Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich opens up big leads in South Carolina and Florida [NBC/Marist poll - TEA PARTY POWER]
MSNBC ^ | Dec 11, 2012 | By NBC's Mark Murray

Posted on 12/11/2011 12:02:07 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-213 next last
To: Hoodat

You are no longer worth the effort to reason with...have a nice night.


161 posted on 12/11/2011 6:33:05 PM PST by ez ("Abashed the Devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, "Paradise Lost")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

>> I’m guessing that most people who read this thread can identify who the idiot might be. >>

I think I have it nailed. And FTR, no one called Beck an idiot. Did someone question his reasoning? Yep. His motives? That too. His very selective interest in history? Absolutely.

But no one said idiot.


162 posted on 12/11/2011 6:34:42 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: All

I think we would all do well to remember two maxims here:

First, the old saying goes that “Perfect is the enemy of good”. Newt is clearly not perfect...but I think he is the definition this year of the Bill Buckley standard; namely, the most conservative candidate that can win. He can win because he would make Obama look like a fool in a debate. Bachmann, Santorum may have better conservative creditials, but they cant win. MB isn’t ready for prime time and Santorum just really isn’t either. I probably agree with them slightly more than Newt, but Newt can win and thats the difference.

Second, Chuck Noll, coach of the Steelers used to say with regards to the prospect of acquiring new players in mid season “help is NOT on the way”. I like Sarah Palin and Haley Barbour (sp?), I really do. But they chose not to run, so we can’t be caught endlessly daydreaming in the land of “what if”. We must focus on “what is”, and what is, right now in the presidential primary, is Newt Vs. Romney. Given that choice, right now, the pick seems obvious.

Its really a reverse of Brutus’ speech to the Romans: Not that I loved Newt so much more, but that I love Romney less...and Obama least of all.


163 posted on 12/11/2011 6:40:07 PM PST by SoCalTransplant (Can we make Trump the mod on all debates so Paul and Huntsman wont come?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
Reason? From you? Now that's funny. Enlighten me then. Which parts of Obamacare do you find acceptable? I don't find any of it acceptable. Zero. Nada. Yet somehow, you believe my position to be unreasonable? lol
164 posted on 12/11/2011 6:47:29 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
I AM NOW ENDLESSLY SELF-PROMOTING OUR ANTI-MITT GROUP IN WESTERN NEW HAMPSHIRE.


165 posted on 12/11/2011 6:54:25 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

which candidate is it exactly that you are supporting?


166 posted on 12/11/2011 6:56:47 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Of those in the race, Rick Santorum most closely shares my views. So he gets my support.


167 posted on 12/11/2011 7:01:40 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

This is GREAT!

I would love to see the $$$$$ and time spent by Romney to all go for naught. I’m convinced that the Dems are really scurrying now ...in case they have to change gears. They were planning (I think) a BIG anti-rich, anti-Wall Street thus...anti-Romney campaign. They were going to link Romney with wealth and Wall Street. It may be that the Occupy Groups were part of that. Romney didn’t help matters with his $10,000 bet last night either. Lol...


168 posted on 12/11/2011 7:12:36 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: SoCalTransplant

William Buckley was a brilliant man. He is definitely missed.


169 posted on 12/11/2011 7:15:46 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

As for me, of those in the race, Newt Gingrich is the candidate most likely to actually accomplish things consistent with my views - so I am supporting him (after writing him off several times “for good”) :)


170 posted on 12/11/2011 7:23:51 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

I had the exact same reaction, Sum. Was a Cain fan, but since his departure I was looking for someone else. My default was either Santorum or Perry (Santorum for his consistent Conservatism and Perry for his good stewardship of Texas), but Newt has shown the greatest talent for explaining conservative principles in a way that leaves the libs speechless!


171 posted on 12/11/2011 7:25:01 PM PST by TheWriterTX (Hunkering down...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Well, Rick Santorum. Fine candidate. But for most of us we cannot go to Iowa. I’m doing NH and Rick has no campaign there. Not a real campaign.

New Hampshire voters lose interest very fast when it comes to single digit candidates. The reality in NH is Mitt vs. Newt with RPaul tagging along.

I am sure RS has a phoning program into Iowa. I hope he or MB beat out MITT for 2nd place. Or whatever.


172 posted on 12/11/2011 7:42:53 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
It won't matter if Mitt wins New Hampshire. He won't win California. He won't win New York. He won't win Pennsylvania. He won't win Ohio. And he won't win a single Southern state. Mitt Romney has zero chance of winning the GOP nomination. The sooner everyone realizes that, the sooner we can stop flirting with RINOs such as McNewt.

As someone who is involved in NH, do you think Santorum can get any traction at all if he finishes 2nd in Iowa?

173 posted on 12/11/2011 8:07:26 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

I can tell you for a fact that the Tea Party is not backing Newt.

Stay tuned this week for breaking news on that item.


174 posted on 12/11/2011 8:14:44 PM PST by Captain7seas (FIRE JANE LUBCHENCO FROM NOAA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

I cannot see any boomlet for RS in NH following 2nd place in IA. NH voters are very savvy and want to throw their support to one of the top competitors to effect the first-place outcome. I put the RS ceiling at 7%.

People still see MITT as a threat and are motivated by it. If MITT drops out (after FLA?), the dynamics will change and it will be Newt vs. somebody.

SO I agree with some of your thoughts. For me, it is just that there are only 4 campaigns in NH: mitt, newt, rpaul, huntsman.


175 posted on 12/11/2011 8:21:16 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: APatientMan

Remember, Palin may endorse before Iowa. Cain will also endorse. ‘The Donald’ will endorse after 12/27. My prediction is that all 3 will endorse Newt.

The surge will push him to first/close second in Iowa; a split in New Hampshire and blowouts thereafter.

Romney’s only firewall is NH. If he doesn’t win Iowa, he’s toast because SC, FL, TN, etc. will deliver the South for Newt. There’s no stopping him after SC.


176 posted on 12/11/2011 8:22:36 PM PST by BlackjackPershing ("The Business of America is Business"--President Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
For me, it is just that there are only 4 campaigns in NH: mitt, newt, rpaul, huntsman.

If forced to choose between those four, I would take Huntsman. It's difficult to stomach his ties to the Obama State Department, but his tenure as Utah Governor was fairly solid.

177 posted on 12/11/2011 8:33:06 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

its funny so many were quick to jump on rasmussen having newt up two over obama but now obama up 5 and no one says a word..lol


178 posted on 12/11/2011 9:02:51 PM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Obama is the one talking about de-funding Social Security
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you say so. I don’t see it that way. Obama wants to fund SS with income taxes rather than payroll taxes.

This is all getting just a little ridiculous. I’m not sure I give a shit anymore. There’s worthless trash in both parties and nothing to be happy about.

no journalist anywhere in the media will ask a question that cannot be answered with a talking point. none of them will call out a candidate that fails to answer the question, or changes the subject to get to his talking points. And we know that they will not redirect to get information that was circumvented to get to the talking point. WE also know they are liars who say one thing while doing another.

So to all you Freepers who claim to be tea partyers while getting excited about voting for one of these frauds(especially you folks that are cheerleading for mitt or newt), I give you all a big fat rasberry. You’ve earned it.


179 posted on 12/11/2011 9:29:26 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

I consider myself part of the tea party and I cannot say at this point that I’m not backing Newt. Whom do you mean when you refer to the Tea Party? Far as I’m concerned we’re a bunch of independent people with the same general idea but we’re leaderless. Would really like to hear your thoughts on this.


180 posted on 12/11/2011 10:00:46 PM PST by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson