Posted on 12/14/2011 11:44:10 PM PST by trumandogz
MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) A University of Vermont fraternity has been suspended while school officials, national organization leaders and police investigate allegations that a survey was circulated among members asking them who they would like to rape.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
I can't imagine what kind of organization would promote the rape of women.
CAIR?
Yeah, Jennifer Aniston better watch out. This could be a movie: Attack of the Perverted Vermont Frat Boys.
I agree, very sick bastards! They need to expel the instigators of this survey.
Well don’t women who are raped in certain Islamic countries have to marry the rapist?
There was a case in Iran about that not too long ago that got international attention.
“discusses=talk...outlaw all talk that disturbs somebody and we have a truley free society as proposed by the US Constitution...not!!!”
There has been no violation of anyone’s First Amendment Rights.
And, the fraternity has no Constitutional right to be affiliated with the University of Vermont.
However, if you would like to test this constitutional question, you are free to publish a list of people in your community that you would like to rape or kill.
Let me know what happens to your First Amendment Rights when you are threatening specific people with violence.
I am not sure you have been to either Burlington or Teheran, but they are radically different places with vastly different expectations of their citizens.
Isn’t Vermont the pervert capitol of the US? Where the court system refuses to jail rapists, etc., the subject of many Bill O’Reilly reports of child rapist-friendly judges, at least one of whom had to retire after being exposed by BOR?
I guess the national fraternity organization and the university can ban the fraternity for any reason but, if the survey was some kind of satire, albeit in very poor taste, I bet any individuals who are suspended or expelled might be able to successfully fight it in court- if it’s a public university.
I note Wikipedia has an article entitled “Rape Fantasy”. If you read it you’ll have to turn yourself in.
“...discusses=talk...outlaw all talk that disturbs somebody and we have a truley free society as proposed by the US Constitution...not!!!”
I guess that openly “discussing” who you would enjoy sexually assaulting is Constitutional. Who knew?
Par for the course from young men who have probably been consuming internet porn since their early teens.
If the feminist culture wasn’t enough to destroy society, well the porn culture is going to finish us off.
It’s sick, it’s sad, but it’s not unexpected.
A new branch of “Mu-Upsilon-Zeta-Iota”?
Wow, obnoxious college kids being obnoxious college kids. Big deal.
Unfortunately, being an idiot sometimes does have consequences.
Maybe if someone had answered, “Well, I have always wanted to know what it would feel like to pin your mother down and yank her panties off while you held her arms,” - that would have hit home what they were really talking about.
The Democrat Party seemed to think it was perfectly fine for their Propaganda Minstry to discuss raping Sarah Palin and her daughters. Sexual violence is a common theme in popular music, and it’s considered racist to suggest there’s anything wrong about the authentic expressions of enraged victims of society. Women at “Occupy” camps aren’t supposed to report sexual assault, so clearly it’s no big deal.
In other words, I find it unremarkable that the students involved would believe their activity was perfectly acceptable to society.
Good points. It would be interesting to know their political affiliation.
Yes, that would be interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.