Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Save the World on Your Own Dime
Townhall.com ^ | December 5, 2011 | Mike Adams

Posted on 12/04/2011 9:56:37 PM PST by Kaslin

The taxpayers are being beaten to death by liberalism. Meanwhile academic liberals are complaining that they are taking a beating with recent budget cuts, which they claim are unjust. For the first time in a long time, I agree with the liberals. The budget cuts are unjust. In my view, they aren’t deep enough. If you disagree, consider this: One public university in North Carolina has just found money to start (in the midst of a budget crisis) a new scholarship to reward feminists for engaging in feminist political activism on the job.

Here in the Tar Heel state, this year’s budget cut in higher education is nearly 16%. But there was still enough money in the pot to create a new Janet Mason Ellerby Women and Gender Studies Scholarly Award. The award was created to recognize Ellerby’s “significant contributions to feminist scholarship and activism.”

What are those contributions? Let’s start with activism.

Some years ago, Janet Ellerby learned that the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders were slated to make an appearance at UNC-Wilmington. Ellerby joined an effort to keep the Cowgirls from coming to our campus. Why? Well, you know the reason. They wear too little clothing and help promote unhealthy (read: sexist) images of what a woman should look like. The Cowgirls were young, thin, and happy. UNCW feminists, on the other hand, place a premium on being old, plump, and angry. The Cowgirls had to go!

Of course, anyone who has ever been to UNCW recognizes the futility of banning scantily-clad women from campus. Our co-eds generally make the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders look like nuns. That’s why UNCW is sometimes referred to as UNC-Whorehouse. Personally, I’m offended by those who refer to our young women as “whores.” That’s why I was disappointed when UNCW hired a rapper to come to campus to call women “bitches” and “whores” back in 2003. (Note: He made $130,000 in the process!). But the rapper, unlike the cheerleaders, was not banned from UNCW by the feminists. Some UNCW feminists consider promiscuity to be empowering. So I suppose “whore” is just a term of endearment.

Speaking of whores, another example of Janet Ellerby’s activism would be the fight for free health care for prostitutes. While under the direction of Janet Mason Ellerby, the WRC placed a large display in the lobby of the UNCW library. The display made an argument for free health care for prostitutes with no moral condemnation of prostitution whatsoever. In fact, the display declined to refer to the women as prostitutes. It called them “sex workers.” If you haven’t seen the connection between these first two examples of feminist activism, I’ll just spell it out below (in bold letters):

FEMINISTS DO NOT WANT MEN LOOKING AT CHEERLEADERS. THEY WANT THEM TO HAVE HEALTHIER SEX WITH PROSTITUTES!

None of this should come as a surprise to my readers. Janet Mason Ellerby was the “activist” who placed pictures of naked children in the lobby of the UNCW library as a part of Women’s History Month. Oops! That’s Womyn’s Herstory Month. She did so in connection with her official capacities as director of the Women’s Center. The provost tried to move the naked pictures to another location because pedophiles had previously been caught downloading child pornography right there in the UNCW library. Ellerby had a conniption. And she enlisted the help of the Faculty Senate in the name of academic freedom.

As a result of Janet Mason Ellerby’s activism, faculty members now face no time, place, and manner restrictions on their desire to display pictures of nude post-pubescent minors on public property. But UNCW still refrains from using the term “Christmas Tree” lest they offend the irreligious. Now it’s a holiday tree, wait, no! That’s too holy, now it’s just a tree! And the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders are still banned from the UNCW campus. Man, these bitches and hos are relentless!

Have you have ever wondered why I refer to “feminist scholarship” as an oxymoron on a par with “jumbo shrimp?” Just read Intimate Reading, the personal memoir of Janet Mason Ellerby. It will help you better understand her desire to post pictures of naked children in public libraries. In a soft pornographic romance novel sort of way, Ellerby gives a graphic account of losing her virginity at age 16. She talks in great detail about the experience – including her effort to clean the blood off the couch where she had that first sexual experience. From there, she proceeds to write about blood running from her vagina in the shower afterwards. And, regrettably, the graphic account is required reading for many students in Women’s Studies classes.

The Ellerby sex scene might not be true scholarship. But it does have some symbolic value. Whenever feminist scholarship is taken seriously, we all lose a measure of our innocence. And someone is stuck cleaning up a big mess in the aftermath.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: culturewar; liberalbias; mediaandculture; uncw

1 posted on 12/04/2011 9:56:45 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Apple Pan Dowdy; bayouranger; bboop; BenKenobi; Biggirl; Blue Collar Christian; boomop1; ...

Mike Adams Column


Please Freepmail me if you want to be added, or removed from the ping list

2 posted on 12/04/2011 9:57:59 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Want to end the entitlement society and tame big Government?

End the Federal Reserve. It is the cornerstone of Progressive Government.


3 posted on 12/04/2011 10:01:27 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes! As most of the dung that comes out of the closet today, should stay in the closet [water closet, that is] and be flushed down with the rest of the dung!


4 posted on 12/04/2011 10:12:45 PM PST by LetMarch (If a man knows the right way to live, and does not live it, there is no greater coward. (Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
rulz:


Ve haf Vays of Makink You Obey!
5 posted on 12/05/2011 12:18:49 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When it’s not your money, what does one care where it goes?


6 posted on 12/05/2011 3:37:03 AM PST by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWB Patriot

Only if someone has a conscion (sp)


7 posted on 12/05/2011 3:42:52 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

The rules apply only about gorgeous women, not Marxist women


8 posted on 12/05/2011 3:45:38 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

Counter-Post!!!

9 posted on 12/05/2011 4:25:51 AM PST by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; catman67

Catman67 has provided the much needed antidote!


10 posted on 12/05/2011 4:42:21 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We should be able to "vote" for what we want to spend. There should be a box or two on the tax form that says how much "over" what is required you'd like to spend for green jobs, welfare, etc. If people check the box, adding money to their tax bill, then the money is there. If they don't check it and it is not funded, then it doesn't happen. The libs "talk" a great game, but want US to check the box while they wouldn't think of doing it themselves.

Same thing for the public unions ... if you want them to have a pay/benefits increase, you check your box and add the number to your tax bill. If you don't check the box and increase your tax bill, then the unions don't get an increase. Better YOU and ME controlling this than people who give them raises to get votes.

Imagine a box that says, add $1000 to my tax bill for "green jobs" or another button for "increase teachers' union benefits" add $1000 to my tax bill.

And if you don't pay any taxes, then you don't get to check a box do you?

11 posted on 12/05/2011 5:07:23 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson