Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Showing Signs of Life in Iowa
The Hill ^ | 12/21/11 | Cameron Joseph

Posted on 12/21/2011 11:25:00 AM PST by Antoninus

Rick Santorum's presidential campaign has started to show signs of life, and GOP kingmakers in Iowa say the former senator has an outside shot of winning the caucus next month.

While the large religious conservative voting bloc remains split between Santorum, Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, many experts in the state say Santorum has more structure and momentum than the other two and could coalesce enough support to win the state.

However, he’s failed to break through in polling, barely making it out of the single digits. And if evangelical Christian voters, who make up the majority of caucus voters, remain divided, that could hand another contender the victory.

But Santorum got a powerful boost on Tuesday with an endorsement by Bob Vander Plaats, one of Iowa’s most powerful social conservatives.

The former Pennsylvania senator has spent more time in the state than any other candidate, is closely aligned ideologically with the state’s large number of religious conservatives, and has rolled out a number of endorsements from local Republican activists in recent days.

A strong showing by Santorum would echo former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee’s (R) late come-from-behind victory in Iowa. Huckabee’s move to the top came shortly after Thanksgiving, while Santorum has not yet shown that surge. But some say it’s not too late.

“The guy on the move is Santorum. He’s shown movement in terms of lining up these endorsements and people who can move voters, and showing movement on the ground,” said Craig Robinson, a former political director of the Iowa Republican Party, who is not endorsing a candidate. “He’s got major endorsements rolling in, he’s got his super-PAC advertising, he’s got his own TV ad up. His campaign is starting to show that there’s indisputable proof that there’s momentum. ... Bachmann and Perry are showing activity and calling it momentum.”

Santorum has slowly but steadily risen in the polls, unlike Bachmann, Perry, Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich, all of whom soared before sputtering. He was in a three-way tie for fourth place with Perry and Bachmann at 10 percent in the latest poll from the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling, just four points behind Gingrich.

Ron Paul and Mitt Romney have led recent polls, but most observers in Iowa say the two have hard ceilings of support and are unlikely to be able to expand much on their current bases of about 20 percent of the vote, leaving any candidate who can catch a late spark within striking distance.

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), a conservative kingmaker in the state, predicted that a large number of social conservatives would remain swayable up through the election, and campaign infrastructure would make the difference. King, who has not endorsed but is close with Bachmann, said that Santorum and Bachmann would benefit from that.

“The support is going to flow on caucus night to the candidate or candidates who are best organized on the precinct level,” he said. “Whoever can deploy a couple thousand good speakers out there to each one of those places who are compelling can make a difference because there will be a lot of undecideds sitting out there. At this point it looks to me like Santorum has the best structure and Bachmann is closing on that right now. Those two structures are the two best in the state.”

Vander Plaats heaped praise on Santorum’s record on Tuesday, and on Saturday called Bachmann and asked that she drop out of the race (she refused). He is popular with Iowa’s conservatives, led the successful fight to remove three Iowa Supreme Court justices after they legalized gay marriage, and ran for governor in 2010, nearly winning the GOP primary against popular Gov. Terry Branstad (R).

He received nearly 100,000 votes in that race, almost as many voters as usually turn out for the GOP presidential caucuses.

“It’s a meaningful endorsement and one which I’m sure Michele Bachmann wished she could have received,” said Danny Carroll, a social conservative activist and Bachmann supporter in the state. “It would be a mistake to write Rick Santorum off; it would be inaccurate. You can’t have the kind of support and endorsements Sen. Santorum has received and not be a serious competitor.”


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: election2012; gopprimary; santorum; zombielife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last
Santorum has been my guy from day 1, though up til now, I didn't think he had much of a shot.

I think he would make an outstanding president, frankly. He's a solid man. Good husband. Great father. Homeschooler. Pro-life. Pro-family. Strong on fiscal policy. Strong on international policy.

What's not to like?
1 posted on 12/21/2011 11:25:04 AM PST by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
What's not to like?

His personality.

2 posted on 12/21/2011 11:28:04 AM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Ping.

Perhaps it's time to start a Santorum ping-list.
3 posted on 12/21/2011 11:28:15 AM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

What’s not to like?
Almost everything about him screams anti establishment...that’s what I love about him!

Joe Biden says He’s well spoken and clean too! I love Rick Santorum for President and would bet dollars to donuts Sarah endorses him if he gets more steam.


4 posted on 12/21/2011 11:30:39 AM PST by oust the louse (Keep your politicians at arms length...they don’t fit the hero tag. Trust but verify!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
His personality.

That's subjective. I don't like Romney or Paul's personality. Some people will like it, others won't. That's not something to worry over.
5 posted on 12/21/2011 11:30:39 AM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Santorum is decidedly the most dedicated Christian of the three: pro-family, pro-life, and pro-morality. But he is a Catholic, and it depends whether the Evangelicals are willing to recognize what he stands for.

