Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/12/2011 8:40:49 AM PST by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: expat1000
But the biometrics camera they were using takes ten minutes to scan so the private was ordered to cut off the fighters' index fingers in the hope of being able to identify them later.

Absolutely the right command decision while under the fire. And the dead Taliban won't be missing them anyway.

2 posted on 12/12/2011 8:43:28 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expat1000

I have no problem with this.

It’s not like they were saving them as souvenirs.

IMO whoever is demanding their trial is an assahole.


3 posted on 12/12/2011 8:50:28 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expat1000

And this is a bad thing because...?


5 posted on 12/12/2011 9:00:46 AM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expat1000

They came up with an effective and sensible solution...


6 posted on 12/12/2011 9:01:38 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expat1000
The title makes it sound like they were taking trophies.

The facts are they were doing due diligence.

Case dismissed, prosecutor censured, should be the final result in a perfect world.

/johnny

8 posted on 12/12/2011 9:04:43 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expat1000
They also going to execute persecute prosecute coroners doing autopsies for 'mutilation of a corpse' or whatever they call it over there?
10 posted on 12/12/2011 10:00:53 AM PST by ApplegateRanch ("Public service" does NOT mean servicing the people, like a bull among heifers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expat1000
How can it be a “war crime” to mutilate the corpse of an illegal combatant? The British should wait for some country to claim the illegal (disguised as civilians) combatants, then charge that country with war crimes. If the combatants had been wearing uniforms and dog tags, identification would have been simpler and would not have required “mutilation”.
12 posted on 12/12/2011 10:30:57 AM PST by Ragnar54 (America's enemy: Obama replaced Osama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expat1000
The troops include a 25-year-old lieutenant who is the youngest officer ever to be awarded the Military Cross

Not relevant to the article, but I hate seeing ridiculous mistakes like this made in the media.

Many many Military Crosses have been awarded to officers under 25. The Decoration was specifically created during the First World War as a medal for junior officers (since 1993 non-officers can also receive it after the British ended the practice of awarding different medals to officers and other ranks).

For a start, Sir Charles Kingsford-Smith MC AFC earned his as a twenty year old Lieutenant of the Royal Flying Corps in 1917. He's just one example I can name instantly - he certainly wasn't the youngest either. I can't name any but there were many British officers as young as 18 during the First World War, and I would be stunned if none of them earned an MC.

13 posted on 12/12/2011 4:25:58 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson