Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

If George Bush had wanted to cut this 2% the democrap mdeia would have been SCREAMING about how evil Bush wanted to cut funding for social security and starve your grandmother.

This ‘2%’ cut is really almost 10% of all the funding for social security.

Instead of paying 15 percent per person the government is only getting 13 percent

And the people will not see 2% they only see 1% change in their paycheck- the ‘empoyer’ portion is where they other 1% comes from

so...

all this fuss over 1%? this lying communist kenyan asshole needs to be removed from office as soon as possible


6 posted on 12/20/2011 12:56:06 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K
the people will not see 2% they only see 1% change in their paycheck- the ‘empoyer’ portion is where they other 1% comes from

I certainly agree with the overall message of your post. One small correction, though, the 2% reduction was entirely from the employee side (employer percentate didn't change). Another reason this entire cut was such a gimmick; employers had no incentive to expand hiring as their cost of doing business remained unchanged.

9 posted on 12/20/2011 1:04:43 PM PST by Marathoner ("Government is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson