Posted on 11/30/2011 5:43:25 AM PST by IbJensen
Our Dictator May Be In Deep Trouble...with Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.
The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court , even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on... And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii, double citizenship, natural born...and others.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And also the ATF and DOJ and the gun sales under Fast and Furious.
Up until this point I was sold.
You're exactly right. This one sentence puts into serious, serious doubt the credibility of the entire article. In fact, I would go farther, and say the entire article is hogwash, based on the incredible stupidity of this one sentence.
agreed. Something about its source being just “email” bothers me.
and then this...
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii, double citizenship, natural born...and others.
...that would be great if true, but its been so long since someone made that claim and nothing to show from it yet.
And this....
when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment
...THAT was January 2010, so this email was written in the 2nd half in 2010. It is at least a year old
It looks like the SCOTUS has no urgency to smack down Obama on anything. Sorry. This looks like a very old email swirling around the internet.
Moderator - does a one year old email count as FRONT PAGE news?
I believe that's the Rule; but with the continuum of RINO's and Socialists, no one EVER prosecutes Traiterous acts of their predecesor, nor do they usually dismiss those appointed by them. It's not something that happens often, unless it's a Democrat/Progressive/Socialist, such as selective Law Enforcement (DOMA and Illegal Deportations come to mind).
I understand that while and after reading, then reflecting on the contents of this email of Mr. Hennessy that the happenings reflected upon have happened and are true.
Editorializing on whether or not Justice Roberts intends to act on these ethical and criminal acts by this administration is license that many, if not all, editorials have in common.
There is nothing 'naked' about email postings unless they are in the eye of a few beholders. I have indicated links to follow for part of these, but to refer to them all would be meaningless, especially to readers like yourself.
This administration is, and should be, in great legal difficulty that if action would indeed be taken would put these miscreants in prison. Whether or not this occurs does indeed remain to be seen.
“......against all enemies foreign and domestic...”
The “domestic” part is here, now, and spitting in our faces on a daily basis.
Also, it's apparent the writer knows little about constitutional law or how a case about the activities of the New Black Panther voter intimidation might reach the court...or numerous other issues mentioned.
Silly email.
Well then that begs the question of why Roberts would allow himself to be "made" by 0dumb0 to redo the swearing in. If this is the case, then Roberts should have told 0dumb0 to go ___k himself.
As I recall from the swearing in, Roberts said his phrase and then 0dumb0 jumped in prematurely and screwed up his piece. I wish that Roberts would have looked 0dumb0 squarely in the face and said "Ok, let's do this one more time.... I will say a phrase and then you repeat only that phrase after me, then I say another phrase & you repeat only that phrase after me, and so on. Do you understand?"
That is what I wish Roberts had done...... not allow himself to redo the oath based on 0dumb0's whims. Why is it that it seems just about EVERYBODY (Repubs & so-called conservatives included), cater & grovel at every whim of the RAT bastard socialist commie pig 0dumb0. Geez, I wish that someone, anyone, would have the balls & fortitude to fire back at 0dumb0 and keep firing back at him harder & harder.
Pray for the health and well-being of the slim majority of the court that has respect for the US Constitition and the traditional American way of life.
There! Fixed that!
There! Fixed that!
see reply 62...what is your response, dammit?
We can only hope and pray.
Are there any fearless patriots in government left?
His name is Steve Dunham.
What sources?
Me too, and include CJ Roberts in my prayers every night.
Just damn!
You lost me...have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.