Newt is also Catholic, now. But, I must say, not my kind of Catholic. I cannot judge his private life, but I will say that he does not strike me as having a firm moral foundation for public life.

Perry says he is a good Evangelical. I rather doubt it, from what I have seen. But he could suck votes away from the other Rick.

I think Santorum is the best of the bunch, unless Palin returns. But I don’t know if he has the polical strength necessary. Still, you can trust him, and I don’t trust any of the other current contenders.


6 posted on 12/21/2011 11:30:52 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"What's not to like?"

The only two things that can be held against him was his support (via pressure from the GOP establishment) of Specter over Toomey in the 2004 Republican primaries in Pa. And his big loss for re-election in 2006.

Campared to the other candidates baggage, this is trifling.
7 posted on 12/21/2011 11:32:27 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

This is going to be Huckabee all over again, all he is doing is getting Romney the nomination.


8 posted on 12/21/2011 11:34:19 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Let’s be honest. Bachmann, Santorum or Perry are the only options.

NewtRomney is unacceptable. Their main difference is hair and religion.


9 posted on 12/21/2011 11:34:31 AM PST by heiss (heartless and inhumane (radical rightwinger))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I think I’ll send him some money........he’s at the top of my list among the “lower tier” of candidates. Hope to see him rise to the tippy top!


10 posted on 12/21/2011 11:36:43 AM PST by cblue55 (Annoy a Liberal: Say "Merry Christmas")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
The only two things that can be held against him was his support (via pressure from the GOP establishment) of Specter over Toomey in the 2004 Republican primaries in Pa. And his big loss for re-election in 2006.

And frankly, based on how Toomey has performed early on (not great--supported the repeal of DADT), that fault looks smaller and smaller in retrospect.
11 posted on 12/21/2011 11:37:05 AM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Rick Santorum is a nice guy, good husband, father...but not LEADER, He is much to wussy, and a professional politician, how does he support his large family running all over the country trying for political office???

I am a Pennsylvanian, he began his POTUS tour in Somerset, Pennsylvania, I was there, small crowd, he does not have the votes he will need..he is very weak politically, he didn't even try fighting for his Senate seat...nice guy, not Presidential.

12 posted on 12/21/2011 11:37:46 AM PST by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

Santorum is the textbook definition of “Nice Guys Finishing Last”

Sad to say, but it is true.


13 posted on 12/21/2011 11:41:32 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I think what we really need is a complete “B@$t@rd with a heart of Gold”.

Not sure who fits that ticket... yet...

Newt comes close but he is too much of a progressive for my taste.


14 posted on 12/21/2011 11:43:45 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I don’t know, I think Toomey is a pretty solid conservative who helped to author a pretty good sentate bill for reducing the deficit. The DADT statements was just an admission of reality unfortunately. In any case, he is infinitely better than Specter.


15 posted on 12/21/2011 11:45:46 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
If you are doing one, sign me up.


16 posted on 12/21/2011 11:45:52 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Rick refusing to endorse the much more conservative Pat Toomey over RINO Senator Arlen Specter during Pat’s first run for U.S. Senate, Rick’s bad defeat to, now, Senator Bob Casey, and his personality (”I’m the only one of the candidates for ‘12 President to do ...!” “I was the first one to do ... on this issue!”)-making Rick appear as arrogant and rude-are problems for Rick.


17 posted on 12/21/2011 11:47:03 AM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Santorum has two really big things going against him.

First he was a ‘senator’ and is still called as such. Obama & McCain saw to it that the senate is no place to find a president whether it’s earned or not.

Secondly he was also pro-Arlen Spectacle (see first point) for which many will never forgive him and he’s still paying an awful price for that in flyover country.


18 posted on 12/21/2011 11:48:48 AM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I like Santorum. Really I do. But I think he isn’t going anywhere in the polls because he lacks the money and political machinery to compete with the big guys - right now Romney and Gingrich. The same is true of Bachmann.

Like it or not, and I don’t particularly do, we will have to choose between ROmney and Gingrich unless someone better suddenly appears and I DON’T mean Chris Christie.

But this has been a roller coaster of a race and who knows. Stranger things have happened and we may be chosing between Santorum and Romney - and THAT is NO CONTEST and a no brainer in my opinion. See my tagline.


19 posted on 12/21/2011 11:53:26 AM PST by ZULU (Anybody but Romney or Huntsman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Nice guy, conservative, so he has to be trashed like the rest of the conservatives running.

3-2-1.......start trashin’


20 posted on 12/21/2011 11:54:01 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Bob Casey is the worst Senator and LAZY to boot...that Pennsylvania has ever had...

