[sickoflibs]

High stakes case..... this one is definitely going to get some angry.

[Pecos]

Well, here we are. At a minimum, we should get a better idea of just how statist the members of the court are.

[EagleUSA]

Now we find out if we still have a SCOTUS that runs on the law, rather than serving as a political activism center....

[Vaquero]

a scary situation.

especially when you have a floating jurist.

I guess we will have to wait and see and hope that Roberts can positively influence Anthony Kennedy

[vette6387]

According to Judge Napolitano on Fox Business just now, the SCOTUS DID NOT AGREE TO HEAR THE OBAMACARE CASE! But rather it has agreed to hear whether or not those bringing the case “HAVE THE STANDING TO DO SO!”
Personally, I think we need to impeach all of these a$$holes! The country is burning and they continue to fiddle! They are a total disgrace to this nation, every last one of them. They all need to be replaced.

[onyx]

OBAMACARE ON THE DOCKET

OBAMACARE ON THE DOCKET

[ex91B10]

I wonder if "The O's" telling the court not to review the AZ immigration law had anything to do with them agreeing to review the HC law?

[KansasGirl]

Has Kagan recused herself? She must. She cannot an impartial jurist in on a law she help write.

[wiggen]

Does Kagan recuse herself?

[Viking2002]

Here's where your 'Constitutional crisis' could be coming. If the SCOTUS rules against Obamacare, our man-child in chief is just petulant enough to try to skirt the decision and ram it down our throats, anyway. He answers to no one but his puppet-masters.

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."

[WOBBLY BOB]

they’ll find part of it Constitutional and part of it not as to throw a bone to pubbies and rats so both sides can
scurry back to their constituents to claim victory.

[Tublecane]

“an unprecedented expansion of the national government”

Eh, it’s probably been done before, in some form. Our government has done everything you can imagine and then some. If so, it was unconstitutional then, too, is all.

[elpadre]

I would have thought such a high profile and far reaching piece of legislation would have received expedited handling. Is an injunction in order to halt the implementation of the law??

[TonyInOhio]

From Phillip Klein in the DC Examiner:

This is great news for opponents of Obamacare, because the case, which comes out of the 11th Circuit of Appeals, is the best briefed and best argued of all of the various legal challenges to the health care law. It's the case that opponents of the law won at both the district court and appellate level.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

5.5 oral arguments in March...

Still too long to wait this country is in peril.Talk to mortgage companies taking calls from people losing they’re jobs.As well as grocery prices are so high and costs rising...Obama left the upper middle class poor and to survive on they’re own while he vacays in Hawaii.Small businesses shutting down....no one can afford health care...

FUBO!

[BAW]

We have been waiting for this for a long time.

[I am Richard Brandon]

Does anyone have a set of red hot pokers? I have a use for them!

These spoiled job-for-life babies will, according to The Washington Times, START to hear arguments in March 2012 and hand down a decision in June. In the meantime, the mills grind slowly forward, money is spent, decisions are made and lives change while scotus members smoke their cigars, drink their wine and eat their expensive meals, create and read reams of paper and take their leisure. Pass the Pokers Please.

[parksstp]

Hmm, Sounds like Anthony Kennedy wanted people to start kissing his butt again. How nice...The John McCain equivalent on the SCOTUS.

[katiedidit1]

I am on edge....anxious for the ruling but worried