Those of us defending Cain against completely unsubstantiated accusations are not the one who “damaged our moral standing”
People like you, who refuse to defend the truth, and routinely lie about Cain, because you think it helps your candidate of choice are the ones who have damaged their moral standing.
Bearing False Witness is still a sin. So I suggest you clean up your own filthy shameless behavior before lecturing anyone about “moral standing”
Wait a minute. Livius’ behavior has been neither “filthy” nor “shameless.” There is nothing filthy or shameless about holding different views from yours. The only people who would demand that, in fact, would be out and out fascists.
I’d also add that Livius has also been nothing short of respectful in expressing these different views. I’ve never once seen this person call names, or demand complete lockstep in the views Livius holds. This is more than I can say of a lot of people, on both sides of the issue. (And that includes me.)