He is hiding under a rock somewhere and comes out occasionally..we need a strong candidate for his job and no one is coming forward...why does not Rick try to reclaim that job????? makes me wonder about Santorum...

21 posted on 12/21/2011 11:56:55 AM PST by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GraceG; johnthebaptistmoore
Santorum is the textbook definition of “Nice Guys Finishing Last”

The funny thing here is that Santorum is being trashed as "too nice" and "too arrogant" on the same thread. That says to me he's probably just about right.

I do understand the charge that he is not polished enough. That said, I think he's come a long way in the debates. Unlike some of the others, he has continued to grow and improve with time and experience.

Plus -- and this is a big plus -- he drives the amoral left apoplectic. Like Sarah Palin, Rick's got all the right enemies. Unlike Sarah, he's actually putting it all out there and running.
22 posted on 12/21/2011 11:59:53 AM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: haircutter
so....
message to Rick Santorum...

give up this POTUS try and fight for your old Senate seat back, Bob Casey is weak...go for that position, cause you will not get President...

Get in the Senate and fight for Pennsylvania...that is a position you could win...

23 posted on 12/21/2011 12:01:04 PM PST by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

Rick Santorum running for ‘12 U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania makes sense, IMHO, but I’m not so sure that Rick can win such a race in politically unstable Pennsylvania. In fact, if Rick does end up as the final ‘12 GOP POTUS candidate, then I’m not so sure that Rick will be able to carry Pennsylvania during the November ‘12 general election!


24 posted on 12/21/2011 12:06:44 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Rick is a good guy. Unlike a lot of Pennsylvania conservatives, I forgive him for the indiscretion of supporting Specter over Toomey in the 2004 primary. He was chairman of the Republican Senate Election committee and being a good soldier and taking orders from Bush and Rove.

A bad move, to be sure. But it doesn't wipe out the years of good he did serving in congress.

My biggest fear is electability. He couldn't even crack 40% in his reelection bid against the empty suit Bob Casey, the dumbest guy with a penis in the U.S. Senate.

If he can pull off an upset in Iowa, people may be willing to take a second look.

25 posted on 12/21/2011 12:14:21 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The fact he is George Bush 3.0


26 posted on 12/21/2011 12:15:45 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Today on his show, Rush gave quite a nice endorsement for Santorum. Not a endorsement in the traditional sense but very warm, kind words on his behalf.


27 posted on 12/21/2011 12:18:30 PM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Ditto.:)


28 posted on 12/21/2011 12:22:04 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

>>>The only two things that can be held against him was his support (via pressure from the GOP establishment) of Specter over Toomey in the 2004 Republican primaries in Pa.

He’s explained that for anyone in Iowa that’s bothered to listen... yeah, it was to go along with the establishment... and - he’s said it was all about the judiciary committee... had Specter not been there, the appointments made during that time may not have succeeded - Roberts and Alito. I’m not going to quibble on that.


29 posted on 12/21/2011 12:23:36 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (No Mit Sherlock. No Mit, not now, not ever. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

Well said!!


30 posted on 12/21/2011 12:24:02 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I'd happily support Santorum (or Bachmann, or Cain, or Palin) as such a nomination would be indicative of a swing in government back to "of the people, by the people, for the people". Candidates of this caliber drive the liberals with their hands held out looking for their free goodies crazy. Likewise they drive the elitist republican country club types who view themselves as the contemporary bourgeoisie equally mad. This to me, a joe-the-plumber type citizen, is a win. A big win. I don't see that impact coming from any of the other candidates at present. Not even with Gingrich. Though he is not a friend of the current bourgeoisie, I fear he'd be all to pleased to start his own country club. We need to determine who best to write-in when the GOP hands us Romney on the ballot. If that candidate is Santorum, I'm fine with it and totally on-board. The same goes for Bachmann, Palin, and Cain. It'll be a battle to talk me into any one else at present.


31 posted on 12/21/2011 12:55:21 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

He has my support, not that it will likely matter by the time we vote here.


32 posted on 12/21/2011 1:01:42 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Mark Levin said that if he had to vote for someone in a Virginia primary today, the home of his “bunker”, it would be Bachmann or Santorum. And, he based that on solely on “character” or what someone will do (and it will happen) when the 2 AM call comes in. That’s good enough for me. A man with 7 kids has to have some strong compass or he’d go raving mad! Finally, I think Rick is doubling down in Iowa.


33 posted on 12/21/2011 1:36:29 PM PST by Frank Sheed (Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
What's not to like?

The fact that he threw Toomey UNDER the bus against Spector, that is the only bad thing about him.

