Posted on 11/10/2011 7:11:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Barring a stunning admission or equally stunning retractions, its safe to say that well never know with certainty what happened if anything between Herman Cain and his accusers. Well be able to make educated guesses, but those guesses will be drawn primarily from our subjective judgments of character and veracity but without reference to the kinds of evidence common in sexual-harassment cases.
Corroborating evidence like hotel receipts are likely long-destroyed (very few businesses have record retention policies permitting retention for more than a few years), memories are impaired or embellished by time, and the lack of any contemporaneous legal complaints means that the parties were not subject to the under-oath crucible of depositions and other forms of discovery. In other words, the only real evidence is the accusations themselves (and spare me any argument about the very nominal settlements such tiny amounts mean only that a claim was made, not that it had any credibility).
This is unjust . . . to Herman Cain. He faces old claims from women who obviously felt that the initial incidents (if any) didnt merit a legal filing. In some ways, Herman Cain faces a more difficult challenge than Clarence Thomas. At least Justice Thomas had the opportunity to confront his accuser in a format where Americans were able to weigh their competing stories, saw them competently cross-examined by senators from both sides, and were able to reach a judgment, a judgment that was decisive at the time: Justice Thomas had been wrongly accused. As painful as that experience was, I wonder if it is ultimately less painful than shadow-boxing against accusers whose celebrity attorneys parade them on the morning shows, making allegations that are impossible to disprove yet equally impossible to ignore. Herman Cain is being forced to prove a negative without access to contemporaneous evidence.
There is obviously no statute of limitations on accusations, and it is certainly possible that the claims are true in whole or in part, but the very age of the stories themselves combined with the total absence of tested (or testable) legal claims should shape our judgments. As for me, after more than a week of excruciating public controversy, Im still giving Herman Cain the benefit of the doubt.
The money and support is pouring in for Herman Cain, but we cannot slow down now. Please help him by donating at http://www.hermancain.com/
Also to help join the buzz about Herman go to facebook.com and like him. His likes have jumped dramatically since the attacks started. Make no mistake Sean Hannitys BFF Tokyo Rove is watching Hermans likes and so is Romney. THIS is the way to stick it to the GOP establishment! Please tell your family and friends to like Herman as well. Then lets bring out our most powerful tool for helping Herman Cain: PRAYING that God protects him from the people of darkness.
Your suggestion is a winner
Let's beat Obama with a Cain!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.