I have seen your [Cincinatus' Wife] countless posts about Perry which amount to nothing but fanatical support of an atrociously poor candidate for President of The Untied States of America.I used to be a Perry supporter and a Cincinatus' Wife defender.While I, have posted just last evening that with Newt Conservatives need to keep a constant pressure on him.
This “unpredictability” opinion needs to be backed up by you because the item you posted here fails to do so. The Lib spotlights the dated statement from Gingrich about illegals and takes half the item to briefly allude in a single sentence what Gingrich has said out it since then.
The only thing predictable here is you turning to the next front-runner because your guy sucks real bad as a candidate.
I am now no longer either.
Perry has shown an inability to communicate which makes him completely unelectable and Cincinatus' Wife has slipped, in my opinion, from a valiant fighter for a cause to a tired old repetitive hack.
Perry's support in many polls is now below the margin of error of those polls. I know the same was true for Gingrich back in the spring of this year, but that was the beginning of the campaign and that was before Perry's huge bump in the polls upon his initial entry into the campaign.
It's one thing to be a 1%er in April... quite another to be a 1% in December, after you've been has high as 30%.
Anyone who can't see the reasons and the significance and the meaning and the likely outcome of Perry's fall from 30% to 1% is either a paid operative or just plain stupid.
I might be wrong. If so then Cincinatus’ Wife will please correct me.
But if I recall correctly... Cincinatus’ Wife was just as big a Romney 2008 supporter as she now is a Perry 2012 supporter.
And with Perry doing so badly now - one has to wonder what the real motive of trying to deflate Newt is about?
Especially at this late point with votes being cast next month - Romney is the only who will gain, definitely not Perry.
This is why it is important for people to remain on guard and not be misled by a possible hidden agenda.
As I recall samtheman, you were a Sarah Palin supporter (as I had been for years -- posting my threads and vanities in support and defense of her). Then I realized Sarah Palin was not running but Rick Perry was (Apparently, you also saw his ideology was in line with hers, as you began posting Palin-Perry composite photos to my Rick Perry threads).
Now you've moved your support to Newt Gingrich (I don't know if that was a straight line or if Herman Cain was before Newt).
Newt (quoted above in post #1] liked Sarah's following in Iowa but said she could only succeed if "..[she] ..“seeks out a group of sophisticated policy advisers” and “spends time developing a series of fairly sophisticated positions.”
Yet you made it a point to post that I am a "tired old repetitive hack" in your defensive of Newt Gingrich, someone who finds Sarah Palin lacking in those "sophisticated" complex thoughts and government policies he is so famous for attributing to himself.
Don't worry samtheman, no one will now associate you with me or my support of Gov. Perry -- but rather with Gingrich who only wants your vote, and who in fact finds you and the rest us middle Americans, intellectually beneath his contempt.