34 posted on 12/21/2011 1:39:44 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (If we stay home in November '12... Don't complain if 0 shreds the constitution!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
" This is going to be Huckabee all over again, all he is doing is getting Romney the nomination. "

Santorum was not a governor who let out convicts who killed people.
Also, Rick Santorum does not come across as like Huck who is only social conservative, but, liberal everything else.

35 posted on 12/21/2011 1:59:20 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
" His personality. "

What is it about his personality that you don't like ?

Is it because he is not , well ? Charismatic ?

We don't need no charming bull crapping charmer for president, no thank you.
36 posted on 12/21/2011 2:01:16 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ExCTCitizen
The fact that he threw Toomey UNDER the bus against Spector, that is the only bad thing about him.

And Toomey then proceeded to throw conservatives under the bus by supporting the homosexualization of the military.

Sorry, that dog doesn't hunt any more.
37 posted on 12/21/2011 2:19:26 PM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
" * And Toomey then proceeded to throw conservatives under the bus by supporting the homosexualization of the military. * "
" Sorry, that dog doesn't hunt any more. "

Yeah, those who are supporting another supposed conservative candidate , to them ? it's more of a big sin that Rick Santorum didn't support Toomey, but, let's forget about the inconvenient fact that Toomey supported gays in the military.
38 posted on 12/21/2011 2:25:56 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

All this praise being heaped upon BVP is pure BS. The wheels are coming off as it is being reported that VP tried a million dollar shake down but of course, he’s denying it but he’s also denying he asked Bachmann to drop out of the race. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/21/vander-plaats-reportedly-asked-santorum-camp-to-help-raise-money-to-promote-endorsement/

I know who I believe.


39 posted on 12/21/2011 2:27:11 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

I agree with all you’re saying but Santorum may have some ‘splain to do over this BVP endorsement. I wouldn’t have wanted it if I were Santorum.


40 posted on 12/21/2011 2:30:36 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
What is it about his personality that you don't like ? Is it because he is not , well ? Charismatic ?

I used to see him on Greta from time to time and always liked him. But now that I see him in longer formats such as debates and townhalls, I have been finding him whiny and sanctimonious.

41 posted on 12/21/2011 3:11:03 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
" I used to see him on Greta from time to time and always liked him. But now that I see him in longer formats such as debates and townhalls, I have been finding him whiny and sanctimonious. "

Well, compare him to Romney and Newt he does not look so bad after all.
Newt can come off as a pompas sanctimonious jerk sometimes.
The question is ? whom can you trust the most ?
42 posted on 12/21/2011 3:20:51 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
Newt can come off as a pompas sanctimonious jerk sometimes.

Agree completely.

At this point I still don't have a preference. Not wild about anyone.

43 posted on 12/21/2011 4:33:55 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Rick Santorum is excellent. He is probably the best choice.
He has been a Catholic all his life and has been married to one woman.

Rick has been attacked by militant gay groups. Rick Santorum is the real deal.

He does not give fake speeches about Reagan and then promote global warming on the couch with Nancy Pelosi like Newt.

Go Rick.


44 posted on 12/21/2011 9:58:49 PM PST by John360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

No he is not. Bush and Rove pushed him to support Specter. Santorum did not want to.

Vote for whom ever you want to but don’t go for Newt or Huntsman. Newt is a CFR/NWO RINO who worked with Clinton to pass MFN for China, GATT/WTO and a lot of things that were in total violation of The Constitution.

Newt is a Pelosi Republican who campaign for Dede in NY. Dede lost and she supported the DEMOCRAT.

Santorum is far more conservative than Newt. Newt treats conservative voters like he treats his ex-wives.


45 posted on 12/21/2011 9:58:50 PM PST by John360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
But he is a Catholic, and it depends whether the Evangelicals are willing to recognize what he stands for.

I'm evangelical, and every evangelical I've spoken to about him likes him and recognizes his Christianity. That will not be an issue. :-)

46 posted on 12/22/2011 4:28:14 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John360

“Santorum is far more conservative than Newt.”

The facts are that Gingrich’s voting record was rated higher than Santorum’s.


47 posted on 12/22/2011 6:24:24 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: alnick

Good. Glad to hear it.


48 posted on 12/22/2011 8:09:36 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: so_real

I agree about Santorum, Bachmann and Palin being the best choices. Gingrich is the worst along with Huntsman. Rick Perry is light years better than Gingrich.


49 posted on 12/22/2011 8:24:03 AM PST by John360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Did Pat Toomey really vote for gays in the military? I had forgotten about that. Some conservative.

That jerk Scott Brown in Mass also voted for gays in the military. He sends me emails for money. He can go to h*ll. Rick Santorum gets attacked by gay groups left a right.

Rick Santorum would NOT have voted for gays in the military like Toomey.


50 posted on 12/22/2011 8:28:47 AM PST by John360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson