Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator
“The Boy Scouts got a lot of flack for keeping homosexuals out of positions of leadership.

Sandusky was married, so how would that have kept him out of the Boy Scouts?”

####

Good question.

Can we at least agree the Scouts were 100% correct in their stance, understanding that implementation would be difficult when dealing with lying, amoral, perverts who will stop at nothing to feed their sickness?

Not to mention swimming against the heavy tide of nonjudgmental political correctness that is destroying our society at its very foundation. Hell, you can even see it creeping onto this site, normally a bastion of rationality and traditional values.

65 posted on 11/11/2011 7:54:15 AM PST by EyeGuy (2012: When the Levee Breaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: EyeGuy; dfwgator

The Scouts not only don’t accept gay leaders, but they also recognize the danger of covert predators who appear normal in society.

They deal with this by, among other things, strictly enforcing a policy against solo leaders taking boys anywhere. There are always multiple leaders on hand to prevent this type of solitary abuse.


80 posted on 11/11/2011 8:23:38 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson