Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi's '60 Minutes' Of Fame
Investor's Business Daily ^ | November 4, 2011 | IBD staff

Posted on 11/23/2011 11:25:45 AM PST by raptor22

Hypocrisy: The former speaker of the House, a charter member of the 1% club, is grilled on her investments for a report on congressional conflicts of interest. Can we say "culture of corruption"?

Other than the angel of death, it used to be said, the last thing you wanted on your doorstep or in your office was a reporter from the CBS newsmagazine "60 Minutes."

So when, in an unusual move, Steve Kroft showed up at the Thursday briefings of House Speaker John Boehner and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, tongues began wagging.

Kroft showed up because neither Boehner nor Pelosi agreed to sit-down interviews for a report on congressional conflicts of interest based on a new book by conservative writer and Hoover Institution fellow Peter Schweizer.

His prior works include "Do as I Say (not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy."

While Boehner was asked generic questions, Kroft's questioning of Pelosi, a woman with a reported net worth of $40 million, was more specific.

Why, he asked, had she and her husband participated in "a very large" initial public offering "from Visa at a time when there was major legislation affecting credit-card companies making its way through the House?"

The legislation in question, a bill introduced by then-Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers in March 2008, would have let merchants negotiate lower swipe fees with credit card companies.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; congress; corruption; democrats; ibd; nancypelosi; pelosi

1 posted on 11/23/2011 11:25:47 AM PST by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Hail to Princess Pelosi Galore! Princess Pelosi Galore says, "Plastic Surgery once a month is her secret!"


2 posted on 11/23/2011 11:38:19 AM PST by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

She is repellent inside and out but received a relatively low amount of scrutiny despite being 3rd in line to the presidency at one point.


3 posted on 11/23/2011 11:38:54 AM PST by relictele (Unions: organized crime with better PR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

bump


4 posted on 11/23/2011 11:41:28 AM PST by lowbridge (Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele
Did you mean repulsive not repellent?
5 posted on 11/23/2011 11:43:55 AM PST by golfisnr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: relictele
Did you mean repulsive not repellent?
6 posted on 11/23/2011 11:44:13 AM PST by golfisnr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Nancy, we don’t care what labels you place on legislation you push.

We care about how you behave.

Calling a piece of legislation “bank reform”, doesn’t mean much when you rob banks for a living.

Calling yourself “Catholic” while supporting abortion and belittling Catholics for having a conscience, doesn’t mean you have God’s endorsement.


7 posted on 11/23/2011 11:44:57 AM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The name of the new book is “Throw Them All Out” which I couldn’t find mentioned in the article.

I read it and would suggest everyone read it. It shows why our congress doesn’t accomplish anything. They think their only job is to be reelected so they can continue to rape the country.


8 posted on 11/23/2011 11:47:30 AM PST by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

Crime and cxorruption ping.


9 posted on 11/23/2011 11:55:39 AM PST by raptor22 (Join me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
“Plastic Surgery” is not really a term used anymore as one does not necessarily need to go under the scalpel. Dermal Fills [small injections with hardly a trace of a puncture] are quite common replacing the fat loss one experiences as one ages. Millions of people have a treatment done every few years.
Restylane,is the world's top dermal filler and a legitimate alternative to BOTOX treatments. Restylane re-establishes connective tissues, increases the volume over the next few months to return to the same more youthful shape it once was. Now Sculpturing, is the present day term widely used by doctors all quite common and not invasive as once was the old Plastic surgery.

Not in defense of Pelosi, but the term itself rally gets a nod anymore—advancement in medical science for people who take care of themselves physically, and wish to look as they once did.

Men are opting for it as well. WRKO's Howie Carr Talk Radio Conservative host has had procedures, as has his wife; Sandy his producer as well, and advertises their Doctor on the show regularly.

Times have changed. Medical science changes.

10 posted on 11/23/2011 12:00:24 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Good to see 60 Minutes nail Nancy dirty deeds Pelosi,I didn’t think they had it in them.


11 posted on 11/23/2011 12:01:42 PM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
"participated in "a very large" initial public offering from Visa"

To participate in an already trading public company--

1. Brokers [Investment bank] tend to offer IPO shares to their very best clients often with a generous investment already in, and/or as a sort of incentive or thank you for using that brokerage firm.

2. A smaller individual investor without a huge stock portfolio and a not a lot of money behind you will more often be left out.

3. You must tell your broker far in advance as possible the upcoming IPO shares you are interested in. Almost all IPO shares are priced at the very last minute meaning so you’re not going to know before hand how much you’ll have to pay for them.

4.The larger your trading account, the more likely that they will work with you.

5. Businesses can take advantage of IPOs simply by offering public shares on the market but required is a corporate lawyer, transparent business and financial practices, and of course YOUR Investment Banker.

6. ETF: By investing in an IPO ETF, investors hope to gain exposure to IPOs during when in an initial introduction to the market, diversifying their investment across a pool of IPOs from varying sectors and industries.

7. An investor could make out better after the IPO "rush" and pick the stock up for less money. Those holding an IPO are often expected to hold at least in part, if they want to continue taking part in other offers, the stock for some period of time. It's not that simple to just jump in and cash out.

The "un-knowns" dot-coms in the 90's used to go public, raise a boat load of money even though the co. had never made a profit. CBS-backed iWon.com and gave away $10M to a contestant in April 2000 in a primetime special broadcast on the same. Then 1999-2000, the U.S. Federal Reserve increased interest rates six times, the economy began to lose speed. The dot-com bubble burst, Telecoms suffered [no bailouts heard of] and now interest rates are down again--but "people are still uneasy" not knowing what the future may bring, as they are still trying to crawl out of past bubbles that have burst and the overall global economy. Without investment, venture capitalists, businesses will not grow no matter how big or how small.

It has never been an equal playing field--the richer of society get to play; but they also invest to grow the economy; the looky lookers wish they could be rich and will perhaps someday. Better Off to come up with your own invention, or new business ideal. Then you have the control.

But I do not dispute the fact that government officials/workers/families of should not have playing rules in effect, like anyone else in the public sector. When a company gives out prizes; for instance, the owners, employees and relatives are not allowed to play.

The Media, bloggers have added greatly to misinformation and economic turmoil we have experienced; perhaps many fold over what would have been without them-- all for ratings and for politics or just being plain stupid themselves.

RE: Investment Banks, IPO, ETF, Dot.com

12 posted on 11/23/2011 12:44:08 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
..."being plain stupid themselves" will change to uninformed, or head in the sand,or to quick to report without doing their DD. And have been called stupid on here not long ago. ;)
13 posted on 11/23/2011 12:50:36 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

“His prior works include “Do as I Say (not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.”

Uh no, Peter Schweizer wrote that book along with The Bushes and Reagan’s War.


14 posted on 11/23/2011 1:03:01 PM PST by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
“Plastic Surgery” is not really a term used anymore as one does not necessarily need to go under the scalpel. Dermal Fills [small injections with hardly a trace of a puncture] are quite common replacing the fat loss one experiences as one ages.

Not being from around this part of the Galaxy, could one of you kind Earthlings explain what is this "fat loss one experiences as one ages?"

15 posted on 11/23/2011 1:53:46 PM PST by Erasmus (I love "The Raven," but then what do I know? I'm just a poetaster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

http://www.dermanetwork.org/glossary/2009/5/restoring_fat_loss_in_the_face_via_dermatological_injections.html#b

or here

http://www.rebeccafitzgeraldmd.com/sculptra.html


16 posted on 11/23/2011 2:38:36 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1
repellent [ri-pel-uhnt]   re·pel·lent    [ri-pel-uhnt] Show IPA adjective 1. causing distaste or aversion; repulsive.
17 posted on 11/23/2011 3:19:41 PM PST by relictele (Unions: organized crime with better PR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson