Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred

Have heard most of those expailned by Newt in speeches or interviews recently and he has OK explainations that don’t seem quite the same as you pushed. I will keep listening to credible sources and what the man says that sound plausible.

For instance,
Newt explained that TR was conservative until he went 3rd party then saw the progressives as his hope for 2nd term. More or less jives with my impressions.

HC - he explained that Heritage first propmoted this and he agreed then until looking deeper when he and most other conservatives saw the potential for dem abuse (like we saw in nobamacare).

His position on ethanol is that as long as oil gets tax break/subsidies, why should ethanol be treated differently and that all energy tax breaks/subsidies should be gone.

There never will be a single perfect conservative candidate, so long as some keep nit picking with such minute and potentially mis-leading details, we will keep getting liberal dems elected. Right now, Newt “probably” is our best conservative, even with his warts, that can beat nobama and deliver our best chance of erasing years of dem damage.

Enough of the sliming.... ENOUGH.


211 posted on 12/08/2011 12:58:11 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: X-spurt

Oh, no, TR was no conservative; he even abhorred the term. But he was most patriotic unlike so many of the anti-conservatives. TR believed government was a part of the solution of most national problems; his nephew-by-marriage went even further.


255 posted on 12/10/2011 7:38:33 AM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the March 6 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson