Check out # 166 for FReeper GregNH's commentary, as he attended 0rly's hearing, also. Then read comments through # 181.
Thanks, GregNH, good job.
Posted on 11/16/2011 6:31:19 PM PST by circumbendibus
Thanks, I’ll read it tomorrow.
This is insane. Who is going to stand up? Who is going to fight this coup? There are so few fighters and some idiots right here on FR are on the wrong side.
Check out # 166 for FReeper GregNH's commentary, as he attended 0rly's hearing, also. Then read comments through # 181.
Thanks, GregNH, good job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=BUcyb5pmUKI
WATCH THE VIDEO...WATCH THE VIDEO...WATCH THE VIDEO...
Ok, so you don’t need to be told three times? Make that FOUR.
WATCH THE VIDEO!
The video is almost fifty-eight minutes long, can you give us a thumbnail sketch? Cliffs Notes? Overview? Something? Anything?
NO. You simply have to be patient and watch it. All of it. It’s probably one of the MOST IMPORTANT videos you will ever see. Trust me!
thanks, Greg
Dr. Orly Taitz at 52:09:
“Yes, Mr. Obama gave you a check and a piece of paper for $1,000. Are they going to sell you countries for $1,000?”
The video that Fred Nerks posted is the same as in comment 173. It is of the entire hearing. Basically Orly explaining her 85 page complaint that she submitted to the committee. Then the video in comment 166 is the Assistant AG questioning the Assistant SoS and Orly’s cross examination. This Assistant SoS is the one I have posted the email exchange of in comment 152. That email exchange points out that the Ass. Sos had set a precedent in 08 by disqualifying Mr Mohamed on the grounds that he didn’t meet Article II Sec 1 clause 5 because he admitted he was born in Egypt. But in this case we ignore the fact that Obama is not an NBC.
And when the Committee chair asked Orly if there had been a decision in the “many” law suites filed she said “no” and tried to go further but he cut her off saying “thank you, that is a no” That is was why I got up to testify and clear the record that there was never a decision because not one was heard on the merits for lack of standing.
IIMO that their minds were made up or made up for them before this hearing started. You can see in their lack of attention to testimony, their body language, and of course the decision just looked like they may have even rehearsed it.
There was alot that went on the hall after as well. I got into a shouting match with the jerk from Laconia Mr A. because I was basically telling him that they, the legislators, blew it last year when they failed to pass the ballot reform bill that would have forced dumbo to prove he is an NBC. Another rep told me they have another bill ready and he feels it will pass with a veto proof margin. I of course told him I will be watching. These sums of bitches now know who Greg Goss is for sure, and they know I am one pissed off natural born Citizen.
The comment in 166 is a letter to the editor of the Concord Monitor. I was interviewed by Maddie Hana for about 15 mins and she all she did was mention my name as a “self proclaimed natural born Citizen” the bitch. We will see if that gets published......
As you can tell I can’t sleep....
That’s one of the reasons I was hoping that everyone would take the time to watch the entire video...you can write about it all day long, someone can put up a complete transcript, but unless you see the attitude and the thickheadedness of the people involved, you just don’t get the full picture.
The form was completed correctly, the $ 1,000 was paid, and THAT’S THE PRICE OF YOUR COUNTRY.
It was at that moment Orly almost made me cry. I had a huge lump in my throat, I can tell you...and HEAPS of admiration for that woman!
It was only at the stupidity of what you posted.
I’ve seen this posted before. We all understand that as Minor defined it, the natives (as well as the natural-born citizens) are defined as those who are born in the country to parents who were its citizens. The decision in Luria is a paraphrasing, but not very accurately.
You know about justia.com altering the cases that obtained minor v happersatt?
Very aware of that. Thanx.
One can only wonder what was promised to whom vs. what threats came along as well. The commiecrats will continue and try to head off any light that shows who Bari Schzbazz really is.
Good idea.
I watched the whole video. The simple trick of the chairman calling the Assistant SOS as a witness and not the actual SOS was enough to prevent any questions being asked of the SOS under Oath that could in theory be legally actionable in a appeal.
In the heat of the Moment I don't think Orly spotted the trickery until after her time for questions was up.
The point is that the Assistant SOS is not the person legally responsible, so her evasions are not actionable.
Even if Orly had challenged and requested the Actual SOS as a witness, I think the chairman would have refused it.
The SOS was a Democrat, so this was always going to be a fix of some kind.
Virginia and Florida both have SOS type positions that are freshly appointed by the new state Governor when he/she is elected.
Both these governors are conservatives and may have appointed SOS’s that are serious about the US constitution.
Perhaps Orly should research these two states.
What prompted them to hold the hearing? Are they required by law to do it whenever a state legislator objects to the SOS's placement of a candidate on the primary ballot?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.