Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sadly true.
1 posted on 12/16/2011 11:28:39 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

2d, I have to laugh to avoid being so furious my head explodes.

The Feral bureaucracy has to go.

They’re so stupid really, thinking they can stop or control anything. When governments do that, throughout history (oh, I guess they’d have to have honestly studied it to know), everything just goes underground. Everything.


2 posted on 12/16/2011 11:35:07 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey... ban smoking,city bus fumes, ban kitchen knives, gasoline and lawn mowers, swimming pools and diving from rocks.

Eff a nanny state.


3 posted on 12/16/2011 11:39:21 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
C.S. Lewis

“I just wish the government would stop trying to save my life. I don't want to live forever!” Jim from C-town

6 posted on 12/16/2011 11:55:39 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The long-term goal of the left is to outlaw the automobile and force people onto various mass-transit systems. Buses, subways, high-speed rail, etc., all of which can be used to control free movement.


7 posted on 12/16/2011 11:59:38 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That is an excellent & somewhat horrifying thought experiment. Kudos!


12 posted on 12/17/2011 12:29:35 AM PST by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey, they still let us drive

They wouldn't if the automobile was invented now. All that personal freedom, all that individual responsibility - no way. What freedoms and control of our own lives that we still have are holdovers from the time before the American nanny state took root.
13 posted on 12/17/2011 12:41:28 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I keep reading about this ban, and I have to wonder about the hands-free portion. My car has the hands-free built in. One push of a button, and the rest is voice activated. So how are they going to enforce this in this situation? I mean, I have no earpiece, so for all they know I could be singing to the radio or speaking to someone in the backseat. Am I going to get pulled over simply because I’m speaking at all? Besides, no one even bothers to enforce most of the traffic laws already in existence. I was at a light yesterday when a guy blew the red like a big dog, and there was a sheriff’s care on the other side, and he did nothing. So why even bother at this point with more arbitrary and ridiculous nanny state laws?


18 posted on 12/17/2011 3:37:14 AM PST by USMCWife6869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Maybe I am a conspiracy nutjob, maybe not.

I see the cell phone restrictions as another attempt to invade the privacy of citizens, by letting LE pull you over and get their eyes (and nose) inside your vehicle on the "suspicion" that you were using the device. In order to get the necessary proof of the offense, they will then have to download all information from your phone using one of those portable devices that were in the news recently and are already being used. EVERY automobile accident will result in the phones being downloaded, to determine whether either of the parties was illegally using their phone.

...And they will download EVERYTHING.

19 posted on 12/17/2011 3:44:15 AM PST by PalmettoMason ("The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Right on! And what’s with these tyrannical drunk driving laws too? And despotic school zones? I mean, if some idiot is driving home from the bar at 7:00 in the morning and some kid’s trying to get across the street but walks in front of the drunk’s SUV and gets splattered all over the road, just prosecute the drunk for negligent homicide. Don’t restrict MY freedom just because most of my fellow citizens can’t handle theirs!

/sarc some wouldn’t even notice


21 posted on 12/17/2011 5:15:47 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dear NTSB - STFU and MYOB


24 posted on 12/17/2011 5:47:39 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("Go now. Run along and tell your Xerxes that he faces Free Men here...not slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not a Federal issue or right. However, if a state wants to outlaw cell phone use and driving - heck yes!

Put away the damn phone and drive!


26 posted on 12/17/2011 6:00:41 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth (Soon to be a man without a country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve been thinking EXACTLY the same thing for years — if cars were invented today, there is NO WAY that our benevolent overseers would allow citizens to own and operate one. Never!

Aspirin would be prescription-only, public access to electricity would NEVER be allowed, aircraft would belong strictly to the military, and firearms ... HA!

This is the Nanny State in action, folks. It’s getting worse by the day and still we take no action.


30 posted on 12/17/2011 6:04:51 AM PST by DNME (A monarch's neck should always have a noose around it. It keeps him upright. - Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That idea has been abandoned as of yesterday. I read that they woke up and realized it would be unenforceable and would tick off too many people.


31 posted on 12/17/2011 6:06:12 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

When driving with passengers, should it be illegal to talk with them? Will radios be banned from cars?


32 posted on 12/17/2011 6:06:52 AM PST by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If electricity had been discovered today it wouldn't be allowed in homes because it would be deemed too "dangerous"

Becasue after all, we as a people are just too damned stupid to figure out what is dangerous and what is not.

33 posted on 12/17/2011 6:18:03 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I wish the government would do something about the di-hydrogen monoxide pollution. Where I am you can see it all the time.


35 posted on 12/17/2011 6:23:45 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Anybody seen talking in a car alone could be pulled over. Can’t ask ON*Star about locations. Imagine paying $100,000 for a car and not being able to use the built in phone.

Why do I think this law won’t apply to government folks or celebrities?


40 posted on 12/17/2011 9:00:36 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Either Obama can beat any GOP candidate or no GOP candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think this is mistake. Prior stories indicated “hands-free” devices were not part of the proposed ban.


46 posted on 12/17/2011 2:34:27 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama, Reid and Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson