Skip to comments.Study Says Gingrich Amnesty Bigger Than '86 Blanket Amnesty -- Gingrich Seems to Reject
Posted on 12/02/2011 11:49:17 AM PST by hellbender
Study Says Gingrich Amnesty Bigger Than '86 Blanket Amnesty -- Gingrich Seems to Reject 'Attrition Through Enforcement'
“Pubbie Party fools” respond to big donor money, from agricultural interests to construction firms who exploit the cheap labor market.
The Left knows capitalism’s weakest spot - greed! - and takes advantage of it.
The whole key to making our immigration laws work is enforcement and severe violation for those who violate it.
There is no more existential threat to the United States of American than the illegal invasion. Enabling it is a key part of what Mark Levin calls the Progressive’s “Counter Revolution”. Why doesn’t “big thinker” Newt get that?
Apparently, the Cainsterical have just discovered numbers USA and the other candidate/issues sites. It appears they are going to make threads out of anything in the rather extensive record that they think they can get outrage from.
LOL Same bunch every thread. Hilarious!
I agree. Tax rates, health care law, judges and spending can be changed in the future. Legalization of illegals is permanent.
Newt and Perry are the open amnesty frieks.
Beating Barack Obama trumps all other issues. period.
Gingrich is not calling for amnesty, he is seeking millions of illegals to leave, he has pledged to complete the border fence, and to send 7500 homeland security agents to the border.
Michelle bachman is not going to be the nominee, however when she is the front runner I will support her as well.
Are you thus denying that immigration (and the terrible position Newt and Romney have on that issue) is legitimate?
Or are you like every other establishment RINO-supporting “Republican” in dodging the real issues?
We are facing a replay of 2008, when the only real conservative, Duncan Hunter, was dismissed and shunted to the outer limits of the TV cameras, while soporific dopes like Thompson were viewed as the hope of the movement. Bachmann and Cain are the only candidates who have taken a stand against the Third World conquest of America. The other candidates have a position basically like that of the Demonrat Party. The Left knows full well why it wants Third World immigration: to support permanent socialist takeover of America. Too bad the fools in the Pubbie Party have no clue. They only want to win another election, before sinking into complete irrelevance.
LOL.... With many of these Newt bashing posts, I consider the source and obvious intent.... then I go find something intelligent to read. LOL
I know all about illegal immigration and the republican nominee will get my vote. Sorry but if you think Duncan Hunter was the only choice in 2008 I can’t go there with you.
Newt and Romney?
As has been pointed out a million times here, Newt’s plan = Bachmann’s plan = Cain’s plan.
There is no intellectually honest way to deduce otherwise.
Debate Flashback: When Bachmann Supported A Non-Deportation Approach to Illegal Immigration
Cain Wants Illegal Immigration Issue Shifted to States
Callistic Gingrich was staffer and eventually Chief Clerk of the House Committee on Agriculture. She worked there around 18 years, IIRC, until at least 2006.
I didn’t know that about Callista. Thanks for the info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.