Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Our Nuclear Secrets Safe In Obama's Hands?
IBD Editorials ^ | December 23, 2011 | Editor

Posted on 12/23/2011 5:34:40 PM PST by Kaslin

Inviting Espionage: The administration is considering reviving a '90s-era nuclear scientist exchange program with China. Does no one in the White House remember how much damage the previous arrangement caused?

Of the many regrettable initiatives dreamed up by the Clinton administration, few were as perverse as the nuclear scientist exchange program. The arrangement turned out to be a gift to the Chinese, who were able to steal U.S. nuclear secrets virtually in plain sight.

Either unable or unwilling to learn from the past, the Obama administration wants to bring the program back. The Washington Times reports that "Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel B. Poneman is working on a major Obama administration initiative that would renew scientist exchanges between U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories and Chinese nuclear facilities."

The 1990s version of the exchanges yielded unprecedented espionage. How bad was it? An internal lab document obtained and reported by IBD in 1999 indicated that "during the Clinton administration, the number of Chinese nationals working" at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico had "catapulted 411%."

We're not saying every Chinese worker at the lab was a spy. But Congress found at least 13 suspected spies gained lab access without proper CIA or FBI vetting. Why open U.S. labs to scientists from a nation that had already been stealing our nuclear secrets for decades?

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: nationalsecurityfail; nuclearsecrets; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Kaslin

Kinda late to bring this matter up, isn’t it?

That’s why he must be vetted in 2012 before he is allowed to run the 2nd time.

Who is Obama and where is he from?


41 posted on 12/23/2011 8:55:59 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

NO. More emphasis: Hell, NO!


42 posted on 12/23/2011 10:17:20 PM PST by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreatRoad
If there is any truth to the “truthers” it’s more likely the Demoncrats allowed it.

It us certain the Gorelick Memo made discovery of plots before their execution more problemmatical. Would those who make their omlettes by breaking 'a few eggs' go so far as to sacrifice a few Americans to further their own agendae? ...make the opposition seem incompetent? ...enact laws which could be used against Americans later?

'Fast and Furious' says yes, they would.

While that seems tinfoil hat stuff, any more, reality is getting pretty far under the old Reynolds Wrap.

The more outrageous the plot seems, the more easily it is dismissed as "Conspiracy Theory" or 'kookiness'.

But Joe McCarthy was right, and the WTC 7 collapse still looks a lot like an implosion job to me.

BTW, that isn't saying Bush did anything, the terrorists had likely been plotting for longer than he was in office, and he had a host of entrenched holdovers in agencies everywhere.

43 posted on 12/23/2011 11:30:10 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
They are able and willing to learn from the past. They saw how much damage it did and want to repeat the damage.

Kind of like those destructive yet ubiquitious "unintended consequences" of [fill in compassionate liberal program here]. Just because the damage was unforeseen by some/most, doesn't mean it was unintended. Look at the WOD... some think it is a failure, but it is actually quite a success. TSA is another success story from the pit of hell.

44 posted on 12/23/2011 11:40:58 PM PST by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes, But,
Billy boy was able to receive substantial contributions from the chi coms for giving them our nuke secrets like how to MIRV nuke rockets.
Come on now what’s more important? Priorities now ya know...


45 posted on 12/24/2011 4:07:36 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Our secrets aren’t safe with any dim president.

From a secular aspect, dims treat World Peace exactly as they treat society.
Everyone should have equal. Equal powers will live in peace.
The rich (technologically superior) should give to the poor (technologically inferior).

Clinton did it with missile technology. MIRV technology to China in particular. With a little money changing hands no doubt.

Add religious conviction to that and we’re in real trouble.


46 posted on 12/24/2011 4:39:03 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

NO, Next Question


47 posted on 12/24/2011 4:59:09 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This all gets back to Clinton's idea (Obie has obviously endorsed it in spades) that America is the big bad dog that the rest of the world hates because we're so dominant. The thinking goes, if we make America weaker, on par with the rest of the world, we won't be the target of the have-nots. Let's let everyone have nucleur weapons, for example. Or share our defense technologies with the world.

All the above relies on trust, but if few of the have-nots are trustworthy, we're committing a suicide of sorts by arming our enemies.

America is one of the few who've proven to be trustworthy. Yes, we used the bomb. Once....to save millions. We've fought all over the globe but never to enrich ourselves. We've fought to free more Muslims around the world than anyone else. All we've asked, as Colin Powell once said, is enough ground to bury our dead. We've projected our integrity onto peoples that don't deserve it. Simply take a look at the stone age mentality of much of the middle east, or the deceitful intentions and actions of the Chinese. It won't end well, for us, at least.

It's becoming clearer that the world sorely misses our role as sheriff.

48 posted on 12/24/2011 7:53:34 AM PST by chiller ( Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

str = strip club...


49 posted on 12/24/2011 8:42:08 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson