gavel with that cheese-eating grin on her face, as she knew she was about to go stuff Obamacare down the throat of every American.
Apparently you can not answer my sincere inquiries and do not wish to carry on a civil, informative discussion. Goodnight.
Well: I went back through some early posts and found this from last Saturday. Even this CBS article says that “Cain has insisted he knew of only one complaint...[and]...a severance agreement with one woman”.
I really think that the “2 claims/complaints/settlements/whatever at the NRA” thing has taken on a life its own. I heard someone say “3 claims and settlements” on the radio yesterday!
It appears to be wrong factually, has not been substantiated and unfortunately does not help Cain’s case if people keep repeating it.
*********************************
[snip] “Cain left the association June 30, 1999, according to the NRA. Under that timeline, Cain would have been gone when the settlement was reached—and may well have been gone when she filed the complaint.
Cain has insisted he only knew of one complaint, and says he knew of no legal settlements—only what he calls a severance agreement with one woman. This timeline could well bolster his claims.
When Cain ran to represent Georgia in the Senate four years later, he told his advisers there was one complaint against him at the Restaurant Association, and that it was “baseless.” One former staffer on the Senate campaign told CBS News that he and other advisers in the campaign knew about that complaint and believed it was meritless, but thought it could crop up in possible opposition research.”
Actually, the [and] should probably be removed from the above quote — I added it and it could be construed to be 2 women, which is clearly NOT what the article that I quoted form says.
Apologies!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.