Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/04/2011 2:29:57 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Clint N. Suhks

‘Wesley J. Smith, who authors a blog about bioethics on the website of First Things, posted an entry on Saturday that was sharply critical of Gingrich’s statements to Tapper.

Smith pointed to an embryology textbook he had quoted in his own book, Consumer’s Guid to a Brave New World.

“If we want to learn the unvarnished scientific truth about whether an early embryo—wherever situated—is really a form of human life, we need only turn to apolitical medical and embryology textbooks,” Smith wrote.

“For example,” wrote Smith, “the authors of The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology (6th Ed.) assert: ‘Human development is a continuous process that begins when an oocyte is fertilized by a sperm...’ The fertilized egg is known as a zygote, which ‘is the beginning of a new human being ...’ More to the point, the authors write: ‘Human development begins at fertilization’ with the joining of the egg and sperm, which ‘form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized ... cell marks the beginning of each of us a unique individual.’”

WESLEY J. SMITH combines science with morality, and is one of the most trusted pro-life intellectuals out there!


97 posted on 12/04/2011 6:07:26 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The eye of Newt will implode, and the “angry old badger will appear for winter.


105 posted on 12/04/2011 6:15:59 PM PST by Lady on the Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
With Cain out, we are left with only 2 candidates who are to the right of GW Bush. Likewise, in 2008 we went in to the primaries with only 2 candidates to Bush's right. (Actually, now that I think about it I'm not even sure Fred was right of Bush). Anyway, my point is that no one to Bush's right can get any traction whatsoever.

Is this because our country is finished or is it because the msm has sharpened its game so well that it can easily destroy true Conservatives?

120 posted on 12/04/2011 6:42:24 PM PST by rhinohunter (Not voting for RINO Romney...no way...no how)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Gingrich had no business converting to Catholicism if he had no intention of following Church teachings. The guy is Clinton redux.


121 posted on 12/04/2011 6:43:41 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

“”Newt Gingrich said he believes that human life does not begin at conception but at “implantation and successful implantation””

I don’t even know know HOW or WHY he made this jump!!! This is really too far out there for me. Do we have to say goodbye to Newt now too? Sure is beginning to look like it.


126 posted on 12/04/2011 6:47:12 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

This video on the development of a baby shows that at 25 days the heart is formed and thereafter starts beating. It seems to me that if the beating heart is stopped deliberately, that is killing.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/11/astounding_video_shows_fetal_development_in_detail.html


129 posted on 12/04/2011 6:52:57 PM PST by Islander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

He can ask his “very difficult questions” of Lucifer who’s surely waiting for him.


146 posted on 12/04/2011 7:35:53 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Don’t tell me we’re coming down to Romney. I think Gingrich has jumped the shark. He’s so busy trying to get the “correct” answer that he has no clue about the RIGHT answer.


158 posted on 12/04/2011 8:51:51 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Right to Life -

Asked in an interview on the CBS News program “Face the Nation,” whether he agreed with Republicans who oppose Federal abortion payments in cases of rape or incest or to protect the life of a mother, Mr. Gingrich said: “No. First of all, I think you should have funding in the case of rape or incest or life of the mother, which is the first step.”

http://rightonlife.org/2011/11/24/pro-life-groups-should-say-no-to-newt-and-pooh-pooh-perry-2/

Self Defense -

“In 1996, Newt Gingrich turned his back on guns and voted for the anti-gun Brady Campaign’s Lautenberg Gun Ban, which strips the Second Amendment rights of citizens involved in misdemeanor domestic violence charges or temporary protection orders –- in some cases for actions as minor as spanking a child or grabbing a spouse’s wrist.(1)”

http://www.nationalgunrights.org/the-inconvenient-truth-about-newt/

Newt does not support the right to life or the means to protect it and is nothing more than a flip-flopping RINO, just like Mitt Romney.


164 posted on 12/04/2011 11:03:24 PM PST by RasterMaster ("To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Here’s another poll on the GOP race that just got started, so the numbers are very skewed right now. Everyone can forward it around to anyone planning on voting in the Republican GOP primary or caucus, in an attempt to get a larger and more representative voting base:

http://micropoll.com/t/LEzBOZFlnc


165 posted on 12/04/2011 11:13:56 PM PST by BagCamAddict (If we let them run Cain out of town, they will do it to EVERY GOP candidate from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

When ever life begins is a fundamental question of the State Goverment. For without an answer there can be no law.


166 posted on 12/04/2011 11:17:31 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
In an interview with ABC News on Friday, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said he believes that human life does not begin at conception but at "implantation and successful implantation" because if you say life begins at conception "you're going to open up an extraordinary range of very difficult questions."

At conception, a human embryo consists of a single cell.

At implantation, about 9 days later, it consists of around 100 cells.

The embryo (blastocyst) is growing, dividing, developing, and starting to differentiate. That is the very definition of life. And, of course, it is human life: because it is the product of human conception, it can't be otherwise.

The only "very difficult question" this raises is why Gingrich couldn't have picked up a basic medical textbook and learned this himself, before spouting his ignorance on the subject in public.

173 posted on 12/05/2011 5:28:01 AM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Rep. Bachmann put out a statement on Friday, expressing disagreement with what Gingrich had told ABC News.

When is MB EVER going to put out a statement disagreeing with Mitt? The twelfth of never.
181 posted on 12/05/2011 6:45:59 AM PST by presently no screen name (If it's not in God's Word, don't pass it off as truth! That's satan's job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson