Skip to comments.Five Myths About Ron Paul
Posted on 12/13/2011 10:58:28 AM PST by BatMite
click here to read article
Welcome to FR.
Since Dec 13, 2011
Ron Paul -says it’s okay for homosexuals to serve openly in the military, that it’s okay for Iran to have nukes, and the 9/11 was our fault.
And for your filing: Batmite had already bought the zot before I even posted.
So you can unbunch your undies.
Gingrich, Romney, Bachman, Paul and Huntsman.
Given those choices, I would always vote for anybody but obummer, I would then say that extends to anybody but Paul then anybody but Huntsman.
You’re a troll named after the Batman equivalent of Scrappy-Doo pushing a truther nut for POTUS on a site where the owner has said all of the truther candidate’s “spam monkey” supporters can kiss his ass.
Woohoo, let’s get a Truther in the White House! Yeeeeeeah Boy!!!!
Wooooooo! Truther in the White House! Woooooo!
Yeah, that’s the only sane option. Sure it is. Lie down and wait for the paramedics.
Gotta love the paultards as they continue in their ‘epirc strurggle’ to enthrone a gurgling moron.
They amusing after a fashion, but also pathetic and pitiable.
He also has the moronic idea that a group of people who bathe stockbrokers and secretaries in flaming jet fuel for their tin god would have been placated by a few foreign policy changes.
When even the UN thought this guy had enough nerve agent to kill every person on Earth, one doesn’t need to look for a shadowy “real reason” for the invasion. That’s just sloppy reasoning.
So you agree that “bringing democracy” was not the real reason?
How many times did Saddam have to violate the surrender agreement before the ‘or else’ part of the surrender agreement would happen?
Do you remember what the ‘or else’ part of the surrender agreement was?
It was an immediate return to a state of war, destruction of his military, etc etc etc.
And yes, before you whine it out, a surrender agreement is under duress- that’s why it is ‘surrender’.
And we did find chemical weapons, three mustard gas shells werew turned into IED’s as well as one binary Sarin shell of a type that Iraq did not have prior to 1996 or so.
The info can be found in the Deulfer report IF you’d bother to read it.
Why should anyone whine if US interests are not the primary consideration?
Ask the banned anti-military troll poster “JohnGalt” and his echo Burkeman1.
I putting words in my mouth is the only way you can keep up, you may want to re-evaluate your position.
Here’s the text. Be sure and tell me where the stuff about the crusade for democracy is:
Oh, and be sure to tell me where any administration official or flag officer who commanded troops in that war has said we invaded the place in order to put democracy there and for no other reason. Be sure you can cite your source.
It hardly matters whether he really had the weapons...we thought he did, and legitimately so. If he had passed sarin or VX to Al Qaida and it had been deployed in the NYC subway system, the Wrong Paul crowd would be telling us Bush held off from invading Iraq to benefit his oil buddies.
I knew I wasn’t the only one to notice that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.