Posted on 11/29/2011 5:51:20 PM PST by Fred
Are you cynical and jaded? NO! You are being realistic. We're talking about liberals, here.
Damn at least you would think they could have brought out a decent looking lady by now.
Compared to his wife these accuser are nothing but skank azz hos.
Well, there ya’ go! Hehehe!
Now that sounds like some fine fiction writing. If Gloria Cain were to actually say that, then I would think twice, but then again, If a frog had wings, he wouldn’t bust his butt everytime he jumped.
My guess is that Gloria Cain is mortally embarrassed and not happy to have been put in this position of a proven fool in front of the whole world.
Look, like many others, started out favoring Palin, then Perry. When Cain caught attention, he caught my eye, because he sounded too good to be true. Now it looks like Cain re-proved the axium, if something sounds too good to eb true, it usually is.
I find interesting two mainstream media outlets have publish some not so flattering stories about Cains accusers. Earlier we had ABC paint an ugle picture of Sharon Bialek and now we got the ComPost on Ginger White.
Don’t try to be a 3rd grade bully, ButtHead. Having been around the block a time or two, I don’t suffer fools lightly.
Looks like all you Cain groupies will have to find another train to hop on. Maybe ronpaul.
Cain brought ALL this stuff on himself. Even his “Billy badass lawyer” couldn’t figure a way to poopoo this one.
I doubt a person with your choice of alias was ever “for” any of the people you listed. Bless your little pea pickin’ heart, though.
Bevis is at FR for an agenda, nothing more. we have several recent sign-ups doing the same verminous posting on any of the politically focused threads. Either Romney workers or obamanoids. I suspect this one is too stupid to be and Romneybot. The thuggish nature of it’s posts smack of axelgreasy hiree.
Thank you. Not many peas to pick this year.
Actually, the handle was more of a reflective jab at many we see here sometimes.
I would not be re-naming myself Nostradamus, if I were you. Your “ESP vision” misses the mark.
Have a great evening my FRiend.
Soros or Axlrod paying you?? you sign up Nov. 2011 just to spread dirt..your not welcome...
Oh I see now.....YOU are one of the 25% that polls say “strongly approve” of the job Obama is doing.
And you are who? Someone in authority? Now I’m so scared.
Yep, you be seein about as well as another recent mind-reader.
Would say that July 20 2011 normally notes a noob too, but I won’t be rude and say something childish.
That comment demonstrates that what he/she/it know about various conservative factions is "nothing," which tells me its trips around the block have been few, and have never been in conservative neighborhoods. But its comment about hopping on trains is pretty amusing given its admission - claim- that it's hopped a lot of trains in this primary season, from one candidate to the next. Note in its listing it carefully left out the one liberals like the most, which is apparently something the trolls are drilled to do in their Alinsky "Divide and Conquer" 101 class.
Herman Cain obviously knew this woman was broke, and vulnerable. In he rides on his white horse, money in hand, to help her out, give her advice, and get laid all at the same time. He said himself that he was helping her financially, so he knew she was on hard times. Dont know why the defenders of Cain use this womans bad financial condition as if it is a strike against her, when it was equally a strike against Cain, as he was the one financing her, for some reason. Guess what that reason might have been?
Newby.
Please.
Of all the women that accused him, 2 wouldn’t even reveal their name, one said she felt ‘uncomfortable’ that Cain was talking about some other women in a way that was maybe-sort of not kind of possibly appropriate, one works at the Obama Treasury dept and won’t give details, and the last two are grifters with history of filing bogus harassment cases, stalking, and seriously checkered backgrounds.
So far NONE of them has any substantiation. It’s pure rumor and shadow games. And YOU fell for it. And I’m supposed to be convinced by some newby, pantywaste, puke-cannon, weak-kneed weasel who is completely sucked in to these cheap political gutter tactics?
Your intellectual illegitimacy is showing, newby.
Proof can be posted at any time.
From a personal attack standpoint your “showed you ass” as they say. Some of Cain supporters would do him a better service to quit the “hot pants groupie” act and remember our previous Conservative Morality.
Not one poster on FR, you nor I, have any facts regarding the original allegations or the facts on this most recent alleged dalliance, its 100% conjecture.
What is evident is his lawyer was very careful with the words in his statements and that is very telling. Lawyers, especially big shot ones, are wordsmiths and do not utter a single word off the cuff. Unless we are also lawyers, we have no real way to know what he “actually” meant on the first 4 or the 13 year affair, reminiscent of “what the meaning of IS is”.
It is 1000% OK for Cain followers to stick with him and if he comes out of all this on top, I will be one of the first to cheer for him, but what I know of human nature and of similar “opportunity” situations with the ladies, I do think there is more than anyone who actually knows the facts is admitting.
Closing your eyes and whistling past the graveyard is really not good for you or for Cain.
In the current GOP primary situation, I have now focused more on Newt, even with his warts, but I am still not closed minded about Mr. Cain.
So, bearing false witness is now your schtick. Fits your past posting spittle quite well. Sadly, you will have one or two here who will gladly join in the bearing false witness. You serve your father, as you slither along in his shadow ... the father of lies, of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.